DSS.950228 Class Minutes #13, 28 February 1995 Religious Studies 225, Dead Sea Scrolls, Robert Kraft Recorded by Lance "Sleeper" Allred and Hunter "Swimmer" Powell Administrative and Preliminary Matters The Garcia Martinez book has arrived (the red cover book of English translations). If you want to be a overachiever you should read ahead during spring break. Start at the start with the major sectarian texts (Manual of Discipline = 1QS, Damascus Document = CD), after which we will move on to escatalogical material (War Scroll = 1QM), and the "para-biblical" materials. Dr. Kraft had a brief show-and-tell period in which he showed off his small "souvenir type" replica of the Manual of Discipline and it's storage jar. He also put in a small plug by passing around the recent "Discoveries in the Judean Desert" volume on the Greek Minor Prophets scroll by Emanuel Tov, with collaboration by RAK. We were also reminded of the correct spelling of VanderKam and Fitzmyer, for reporting purposes. Some "cleanup" questions ensued, as usual. An attempt was made, again, to clarify some archeological aspects of the Qumran site and the caves. Kraft reminded us that there are many caves in the Qumran area, but only eleven had written material included in the designation "DSS." The caves could have been used for a variety of things, including habitation in some. Kraft talked about the use of Carbon-14 dating of the scrolls, and reminded us that this method can tell us when the tested organic material (linen, leather, papyrus) began to be produced, but it cannot necessarily tell us when the document was written (e.g. leather hides collected decades earlier might be used at a later date). The possibilities of DNA testing set the class off onto a rampant discussion as to the chances of finding the ancient location and even the modern descendants of animals that were used for the leather of the DSS (including non inscribed leather such as straps, sandals, etc.), or at least identifying fragments that came from the hide of the same animal. The class remained on this topic for a good twenty minutes, with such random comments as "we could open another Jurassic Park!" Kraft reminded us that although he might hesitate to identify the DSS composers/users as "Essenes," he does recognize that the scrolls evidence certain "Essene" characteristics similar to those described by Josephus and Philo. The producers of the DSS don't call themsevles Essenes, although they have various other self-designations including (as Sigrid has just informed Lance and Hunter) The Ya{.h}ad (the community). It is possible that "Essene" was a designation used mainly by outsiders to describe a type of outlook characteristic of various similar groups in the area. The Main Topic: Controversies In the first decade of the DSS discoveries, many controversies already surrounded the scrolls, as discussed especially by Millar Burrows (The DSS [1955] and More Light on the DSS [1957]). Solomom Zeitlin wrote many articles claiming that the DSS were at best, medieval hoaxes, to be understood in relation to movements such as the Karaites. His student, J. Teicher, acknowledged that the scrolls were older than that, but interpreted them as products of early "Jewish Christian" concerns and developments (see, more recently, Robert Eisenman). John Allegro, in his rise to noteriety, even suggested that the "teacher of righteousness" had been crucified and was expected to be resurrected, as a sort of prefigurement of what would later be claimed for Jesus (see also J. Dupont-Sommer). A special sidelight also associated with Allegro is "the Shapira Affair": A Russian Jew by the name of W. M. Shapira moved to Jeruselem around 1856 and opened an antiquities shop. He was selling things as "Moabite" artifacts and a French scholar said that they were fake. Some years later, in the 1870s, Shapira obtained 15 leather strips from a Bedouin, who claimed to have found them near the shore of the Dead Sea, containing what Shapira determined to be Hebrew text of the book of Deuteronomy. He took these stips to London where they were authenticated and put on display in the British Museum. Once on display, the same Frenchman came along and declared them to be fakes; the exibit was taken down and the artifacts were sold very cheaply. Shapira, disgraced, committed suicide. Allegro asks if perhaps these were authentic "DSS" type materials, in his book on the subject. The current whereabouts of these Shapira materials is unknown, if they have survived at all. (to be continued) //end dss.950228//