The Homeric Papyri in the UPenn Collections
by Allison Traweek (=AT, December 2006) and Robert Kraft (=RAK, April
2009), with textcritical analysis by Arthur Jones
Eleven fragments of Homer have been identified thus far in the
University of Pennsylvania papyri
collections. Seven are from the Oxyrhynchos finds and are described
very briefly by
Grenfell and Hunt in those early POxy volumes. Another is from the
Fayyum collection and is also
described briefly there. The remaining three are of unknown provenance.
If we assume that literary rolls originally would
have been writtenalong the fibers [--], the following five pieces
probably come from
such rolls (two of them have been reused for other purposes):
- E02772
(PFay 310) on -- side Od 11.557-573, 588-610 (roll, 1-2 ce); reused on
|| for a few letters in a 2nd c cursive
hand
- E02817
(POxy 776) on -- side, Od 4.520-529 (roll, 1/2 ce); blank ||
- E02818 (POxy 778)
on -- side, Od 10.26-50 (roll, 2/3 ce) [on display, 3rd floor]; reused
on || for a letter (3 ce)
- E02821
(POxy 775) on -- side, Od 4.388-400 (roll, 3 ce); blank ||
- E03076
(POxy 948) 2 frgs, on -- side, Il 10.233-243, 250-255 (roll, 3 ce)
[reconstruct page?], blank ||
There are also three fragments from codices (or at least from double
sided pages), making it possible to reconstruct the original page
format:
- E02816
(POxy 782) Od 17.137-148, 182-193 (codex, 3 ce)
- E02819
(POxy 781) Od 16.243-256, 288-301 (codex, 3 ce)
- E16586 codex, Il
12.128ff, 156-163
[RAK identification 23je1994]
That leaves three fragments with the Homeric material written
against the fibers, probably reusing discarded papyrus for whatever
purpose (e.g. school exercises, excerpts):
- E02815
(POxy 762) on reused || side, Il 7.1-30, 32-35 (reused 3 ce);
untranscribed list
of names on -- (roll, 2/3 ce)
- E16697.32 on reused || side, Il 11.425-437 [RAK
identification 24je1994], traces of something else on --
- PPennLib001 on reused || side, Od
4.803-817; traces of different hand on --
Most of the pieces have been dated to the 1st through 3rd centuries
of the common era and are written in more or less neat unicals. The
Homeric passages covered are Iliad 7.1-35 (lacking 31),
10.233-255 (with a lacuna from 244-249), 11.425-437, and 12.128-163
(with a lacuna from 13?-155); Odyssey 4.388-400, 4.520-529,
4.803-817, 10.26-50, 11.557-610 (with a lacuna from 577-587, and
lacking 604), 16.243-256, and 17.137-193 (with a lacuna from 149-181).
In what follows we will proceed in the order of the inventory numbers,
starting with the 10 fragments in the Museum collection. The basic text
is from the TLG, which uses for the Iliad T.W. Allen, Homeri
Ilias, vols. 2-3 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1931: 2:1-356;
3:1-370), and for the Odyssey P. von der Mühll, Homeri
Odyssea (Basel: Helbing & Lichtenhahn, 1962: 1-456). Reference
is also made to M.L. West's critical edition of the Iliad,
(Stutgart: B.G. Teubner, 1998).
PPennMuseum E02772(PFay
310) [RAK]
Homer, Odyssey 11.557-573, 588-610 (roll, 1-2 ce) 12.3 cm
high x 7.6 cm wide.
Parts of two columns of a roll, in stichoi, with an estimated 32
stichoi per column, written along
the fibers [--] "in medium-sized uncials. Late first or second century"
(G-H). The hand is strictly bilinear (letters about 0.3 cm tall),
except that the upper and lower ends of the vertical stroke of phi and
psi are extended. The letter
forms of mu (deeply rounded in the middle), kappa (almost like IS), ksi
and zeta (very similar), along with ample use of small serifs, suggest
possibly a slightly earlier date (turn of the era). The preserved upper
margin is just over 2 cm high, and the vertical space between columns
varies considerably from zero to more than 2 cm wide. If the lower
margin were also about 2 cm or slightly more, the total height of the
roll would have been approximately 20 to 21 cm. The approximate width
of the original columns of writing would have been about 12 cm (with an
uneven right margin). The text has few
variations from standard editions (see the notes), but does not include
line 604. There is no evidence of diacritics or punctuation or spacing
between words. Some areas are severely abraded, and the letters that
probably were found there are left in black within the red
reconstructions below. The base text printed below is from the TLG.
