From kraft Mon Jan 23 01:24:50 1995 Subject: Re: Origin of DSS To: dss Date: Mon, 23 Jan 1995 01:24:50 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <199501230553.FAA24781@mail2.sas.upenn.edu> from "Christine Boulos" at Jan 23, 95 00:53:44 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23-upenn2.9] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1658 Status: RO > I was wondering if you could clarify something I > came across in my reading of Vanderkam. He mentions that the majority of > the theories support the idea that a predominate number of the QS were > either copied or written at Qumran. He also mentions that some of the scrolls > were not written there, but he does not elaborate on where these scrolls may > have originated. Are there any theories that correspond with the already > established history of Qumran and the scrolls about where the other > scrolls may have originated? In asking questions, please be as specific as possible about the source of your information -- in this case, where in VanderKam? I do find on p.29, right at the start of his ch.2, the statement that not all of the texts found in the Qumran caves could have been written/copied at Qumran, since some of them predate the first period of occupation of that site. I suppose that the pre-Qumran history of the occupants, assuming that they constituted a group with a connected history, could supply us with clues to the origins of such early texts (did they come from Damascus, or is "Damascus" a symbol for some other location?). But I doubt that there is enough consensus on that issue to say more. As with many such materials, we can only make what seem to us intelligent guesses. Even the identification of any of the fragments with the Qumran site is conjectural, although it has come to be taken for granted by most commentators (that is, it seems reasonable to them). Now if some scraps of writing had been found in the room with the inkwells, we might be able to get farther on this. RAK