Soojin
Susan Oh
SARS
– 013
12
/ 15 / 2000
Explanation
for the Gender Differences in Expressing Emotions
The expression and interpretation of emotions play an important part in human interactions. The processes involved in the encoding and decoding of emotional expressions have been the subject of numerous studies. Specifically, the face is a very important area and a channel of nonverbal communication that plays a significant role in human emotions. More than any other body part, the face instantaneously communicates, readily reveals, and exhibits the emotional states. The face is a rich source of information for human behavior. Facial displays not only indicate emotion, but also regulate interpersonal behavior and signal communicative intent. The main parts of the face that are involved in the nonverbal communication are as follows:
1) Lip movements
2) Lifting / shrinking the cheeks
3) Eye brows & their movements
4) Eyelids and their movements
One could view and focus on these different areas of the face and come to conclusions in regard to some emotions. Thus, the ultimate aim of linking an area of the face with specified emotion or emotions is to aid communication, which in turn modifies the words spoken. They often permit the depiction of meaning that may be difficult or impossible to convey in words. Facial areas may differ in terms of their relative involvements of affect-specific components and non-affective movements. Particularly, positively affective situations are most easily judged from the raising brows and cheeks whereas sadness is best judged from the eyes and eyelids area.
Gender Differences in
Face & Emotion:
A major item of expression via face
is the expression of emotions. Facial expressions of emotions are very specific
in a sense that there are specific conventions for their interpretation. There
is not a significant gender difference when identifying the underlying
neurophysical processes of emotions. Emotions are believed to be the work of
three inner-related components: neural activity, striate muscle or
facial-postural activity, and subjective experience. The feedback provided by
the facial muscle contractions reveals the immediate experience of emotion. The
subjective experience leads on to complex patterns in the neural mechanisms
that arouse the diffused hypothalamic cortical system while the sensory motor
area in the cortex is excited through specific tactile facial receptors.
However, modern psychological
researches indicate that men and women possess different skills related to the
sending and receiving of emotion. In general, women are more emotionally
expressive (Miller, 1976), whereas men conceal or control their emotional
displays (Buck, Miller, & Caul, 1974). In addition to their encoding ability,
women tend to express emotion through facial expression and interpersonal
communication, whereas men generally express emotion through actions such as
engaging in aggressive, dangerous, or distracting behavior.
For smiling in social interaction, Hall (1984)
concluded that, in the 15 studies for which the effect size could be
calculated, the average point-biserial correlation, r, between sex and amount
of smiling was .30. Over 90% of the studies showed more females than males
smiling, and over 50% found this difference to be statistically significant. It
was also found that the smiling difference was greatly reduced in less social
situations for females. Furthermore, research has uncovered fairly reliable sex
differences in the experience and expression of sadness. Substantial evidence
shows that women are more likely to be sad and engage in more interpersonal
communication about their problems. From these gathered information and
previous studies, many questions are left unanswered. Do women encode their
emotions better in all situations? Are women facially more expressive? If so,
is this an inherent tendency? or a product of socialization and cultural
expectations?
Previous research on nonverbal communication
has demonstrated that females, in general, are more emotionally expressive
than males (Buck, Savin, Miller, & Caul, 1972). An alternative way of
interpreting the above finding is that females are not simply more facially
reactive but rather more emotionally reactive in general. If this is the case,
then this reactivity should be reflected by the experiences of emotionally
charged situations. The purpose of my experiment is to demonstrate that when
exposed to emotion-provoking situation, females would be more facially reactive.
Furthermore, the basis of their facial reactivity may be due to the combination
of the emotion-charged situation itself and the gender role expectations.
In order to carry out the testing, three conditions had to be created to produce different emotions in the subjects. Each card read a sentence conveying a situation in which a specific emotion is to be produced.
(1) My dog died today.
(2) I am SO~~~~ happy today~!!!!
(3) I am a student.
These three sentences were pre-written on separate cards for the subject to see before reading it out loud. The first sentence conveys a negative emotion: sadness, trauma, broken-heartedness, and emotional pain. The second sentence suggests a sense of joy, happiness, delight, and pleasure. Finally, the third sentence expresses a neutral state. The experiment was conducted at University of Pennsylvania. As the students randomly walked by the lobby of Gregory House, the locust walk, the lecture rooms, and the dining halls, 100 subjects (50 male, 50 female) were asked to read each of the three sentences given. These three cards were presented to a student separately as they were asked to imagine the situation given by the sentence, pretend experiencing the appropriate emotions in the context of each sentence, and say the sentence as if they are talking to their friend at that very moment.