The other
side has a few barely legible letters (doodling? and at a
slight angle) in three very short groups in a "second
century cursive" (G-H) written against the fibers [||], but is
otherwise blank except for the archaeologists' note "A B14" --
presumably the find location.
column 1 (556-587)
τοῖος γάρ σφιν πύργος ἀπώλεο·
σεῖο δ’ Ἀχαιοὶ]
ἶσον Ἀχιλλῆος κεφαλῇ Πηληϊάδαο]
ἀχνύμεθα φθιμένοιο διαμπερές·
οὐδέ τις ἄλ]λος
αἴτιος, ἀλλὰ Ζεὺς Δαναῶν στρατὸν
αἰχμητάω]ν
ἐκπάγλως ἤχθηρε, τεῒν δ’ ἐπὶ
μοῖραν ἔθηκεν.] (560)
ἀλλ’ ἄγε δεῦρο, ἄναξ, ἵν’ ἔπος
καὶ μῦθον ἀκού]σῃς
ἡμέτερον· δάμασον δὲ μένος καὶ
ἀγήνορα ]θυμόν.’
ὣς ἐφάμην, ὁ δέ μ’
οὐδὲν ἀμείβετο, βῆ δὲ μετ’ ἄ]λλας
ψυχὰς εἰς Ἔρεβος νεκύων
κατατεθνηώτων.]
ἔνθα χ’ ὅμως προσέφη κεχολωμένος,
ἤ κεν ἐγὼ τ]όν· (565)
ἀλλά μοι ἤθελε θυμὸς ἐνὶ στήθεσσι
φίλοισι]
τῶν ἄλλων ψυχὰς ἰδέειν
κατατεθνηώτων.]
ἔνθ’ ἦ τοι Μίνωα ἴδον, Διὸς
ἀγλαὸν υἱόν,]
χρύσεον σκῆπτρον ἔχοντα
θεμιστεύοντα νέκυ]σσιν,
ἥμενον· οἱ δέ μιν ἀμφὶ δίκας
εἴροντο ἄνακτα,] (570)
ἥμενοι ἑσταότες τε, κατ’
εὐρυπυλὲς Ἄϊδος δῶ.]
τὸν δὲ μέτ’ Ὠρίωνα
πελώριον εἰσενόησα]
θῆρας ὁμοῦ εἰλεῦντα κατ’
ἀσφοδελὸν λειμῶν]α,
τοὺς αὐτὸς κατέπεφνεν ἐν
οἰοπόλοισιν ὄρεσσι,]
χερσὶν ἔχων ῥόπαλον παγχάλκεον,
αἰὲν ἀαγές.] (575)
καὶ Τιτυὸν εἶδον,
Γαίης ἐρικυδέος υἱόν,]
κείμενον ἐν δαπέδῳ. ὁ δ’ ἐπ’
ἐννέα κεῖτο πέλεθρα,
γῦπε δέ μιν ἑκάτερθε παρημένω
ἧπαρ ἔκειρον,
δέρτρον ἔσω δύνοντες· ὁ δ’ οὐκ
ἀπαμύνετο χερσί.
Λητὼ γὰρ ἕλκησε, Διὸς κυδρὴν
παράκοιτιν, (580)
Πυθώδ’ ἐρχομένην διὰ καλλιχόρου
Πανοπῆος.
καὶ μὴν Τάνταλον
εἰσεῖδον χαλέπ’ ἄλγε’ ἔχοντα,
ἑσταότ’ ἐν λίμνῃ· ἡ δὲ προσέπλαζε
γενείῳ.
