[Originally published in 
[Computer Assisted Tools for Septuagint Studies (CATSS):
[Volume 1: RUTH.
[Directed by Robert A. Kraft and Emanuel Tov.
[Society of Biblical Literature:
[Septuagint and Cognate Studies Series 20.
[Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1986. Pages 53-68.

  
           I.3 TREATMENT OF THE GREEK TEXTUAL VARIANTS 
  
  
                         Robert A. Kraft 
  
  
  
     One of the major goals of the CATSS project is the encoding 
of all significant textual variations in the Greek tradition.  
Ultimately, this will include ancient versions and other 
secondary evidence (e.g. patristic quotations) based on the Greek  
texts. At the outset, however, our goal is to be able to access  
by computer the major published apparatuses in the Go%ttingen  
editions and, where there is no Go%ttingen edition, in the larger  
Cambridge Septuagint.  
  
  
I.3.1 Format of the Greek Textual File 
  
     For purposes of the project, and in accord with efficient 
computer management and utilization, it was decided to place each  
Greek word on a separate line to the extent that this was  
practical. The Greek main text (Rahlfs' edition, for Ruth) was 
first reformatted in that fashion as a "vertical text," and the  
textual evidence (from the larger Cambridge edition, for Ruth) 
was reorganized and integrated into the same format. This format 
allows for efficient searching of the file, analysis of textual  
groupings, recreation of the main text or of the consecutive text  
of particular witnesses and/or families, etc. Unfortunately, this  
is not the conventional way in which published textual 
apparatuses are presented, so a great deal of reorganization and 
innovation in formatting has been required.  

     The resulting Greek text, in its fullest form, intersperses 
the main text (Go%ttingen or Rahlfs) with the textual variants 
rather than keeping text and apparatus in separate blocks or 
files. On each line of the comprehensive file, the first fifteen 
"columns" (spaces, characters) are used to indicate the location 
of the particular item (book, chapter, verse, etc.). If the line 
contains a main text entry ("lemma"), that begins in column 16.  
If the line records a variant reading rather than a main text  
lemma, column 16 is blank and column(s) 17(-18) contain(s) the 
appropriate siglum for that variant (see below). Thus it is a  
simple matter to recreate the main text by instructing the 
computer to reproduce only the lines in which column 16 is not 
blank. If a variant is associated with the main text lemma, the  
lemma (and any closely related information about attestation) is 
followed immediately by a right bracket (]); any witnesses that  
do not attest the lemma ("minuses" or "omissions") are noted to  
the right of the bracket, on the same line, prefixed with the ">"  
sign; alternative readings are recorded on subsequent lines, as  
are any additional materials ("pluses"). All Greek words, whether  
main text or variants, include accents and breathings (except for  
undeclined proper names and apparent nonsense readings). 
Punctuation is included as part of the main text, and variations 
in punctuation between the main editions consulted are also  
noted. 
  
     The detailed "file format" for any given line ("record") of 
the full Greek text (including variants) is as follows:  
  
  columns (spaces) beginning 
  from the left margin and 
  numbered horizontally              1         2         3 
  along each line           12345678901234567890123456789012 (etc.)  
  
                            |  |  |  | |   | 
   1-2 = book (abbrev.)     RT |  |  | |   | 
   4-5 = chapter               03 |  | |   | 
   7-8 = verse                    05 | |   | 
  10-11= (item                      (06|   | 
  12-13=  variation)                   02) | 
  16   = start of lemma (if any)           XXX...]...  
  17-18= sigla of variant (if any)          +: 
  19   = start of variant (if any)            XXX... 
  ...  = textual attestation                     ...(MSS)... 
  
If there is a variant to the lemma that begins in column 16, the 
lemma is followed by a squared right bracket (]).  