As each subject read the sentences out loud, the
subject’s facial expressions, particularly the movement of eyebrows, lips, and
eyes were observed. When subjects were reading the first sentence revealing the
negative-emotional state, eyebrows relaxing or lowering toward the center,
slightly lowered lips (drooping), and the eyes were observed. When the subjects
were reading the second sentence conveying the positive-emotional state, high
eyebrows, the movement of cheek and lips (smiling), and the eyes were observed.
With regard to the third sentence carrying the neutral tone, the eyebrows, the
movement of cheeks and lips, and the eyes were observed to see if any facial
expression could still be detected.
The following charts and graph show the data obtained:
<Chart 1.1> Observed Changes in Facial Expressions
of Male and Female Subjects (“My dog died today.”)
MALE FEMALE
1. Y Y Y
1. Y Y
2. Y Y 2. Y Y Y
3. Y 3. Y Y Y
4. Y 4. Y Y
5. Y Y 5. Y
6. 6. Y Y Y
7. 7. Y Y
8. Y 8. Y Y
9. 9. Y
10. Y 10. Y Y Y
11. 11. Y Y
12.
Y 12.
Y
13. 13. Y Y Y
14. 14. Y Y Y
15. Y 15. Y Y
16. Y 16. Y Y
17. Y Y Y 17. Y Y
18. Y 18. Y Y
19. 19. Y Y
20. Y Y 20. Y Y
21. Y 21. Y Y Y
22. Y Y 22. Y Y
23. Y 23. Y Y Y
24. Y Y 24. Y Y Y
25. 25. Y Y Y
26. 26. Y Y
27. Y 27. Y
28. Y Y 28. Y Y
29. Y 29. Y Y Y
30. Y 30. Y Y Y
31. Y Y 31. Y Y
32. Y Y 32. Y Y
33. Y 33. Y
34. 34. Y Y
35. Y 35. Y Y Y
36. Y 36. Y Y
37. Y Y Y 37. Y
38. Y Y 38. Y Y
39. 39. Y Y
40. Y 40. Y Y
41. Y 41. Y Y
42. Y 42. Y Y
43. Y 43. Y Y Y
44. Y Y 44. Y Y Y
45.
Y 45. Y Y
46. Y Y 46. Y Y
47. Y 47. Y Y Y
48. Y 48. Y Y
49. Y Y Y 49. Y Y Y
50. 50. Y Y
<Chart 1.2> Observed Changes in Facial Expressions of Male and Female Subjects (I am SO Happy today!)
1. Y Y 1. Y Y Y
2. Y 2. Y Y
3. Y Y 3. Y Y Y
4. Y 4. Y Y
5. Y 5. Y Y
6. Y 6. Y Y Y
7. 7. Y Y Y
8. Y 8. Y Y Y
9. Y 9. Y Y
10. Y 10. Y Y
11. 11. Y Y
12. Y 12. Y Y
13. Y 13. Y Y Y
14. Y 14. Y Y
15. Y Y 15. Y Y
16. Y 16. Y Y
17. Y Y 17. Y Y
18. Y Y 18. Y Y
19. Y Y 19. Y Y
20. Y Y 20. Y Y Y
21. Y 21. Y Y
22. Y 22. Y
23. 23. Y Y
24. Y 24.
25. 25.
26. 26. Y
27. Y Y 27. Y Y Y
28. Y 28. Y Y Y
29. 29. Y Y
30. Y Y 30. Y Y
31.
Y 31. Y Y Y
32. 32. Y Y
33. 33. Y
34. Y Y 34. Y Y
35. Y 35. Y Y
36. Y Y 36. Y Y Y
37. Y 37. Y Y Y
38. Y 38. Y Y
39. Y 39.
40. 40.
41. 41. Y Y
42. Y 42. Y Y Y
43. Y 43. Y Y Y
44. 44. Y Y
45. Y 45. Y Y
46. Y 46. Y Y Y
47. 47. Y Y
48. 48. Y Y
49. 49. Y Y Y
50. 50. Y Y
<Chart 1.3> Observed Changes in Facial Expressions
of Male and Female Subjects (I am a student.)
MALE FEMALE
1. 1. Y Y
2. 2. Y
3. Y 3. Y Y Y
4. 4. Y
5. 5. Y Y
6. 6. Y
7. 7.
8. 8.
9. Y Y 9. Y
10. Y 10. Y Y
11. 11. Y
12. Y Y 12.
13. 13. Y Y
14. 14.
