Next: Other address forms.
Up: Hortative ÁÔ£ laam
Previous: Hortative ÁÔ£ laam
The suffix ÁÔ£ laamI treat this
suffix as if it were one unit; historically it is probably derived from the
verbal noun forms that end in ǧ al plus ÈÞ£ aakum
`it will become', i.e. ؽԴ§ + ÈÞ£ pookal + aakum
`going will become'. Since ÈÞ£ aakum is now reduced to
ȣ aam and the verbal noun forms in ǧ are rare in ST, I prefer the
analysis presented here. is added to the INFINITIVE (cf. § xxx below
of the verb. Examples: ؽԴÁÔ£ poohalaam `let's go',
½Ô¡´ÁÔ£ paakkalaam `let's see'. This form is homophonous
with the modal ÁÔ£ laam `one may (do something)'. The
semantic difference becomes obvious when an answer is given---the affirmative
answer to the hortative is ¶ÀÕ sari `all right, okay', while
the affirmative answer to the modal is Ⱦԣ aamaam `yes'.
- Question:
- ؽԴÁÔ¾Ô? poohalaamaa? `Shall we go?'
- Answer:
- ¶ÀÕ sari `Okay, let's.'
- Question:
- ؽԴÁÔ¾Ô? poohalaamaa? `May (I) go?'
- Answer:
- Ⱦԣ ؽԴÁÔ£ aamaam, poohalaam `Yes, you may.'
In the hortative, the addressee is understood as included in the exhortation.
Therefore, if used without deleted pronoun, the inclusive 1st person
plural ¼Ô¾ naama must be chosen. If used with the exclusive
¼Ôõ´ naanga it cannot mean `let's' but only `one may'. Thus:
- Question:
- ¼Ô¾ ؽԴÁÔ¾Ô? naama poohalaamaa? `Shall we go?'
- Answer:
- ¶ÀÕ sari `Okay, let's.'
- Question:
- ¼Ôõ´ ؽԴÁÔ¾Ô? naanga poohalaamaa?
`Is it all right for us to go, may we go? '
- Answer:
- Ⱦԣ aamaam `Yes, you may.'
Vasu Renganathan
Sat Nov 2 21:16:08 EST 1996