     The textual apparatus to the Greek Ruth was entered "by 
hand" over a period of several weeks by R. A. Kraft and his  
graduate assistant, Benjamin Wright. In deciphering the apparatus  
to the Cambridge edition of Brooke-McLean (there is no Go%ttingen  
edition of Ruth at present), an attempt was made to break it up  
into single word entries and to insert those entries at the  
appropriate locations in the sequence of the main text (Rahlfs)  
that we had purchased from TLG. This was intended as an  
experiment as well as an act of data entry, to alert us to the 
sorts of problems that would be encountered in dealing with  
variants in this novel manner. A few chapters of Genesis were  
also entered in the same way. Subsequent encoding of the textual 
apparatuses has been done, at the initial level, by means of 
automatic data entry on an "optical character reader" (OCR) or 
"scanner" and reformatted afterwards by a series of computer 
programs. The resulting files are then checked carefully "by 
hand" for completeness, correctness and consistency. 

     For the book of Ruth, the lemma or main text is that of 
Rahlfs with the exception that <g>KAI/GE</g> is treated as a 
single word (in accord with recent practice following  
Barthe/lemy's investigations) rather than as two words (as in  
Rahlfs and older editions). The apparatus is from the larger 
Cambridge Septuagint (ed. Brooke and McLean), adjusted to the  
main text of Rahlfs. For examples of the adjustments involved see  
below, I.3.5 for <g>KAI/GE</g> and I.3.11 for readings in which  
the main text of Rahlfs differs from that of Cambridge (MS B). 
  
  
I.3.2 Locators (Book, Chapter, Verse, Item/Variant)  
  
     For many purposes in computer assisted searching and  
sorting, it is crucial that each line has a tag indicating its 
location in the file. With our materials, the conventional 
chapter and verse locators in each book are prefixed 
automatically, plus a four column code (within parentheses) to 
number each distinct item (word, variant unit, punctuation mark) 
within the verse. The four numbers within the parentheses are  
actually intended as two sets of two numbers; the two leftmost 
numbers indicate the item itself while the two rightmost numbers 
attach to any variant units within the item. Thus "0403" 
identifies the 4th item in the verse and the 3rd alternative in  
that variant unit; "1400" means the 14th item, for which there is  
no variant (note that item 14 may itself be a "plus" reading); 
"2101" means an item (number 21) which is lacking in some  
witnesses (thus 01, but there will not be a 2102 unless an 
alternative reading also exists), or an item for which 
alternative readings exist (which are numbered 2102, etc.).  
Punctuation also receives an item number and if there is variant 
punctuation, a variant number as well. 
  
  
I.3.3 Quantitative Variation ("Pluses" and "Minuses")  
  
     Few problems were encountered in the recording of "pluses"  
and "minuses" (quantitative variants). It was decided to include 
on the same line as the lemma, after the right square bracket  
(]), any notation that certain witnesses lacked that lemma, using  
the conventional "greater than" symbol (>) to indicate the type  
of variation and to introduce the textual witnesses containing 
the shorter text. For instances in which some witnesses include  
additional material absent from the base text, each "added" word 
was placed on a separate line preceded by the conventional "plus"  
sign (+) and followed by the list of witnesses. The only 
inconvenience of these procedures was that it became necessary to  
repeat for each entry the list of witnesses attesting any ">" or 
"+" readings that were more than a single word in length. In this  
connection, we decided to identify readings in which three or  
more consecutive words were lacking by the appended notation 
(>3), etc., and consecutive pluses that extend to four or more 
words by (+4), etc., to aid persons who search the variant file  
for specific occurrences but cannot see the surrounding context. 

     A somewhat more complicated problem was encountered in those  
instances in which a "plus" reading in one witness is balanced by  
an alternative "plus" reading in another (variant to a variant). 
Since it is important to know when such alternative variants are 
encountered as well as what each particular variant may be, the  
first entry of a "plus"-with-alternative(s) unit is prefixed with  
"+:" while the subsequent alternatives to it are identified with 
the ":+" indicator. For the numbering of such variation units, 
see I.3.2 above. 

     "Praemittit (-unt)" Readings. A special type of "plus"  
reading is material that depends closely upon what follows it to 
form a sense unit. Although the textcritical convention normally 
used to identify such material is "pr," an attempt was made to be  
clear as to the type of variation involved and to avoid confusion  
in the choice of sigla ("pr" could also designate two manuscripts  
in the Cambridge system); thus such readings are treated as a "+"  
followed by the symbol for "less than" (<). Where a string of  
several words form a longer text of the "pr" type, the 
designation "+<" normally introduces only the first word of the  
string. When a "pr" type variant entry itself has one or more  
alternative variations linked to it, the alternatives are  
indicated by the usual ":+" symbol combination (see above) since 
it would be necessary to examine the immediately preceding lines 
in the variant file to understand the entire variation unit in 
any event. 