15. Y 15. Y
16. 16. Y Y
17. 17. Y
18. 18. Y
19. 19. Y Y
20. Y 20. Y
21. 21. Y Y
22. 22. Y
23. 23. Y
24. Y 24.
25. 25. Y
26. 26.
27. 27.
28. 28.
29. 29.
30. 30. Y Y Y
31. 31.
32 Y Y 32.
33. 33.
34. 34.
35. 35. Y
36. 36. Y Y
37. 37.
38. 38.
39. 39. Y Y Y
40. Y Y 40. Y Y
41. Y 41. Y Y
42. Y Y 42. Y Y
43. Y Y 43.
44. 44. Y
45. 45. Y
46. 46. Y
47. 47. Y
48. 48. Y Y
49. Y Y 49. Y Y
50. 50. Y Y Y
Graphs
ANALYSIS OF RESULTS
According to the gathered data, the female subjects frequently displayed more types of facial reactions compared to the male subjects and encoded the emotional components of the first two sentences more effectively as well. For the first sentence, the most dramatic gender difference can be found in the movement of lips (17 vs. 40). For the second sentence, female subjects raised their eyebrows and moved the cheeks and lips to smile twice as many times as the male subjects did. However, the most significant difference can be found in the movement of eyes (17 vs. 35 and 21 vs. 44). Female subjects moved their eyes to show bigger smile or an expression of joy and happiness three times as much as the male subjects did (8 vs. 26). Therefore, the frequency of females’ facial expressions dramatically dominates over that of males’ facial expressions. Now, to answer the second raised questions, the third graph can be incorporated in this analysis to be compared to the first two. Interestingly, the female subjects still revealed more facial reactions to the neutral third sentence than the male subjects did. According to the graph, the female subjects raised their eyebrows and moved up their cheeks and lips to smile nearly three times as much as the male subjects did (6 vs. 18 and 8 vs. 25). Moreover, the female subjects also moved their eyes to smile twice as much as the male subjects did. These experiment findings reveals a significant basis for the fact that women, in general, smile more even when the situation does not call for it. In addition, these results prove that women’s motives in smiling are not perceptively tuned to situational demands (sentences) as men’s are. Moreover, women’s smile may not be entirely consistent with messages conveyed in the verbal or voice-tone channels.
Based on the comparisons from the data and chart, it is justified to conclude that sex differences for smiling and expressing sadness are relatively large. It is obvious that males and females differed in facial reactivity in the present experiment. Additionally, this experiment revealed that nonverbal communication, specifically, facial reactions such as eyebrow movement and expressions, supports the verbal message (sentences) individuals attempt to communicate. When “My dog died today” sentence was being read by the female subjects, most women made a droopy face or gloomy look to indicate the pain they are feeling inside. However, for the male subjects, many of their faces were expressionless, displaying more resentment and anguish than sadness or pain. Hence, it is possible that males either are poor emotion encoders or have difficulty displaying their emotions externally. Finally, this experiment specifically demonstrated that females are more facially expressive than males in emotion-provoking situations. However, this result of gender differences on facial expressiveness can also be explained in other plausible ways. For instance, there could be genetic dissimilarities or that males and females socially and cognitively learned to express emotions differently. However, how this difference should be interpreted is not obvious. For instance, there could be genetic dissimilarities such as different mediation by the central nervous system or peripheral dissimilarities resulting in different facial reactivity (Schwartz et al., 1980). Another explanation could be that males and females have learned to express emotions differently (Brody & Hall, 1993). Furthermore, a third factor may be that females have a more sensitive perceptual ability and therefore react more intensely.
Nonverbal
Behavior:
It has been estimated that anywhere
between 50 to 80 percent of the meanings in a conversation is communicated
nonverbally. The same words can take on quite different meanings depending on
one's facial expression, gestures, voice tone, and inflection. For example,
depending on the nonverbal cues, the three words "I love you" could
mean sarcasm, indifference (suggesting that the speaker said them only to try
to placate the other), disbelief (I love you?), true devotion, or a variety of
things in between. Furthermore, the research findings indicate that women are
more skilled at interpreting nonverbal behavior. Conflict theorists explain
this as a protective measure. They note that those who are less powerful (women
and minorities) have a greater need to know what the more powerful people with
whom they interact are really thinking and planning. Hall also notes that
almost universally, women are expected to be and appear to be pleasant (Hall,
p.66). Hence, women might smile as an active strategy of appeasement or for
purely habitual reasons by internalizing the norms, which they perceive to
apply to their own sex. But women also use somewhat different kinds of
nonverbal behavior, and they use both differences
in communicating and interpreting nonverbal behavior to enhance their ability
to form and maintain intimate relationships. From an early age, females are
superior in communicating nonverbal emotional messages. In fact, boys seem to
get poorer at sending nonverbal emotional messages as they get older. Overall,
then, women's nonverbal behavior suggests that they are warm, friendly, and
attentive to others. Men's nonverbal behavior suggests that they have high
status and are important and somewhat distant.