     "Transposed" Material (Inversions). Although  
"transpositions" are not really quantitative variations insofar  
as the total length of the context in which they occur may not be  
affected, they can be handled effectively as a balanced set of 
"minus" and "plus" readings. Thus in the notation used in the  
project, the siglum ">" accompanied on the same line by "(~)"  
indicates a "transposition" and will be balanced in the  
surrounding context by a line on which the "+" is accompanied by 
"(~)" for the same textual witnesses. For example, when the order  
of words in the main text (m) is 123456 but a variant text (v) 
has the order 563412, the notation will contain ten lines as 
follows: 
  
  1 m] > v(~)  
  2 m] > v(~)  
     + 5 v(~)  
     + 6 v(~)  
  3 mv 
  4 mv 
     + 1 v(~)  
     + 2 v(~)  
  5 m] > v(~)  
  6 m] > v(~)  
  
If a computer search is made of the readings in v, it will be  
noted immediately that the apparent "omission" of 1-2 is balanced  
by the apparent "addition" of the same elements later. Other 
variants involving the same body of text will also be included 
alongside the transposed material. Thus it is possible to handle 
this sort of variation consistently and effectively within the 
framework of the desired one-variant-word-per-line format. 
  
  
I.3.4 Qualitative Variations (Substitutions/Alternatives)  
  
     When some witnesses have an alternative reading to what is  
in the main text, this is preceded by a colon (:) and followed by  
a list of the pertinent witnesses. If the alternative reading is 
itself part of a "plus" text, the first affected entry is  
preceded by "+:" (or "+<" for a "pr" type "plus") and the  
alternatives by ":+". The numbering of the item within the verse 
(in parentheses after the chapter and verse numbers) is identical  
in the first two columns for all members of a substitution 
variant unit, while the lemma text itself is numbered 01 in the  
last two columns and each of the alternatives is numbered 02, 03,  
etc. (see further above, I.3.2). 
  
  
I.3.5 Special Problem: One Word / Two Word Variants  
  
     In some passages, the variant cannot easily be reduced to a 
single Greek word without compromising the basic sequence or the 
principles on which the file has been formatted. This is 
especially true when the Greek permits crasis, the joining of two  
words such as <g>KAI/</g> and <g>E)GW/</g> into one  
(<g>KA)GW/</g>), but obtains as well in other instances where an 
analogous situation is attested in the textual witnesses. The  
following examples are instructive:  
  
RT 01 12(1001) <g>DIO/TI]  
RT 01 12(1002)  : <g>DH\</g> b(+<g>O(/TI</g>)  
RT 01 12(1003)  : <g>DIA/</g> MNdefhijmrsuyb2 OL 
RT 01 12(1100)  + <g>TOU=TO</g> MNdefhijmrsuyb2 OL 
RT 01 12(1200)  +<<g>O(/TI</g> MNbdefhijmrsuvyb2 OL Thdt 
  
Note that the elements <g>DI, DH</g> and <g>DIA</g> are true 
variants, but that <g>OTI</g> must also be treated as a "plus" in  
some witnesses insofar as <g>TOUTO</g> separates it from the 
<g>DI</g>/<g>DIA</g> element (the similarity of MS b to the  
MNdef, etc., grouping is apparently coincidental here since MS b 
really reads <g>DH OTI</g> without an intervening <g>TOUTO</g>). 
  
RT 02 09(3000) <g>KAI\</g> 
RT 02 09(3101) <g>O(/</g> .. ] 
RT 02 09(3201) <g>TI</g>]  
RT 02 09(3202)  : <g>O(/TE</g> abdefjlqw 
RT 02 09(3203)  : <g>O(PO/TE</g> MNhikmprtuvb2 
RT 02 09(3204)  : ubi OS 
RT 02 09(3205)  : si OC OL 
  
The two dots after <g>O(/</g> signify that the minimal variant 
unit here is <g>O(/ TI,</g> and the alternatives listed after  
<g>TI</g> in actuality relate to both words (<g>O(/ TI</g>), not 
simply to <g>TI</g>. 
  
RT 03 04(0100) <g>KAI\</g> 
RT 03 04(0201) <g>E)/STAI</g>] > OC OE 
RT 03 04(0301) <g>E)N</g> .. ] 
RT 03 04(0401) <g>TW=|</g>]  
RT 03 04(0402)  : <g>O(/TAN</g> 30 
RT 03 04(0500) <g>KOIMHQH=NAI</g>  
  
Here, MS 30 lacks the words <g>E)N TW=|</g> and has in their 
place the word <g>O(/TAN</g>. This could be treated as a ">" with  
a "+" or (as we have done; note the ".." joiner) as a one-for-two  
substitution.  
  
RT 04 04(0101) <g>KA)GW\</g>] > b2 
RT 04 04(0102)  : <g>KAI\</g> .. aglnoptva2e2  
RT 04 04(0200)  + <g>E)GW\</g> aglnoptva2e2  
RT 04 04(0301) <g>EI)=PA</g>] > ptvb2  
RT 04 04(0302)  : <g>EI)=PON</g> glnoe2  
  
Here is a blatant two-for-one variation, treated somewhat  
artificially as a substitution and a "+" joined by "..". 
  
RT 04 04(5101) <g>KA)GW/</g> ABabmxa2] > OL(ego) 
RT 04 04(5102)  : <g>KAI\</g> .. MNcdefghijklmopqrstuvb2e2 
RT 04 04(5103)  : et [post te ego sum] OA-ed 
RT 04 04(5200)  + <g>E)GW/</g> MNcdefghijklmopqrstuvb2e2 OL  
RT 04 04(5301) <g>EI)MI</g>] > OA-ed 
  
Here the complexity of possible readings, when OA and OL are 
considered, suggests that the ":" with "+" may be a more useful  
approach.  
  
RT 04 04(5700)  +<et OA-codd OE OL 
RT 04 04(5801) <g>O(] > 30</g>(see below) OA-ed(>3) OA-codd(>5) (see OE) 
RT 04 04(5802)  : ille OL  
RT 04 04(5901) <g>DE\</g>] > OA-ed(>3) OA-codd(>5) OE OL 
RT 04 04(5902)  : <g>W(=DE 30</g>(see above) 
RT 04 04(6000)  +<<g>KAI\</g> 30 
RT 04 04(6101) <g>EI)=PEN</g>] > OA-ed(>3) OA-codd(>5) 
  
The situation is complex: where most MSS have <g>O( DE/,</g> MS  
30 has a two-for-one reading <g>W(=DE</g> but OL has et ille 
(<g>KAI\ O(</g> ?).  

     Finally, in the two-for-one (or one-for-two) category, the  
treatment of <g>KAI/GE</g> should be noted. In accord with recent  
convention on this matter (relating especially to Barthe/lemy's  
research), we have modified earlier practice (including Rahlfs'  
text) to read <g>KAI/GE</g> as one word rather than two. This  
policy sometimes affects the treatment of variants as well:  
  
RT 01 05(0501) <g>KAI/GE</g>] > Akptv 18(~) OA OC OE OL  
  
RT 01 12(2801) <g>TOU=</g>]  
RT 01 12(2802)  : <g>KAI\</g> MN*hyb2 71 OA `?'(k) 
RT 01 12(2803)  : <g>KAI/GE</g> `a'(b) 
  
Here it would also be possible to treat the variants as ">" and  
"+". 
  