The use of face is constrained and facilitated by socialization processes in every society. The individuals also bring to bear upon the processes of communication their own personal characteristics and styles. In addition, facial expressions for a specific content could vary not only from age to age of an individual’s life but also across different cultural settings.
Overall, my experiment showed that facial expressions of emotions convey not only information about emotional states of people, but also about their interpersonal intentions. This finding was especially true for females, who were, in fact, more facially reactive in situations where the expression of positive and negative emotions was called for. Secondly, the females also seemed to display more facial reactions than males due to social stereotypes even when the encoding of emotion was not necessary. This second finding seems especially more significant, because females seemed to be more facially expressive (i.e. – smiling) even when the third sentence they read had no related emotions. Hence, women might be emotionally reactive in general, to emphasize the intensity of emotions they are feeling and to interpersonally communicate themselves to others. Or women might perceive the social expectations placed upon them as the norm and behave accordingly. As Hall suggests, smiling may reflect (1) Habit acquired by observation or reinforcement, (2) Warmth, friendliness, or pleasure, (3) Appeasement, or (4) Social unease or nervousness (Hall, 1979). Comparing the nonsocial with the social data in Hall’s article also leads to the conclusion that the sex difference is a social phenomenon that develops sometime between early childhood and adulthood. “Thus, women may show more smiling not for any immediate or conscious purpose, such as to display deference, but rather because of a lifetime of subtle pressure to internalize cultural expectations” (Hall, pp. 71). Hence, it could be concluded that this result would strongly indicate that the different norms to which men and women subscribe are “norms of expressiveness” rather than “norm of pleasantness” (Hall, pp.72).
Furthermore, this
experiment should also take into consideration that the decoder’s bias may
have played a role in interpreting emotional reactivity on the faces of male
and female subjects, because emotions are more easily judged from women’s
than from men’s faces, as Noller suggests. The opinions concerning what men
and women can or should express emotionally can modify the interpretations
of their actual expressions. This bias, which can be produced by stereotypes
concerning the expression of emotions, lead to different perceptions of men’s
and women’s emotional facial expression when in fact they are both displaying
exactly the same emotion. Further studies can show that sexual stereotypes
concerning emotional manifestation can play a role during the decoding of
emotional facial expressions even when the encoding differences are controlled.
These results can lead us to modify our view of sex differences in emotions
by removing at least some of the responsibility for observed bias from the
encoder and attributing it to the decoder. This suggests that the recognition
of emotional facial expressions is yet another field where stereotypes concerning
group membership can have an influence. It is therefore possible that yet
unidentified emotional stereotypes can modify the perception and interpretation
of visual and contextual information linked to the facial expression of emotions.
It would be interesting to be able to identify these stereotypes and to see
whether these differences generalize to male encoders.
1) Ashmore, R.D. & Del
Broca, F.K. (1981). Conceptual approaches to stereotypes and stereotyping. In
D.L. Hamilton, (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup
behavior (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum. Biernat, M.R. & Vescion,
T.K. (1993). Categorization and stereotyping: Effect of group context on memory
and social judgement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29,
166-202.
2) Canary, Daniel J. &
Dindia, Kathryn (1998). Sex
Differences and Similarities in Communication Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
3) Eakins, B. & Eakins, G. "Silent sounds and secret messages”, Sex Differences in Human Communication. Palo Alto: Houghton Mifflin Co., (pp.147-179).
4) Ekman, P. & Friesen,
W. V. (1969) Nonverbal Leakage & Cues to Deception. Psychiatry, 32, pp. 88-106.
5) Hall, J. (1979). Gender, Gender Roles, & Nonverbal
Communication Skills. Ch. 5 (pp. 58-72)
6) Harper, Robert G., &
Matarazzo, Joseph D., & Wiens, Arthur N. (1978). Nonverbal Communication: The State of the Art. (pp. 1-15,
77-112, 181-189) Newyork: John Wiley
& Sons.
7) Noller, Patricia
(1984). Nonverbal Communication and
Marital Interaction. Oxford:
Pergamon Press, (Ch. 8).
8)Zuckerman, M. & Lipets,
M., Koivumaki, J. & Rosenthal, R.
(1975). “Encoding & Decoding
Nonverbal Cues of Emotion”; Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
Vol. 32, pp. 1068-71.