RT 02 16(0501) <g>KAI/GE</g>] > OL(>4) 
RT 02 16(0502)  : <g>KAI\</g> gklnowa2e2 OA OC 
  
RT 03 12(1801) <g>KAI/GE]  
RT 03 12(1802)  : <g>KAI\</g> hkmw 
RT 03 12(1900)  + <g>EI)</g> k 
RT 03 12(2000)  + <g>O(/TI</g> w 
RT 03 12(2100)  + quod(<g>TI?</g>) OS  
RT 03 12(2200)  + sed OL 
  
Probably the <g>EI)</g> in MS k represents the <g>GE</g> of  
<g>KAI/GE,</g> and perhaps a similar explanation obtains for OS. 
The apparatus in its present form does not attempt to adjudicate 
this matter. 
  
RT 04 10(0101) <g>KAI/GE</g>] > dkr OE OL(>14) 
RT 04 10(0102)  : <g>KAI\ H(</g> c 
  
As with 03 12 (above), probably the <g>H(</g> in MS c is an  
alternative to the <g>GE</g>. In this instance, the apparatus has  
left the two words of MS c together. 
  
  
I.3.6 Orthography  
  
     There has been no attempt to reproduce the first apparatus  
in the Cambridge edition, which lists orthographic differences 
between the major uncials. Such material can be added at any 
time, as a subset of "qualitative variations," by using the same 
coding. In fact, numerous orthographic variations are included in  
the material for the book of Ruth in the various treatments of 
certain proper names -- <g>*NWEMEIN</g> is an obvious example  
(see also I.3.11 below). 
  
  
I.3.7 Punctuation  
  
     With much hesitation, it was decided to include punctuation 
on its own line as a separate record, and to note differences in 
punctuation between the base text (for Ruth, Rahlfs) and the 
source of variants (for Ruth, Cambridge). Where the Go%ttingen 
edition will be used for both base text and variants, differences  
in punctuation in Rahlfs may be noted. 
  
  
I.3.8 Attestation (Manuscripts and Other Witnesses)  
  
     Normally, lists of witnesses are provided only for the  
deviations from the main text. In some instances, however, 
attestation (in part or in whole) for the lemma may also be  
included. These situations depend on the policy of the apparatus 
from which the material came, except for instances in which the  
Cambridge apparatus is being used and Rahlfs' main text differs  
from the Cambridge reading (MS B). When MS B is relocated as a 
variant and a Cambridge variant becomes the lemma text (in 
agreement with Rahlfs), attestation for the new main text  
(Rahlfs) will be listed from the Cambridge apparatus, along with 
whatever other information is available there. See I.3.11 for  
examples.  

     Default Attestation ("omn", "rell" or "rel"). For the 
Cambridge apparatus, which is based on a relatively small number 
of representative manuscripts, the manuscript designations 
included in the default attestation "omn" and "rell" or covered  
by such listings as "a-d" (= abcd) have been filled out  
explicitly in the project file. Different procedures may be  
required with the Go%ttingen apparatuses, which cover a much 
larger range of MSS. 

     Versional Evidence. For the present, we have attempted to 
reproduce the versional information found in the respective  
apparatuses consulted. This material requires especially close 
scrutiny and will need extensive modification sometime in the  
future. The Cambridge editors tended to supply relatively full 
information for the Old Latin (OL), Syro-hexapla (OS), Armenian  
(OA) and Palestinian Aramaic (OP) versions. They were more 
selective with the Ethiopic (OE) and Coptic (OC) materials. In 
the Ruth variant file, the OL spelling as found in the Cambridge 
edition is sometimes standardized by use of parentheses (to fill 
in letters), OS transliterations follow the Hebrew coding  
employed by the project, and relatively certain Greek  
retroversions are sometimes noted in parentheses. More 
satisfactory treatment of most of the versional material,  
however, must await the results of specific studies (with  
computer assistance?) on each of the versions. 

     Quotations and Other Secondary Witnesses. For the present 
the information in the source apparatus attesting patristic  
quotations and related material is simply reproduced. As with the  
versions, much work needs to be done before this type of evidence  
can be evaluated adequately. The advent of computer assisted 
research encourages us to look for greater progress in these 
areas in the near future.  

     Other Ancient Greek Versions ("the Three," etc.). The format  
constructed for the project is sufficiently flexible to  
accommodate the inclusion of all ancient Greek variants, from  
whatever source. Thus we have not attempted to devise a separate 
apparatus for "the Three" (Theodotion, Aquila, Symmachus) and  
similar materials. Instead, the apostrophe (') is used to  
indicate these materials, enclosing the sources designation on 
both sides ('t', 'a', 's', etc.) and the witness from which the  
information derives. A computer search of the file for any of  
these distinctive elements will enable the user to create an 
apparatus of these materials.  
  
  
I.3.9 Indicators of Uncertainty ("vid", "see", "?")  
  
     The apparatus reproduces the "vid" (= "apparently," but with  
room for doubt) notations in the Cambridge apparatus, but also 
adds other indicators of uncertainty: "see" is usually a term of 
cross reference and occurs especially in connection with 
versional material that has been broken into smaller units and 
often requires a consideration of the fuller versional context in  
order to determine what versional word(s) aligns with the Greek  
word; "?" is most often attached to a suggested reconstruction of  
versional material into Greek and warns the user that this is  
simply a suggestion (it is sometimes combined with "see" in such 
contexts). When "(?)" follows a MS designation, it simply  
reproduces the notation in the Cambridge apparatus; when it  
follows a versional siglum (OA, OC, OE, OL, OS), it usually is a 
warning to check the variant context carefully. In general, in 
these and in other occurrences, "?" is used as an indicator of 
doubt. 
  
  
  
I.3.10 Annotated Sample of Variant Text Notations (Ruth 
       3:5-6) 
  
book verse 
| chp | item 
|  |  |  | sub-variant                comments 
|  |  |  | | 
RT 03 05(0100)  +<<g>KAI\</g> 18              {pr type reading with  
RT 03 05(0200) <g>EI)=PEN</g>                  a <g>KAI/-DE/</g> variation 
RT 03 05(0301) <g>DE\</g>] > 18                in MS 18} 
RT 03 05(0401) <g>*ROUQ</g>] > (~)OA-OL(~)   {possible transpostion} 
RT 03 05(0500) <g>PRO\S</g>  
RT 03 05(0601) <g>AU)TH/N</g>] 
RT 03 05(0602)  : <g>AU)TH=|</g> b              {alternative readings} 
RT 03 05(0603)  : <g>AU)TO/N</g> o*  
RT 03 05(0700)  + <g>*ROUQ</g> (~)OA-OL(~)   {balances earlier "(~)"}  
RT 03 05(0800) <g>*PA/NTA</g>  
RT 03 05(0901) ,] > (B-M)             {punctuation difference} 
RT 03 05(1000) <g>O(/SA</g>  
RT 03 05(1101) <g>E)A\N</g> ABacfkxb2]         {base text attestation} 
RT 03 05(1102)  : <g>A)\N</g> MN<g>*D</g>(10)bdeghijlmnopqrstuvwa2e2 
RT 03 05(1200) <g>EI)/PH|S</g> 
RT 03 05(1300)  + <g>PRO/S</g> bcx            {simple plus}  
RT 03 05(1401)  +:<g>ME</g> bcx              {complex plus}  
RT 03 05(1402)  :+<g>MOI *D</g>(10)fhipqrtv OL OS  
RT 03 05(1403)  :+mihi OA OC OE  
RT 03 05(1501) ,] > (B-M)  
RT 03 05(1600) <g>POIH/SW</g>  
RT 03 05(1700) . 
RT 03 06(0101) <g>KAI\</g>] > OL(>5)          {extensive minus in OL}  
RT 03 06(0201) <g>KATE/BH</g>] > OL(>5)  
RT 03 06(0300)  + <g>*ROUQ</g> glnoptvwe2  
RT 03 06(0401) <g>EI)S</g>] > OL(>5) 
RT 03 06(0501) <g>TO\N</g>] > OL(>5) 
RT 03 06(0502)  :<<g>TH\N</g> b'glnoptvwe2 
RT 03 06(0601) <g>A(/LW</g>] > OL(>5)  
RT 03 06(0602)  : <g>A(/LWNA *D</g>(10)(vid)cghlmnoprtvwa2e2 {vid notation}  
RT 03 06(0700)  + , (B-M)             {punctuation added}  
RT 03 06(0800) <g>KAI\</g> 
RT 03 06(0900) <g>E)POI/HSEN</g> 
RT 03 06(1001) <g>KATA\</g>] 
RT 03 06(1002)  : <g>TA\</g> 74 76 
RT 03 06(1100) <g>PA/NTA</g> 
RT 03 06(1201) ,] > (B-M)  
RT 03 06(1300) <g>O(/SA</g>  
RT 03 06(1401) <g>E)NETEI/LATO</g>]  
RT 03 06(1402)  : <g>EI)=PEN</g> u 
RT 03 06(1501) <g>AU)TH=|</g>] > OL  
RT 03 06(1502)  : <g>AU)TH/N</g> oe2 
RT 03 06(1600) <g>H(</g> 
RT 03 06(1700) <g>PENQERA\</g> 
RT 03 06(1800) <g>AU)TH=S</g>  
RT 03 06(1900) . 
  
  
I.3.11 Differences between Rahlfs and Cambridge (MS B) 
  
RT 01 02(1401) <g>KAI\</g> (=c(a?)q(b) 236 [etc.])] >(>6) Bc*(~)q* OE(f) 
RT 01 02(1501) <g>O)/NOMA</g> ([etc. as above])] >(>6) Bc*(~)q* OE(f)  
RT 01 02(1601) <g>TH=|</g> (=c(a?) 236 [etc.])] >(>6) Bc*(~)q* OE(f) 
RT 01 02(1701) <g>GUNAIKI\</g> ([etc. as above])] >(>6) Bc*(~)q* OE(f) 
RT 01 02(1801) <g>AU)TOU=</g> (=c(a?)q(B) 236 [etc.])] >(>6) Bc*(~)q* OE(f)  
RT 01 02(1901) <g>*NWEMIN</g> (R)] >(>6) Bc*(~)q* OE(f)  
  
RT 01 04(0501) <g>*MWABI/TIDAS</g> (=A)] 
RT 01 04(0502)  : <g>*MWABEI/TIDAS *B  
  
RT 01 15(1301) <g>H(</g>] > B  
  
RT 02 12(0901) <g>KAI\</g>] > Ba 
  
RT 02 16(1401) <g>A)/FETE</g> AMNabdefhijkmqrsuxb2 OA OE(c) OS] > Bca2 OC  
                              OL (?) 
  
RT 03 16(1601) <g>*TI/S</g> Aacgloxe2 OC OS] > B 
RT 03 16(1701) <g>EI)=</g> Aacgloxe2 OC OS] > Bbna2 OE 
  
RT 04 13(0801) <g>KAI\</g>] > Ba2-OE(f)(>9) blgnowe2 
RT 04 13(0901) <g>E)GENH/QH</g>] > Ba2-OE(f)(>9) blgnowe2  
RT 04 13(1001) <g>AU)TW=|</g>] > Ba2-OE(f)(>9) OL  
RT 04 13(1101) <g>EI)S</g> (OS sub &)] > Ba2-OE(f)(>9) bglnw OE(c) OL  
RT 04 13(1201) <g>GUNAI=KA</g> (OS sub &)] > Ba2-OE(f)(>9) OL  
RT 04 13(1401) <g>KAI\</g>] > Ba2-OE(f)(>9) OE(c)(>4)  
RT 04 13(1501) <g>EI)SH=LQEN</g>] > Ba2-OE(f)(>9) OE(c)(>4)  
RT 04 13(1601) <g>PRO\S</g>] > Ba2-OE(f)(>9) OE(c)(>4) 
RT 04 13(1701) <g>AU)TH/N</g>] > Ba2-OE(f)(>9) OE(c)(>4) 
  
RT 04 15(2201) <g>SOU</g>] > B 
  
RT 04 19(1301) <g>*AMINADAB</g> A] 
RT 04 19(1303)  : <g>*AMEINADAB</g> BMNacdegijklmnopqrtuvwxya2b2e2 
  
RT 04 20(0201) <g>*AMINADAB</g> A OC OL] 
RT 04 20(0203)  : <g>*AMEINADAB</g> BMNabcdegijklmnopqrtuvwxya2b2e2  

//end of article//