στεῦτο δὲ διψάων, πιέειν δ’ οὐκ
εἶχεν ἑλέσθαι·
ὁσσάκι γὰρ κύψει’ ὁ γέρων πιέειν
μενεαίνων, (585)
τοσσάχ’ ὕδωρ ἀπολέσκετ’
ἀναβροχέν, ἀμφὶ δὲ ποσσὶ
γαῖα μέλαινα φάνεσκε, καταζήνασκε
δὲ δαίμων.
column 2 (588-620, without 604)
δένδρ[ε]α δ’ ὑψιπέτη[λα κατὰ
κρῆθεν χέε καρπόν,
ὄγχνα[ι]
καὶ ῥοιαὶ κα[ὶ
μηλέαι ἀγλαόκαρποι
συκέαι τε γλυκεραὶ[ καὶ ἐλαῖαι τηλεθόωσαι· (590)
τῶν ὁπό[τ’
ἰθ]ύσει’ ὁ γέ[ρων
ἐπὶ χερσὶ μάσασθαι,
τὰς δ’ ἄνεμος
ῥίπτασ[κε ποτὶ νέφεα σκιόεντα.
καὶ
μὴν Σίσυφον ε[ἰσεῖδον κρατέρ’ ἄλγε’ ἔχοντα,
λᾶαν
βαστάζοντα π[ελώριον ἀμφοτέρῃσιν.
ἦ τοι ὁ μὲν
σκηριπτό[μενος χερσίν τε ποσίν τε (595)
λᾶαν ἄνω
ὤθεσκε ποτ[ὶ λόφον· ἀλλ’ ὅτε μέλλοι
ἄκρον
ὑπερβαλέειν[, τότ’ ἀποστρέψασκε Κραταιΐς·
αὖτις ἔπειτα
πέδονδε κ[υλίνδετο λᾶας ἀναιδής.
αὐτὰρ ὅ γ’ ἂψ
ὤσασκετιτ[αινόμενος, κατὰ δ’ ἱδρὼς
ἔρρεεν ἐκ
μελέων, κον[ίη δ’ ἐκ κρατὸς ὀρώρει. (600)
τὸν
δὲ μέτ’ εἰσενόησα[ βίην Ἡρακληείην,
εἴδωλον·
αὐτὸς δὲ μετ’[ ἀθανάτοισι θεοῖσι
τέρπεται ἐν
θαλίῃς κα[ὶ ἔχει καλλίσφυρον Ἥβην,
[παῖδα Διὸς μεγάλοιο καὶ Ἥρης χρυσοπεδίλου.]
ἀμφὶ δέ μιν
κλαγγὴ ν[εκύων ἦν οἰωνῶν ὥς, (605)
πάντοσ’ ἀτυζομένω[ν· ὁ δ’ ἐρεμνῇ νυκτὶ ἐοικώς,
γυμνὸν τόξον
ἔχων[ καὶ ἐπὶ νευρῆφιν ὀϊστόν,
δεινὸν παπταίνω[ν, αἰεὶ βαλέοντι ἐοικώς.
σμερδαλέος δέ
οἱ ἀ[μφὶ περὶ στήθεσσιν ἀορτὴρ
χρύσεος ἦν τελαμών, ἵνα θέσκελα
ἔργα τέτυκτο, (610)
ἄρκτοι τ’ ἀγρότεροί τε σύες
χαροποί τε λέοντες,
ὑσμῖναί τε μάχαι τε φόνοι τ’
ἀνδροκτασίαι τε.
μὴ τεχνησάμενος μηδ’ ἄλλο τι
τεχνήσαιτο,
ὃς κεῖνον τελαμῶνα ἑῇ ἐγκάτθετο
τέχνῃ.
ἔγνω δ’ αἶψ’ ἐμὲ κεῖνος, ἐπεὶ
ἴδεν ὀφθαλμοῖσι, (615)
καί μ’ ὀλοφυρόμενος ἔπεα
πτερόεντα προσηύδα·
‘διογενὲς Λαερτιάδη, πολυμήχαν’ Ὀδυσσεῦ,
ἆ δείλ’, ἦ τινὰ καὶ σὺ κακὸν
μόρον ἡγηλάζεις,
ὅν περ ἐγὼν ὀχέεσκον ὑπ’ αὐγὰς
ἠελίοιο.
Ζηνὸς μὲν πάϊς ἦα Κρονίονος,
αὐτὰρ ὀϊζὺν (620)
Line Notes:
- 561: No iota adscript.
- 562: Moves almost across the entire intercolumn space.
- 569: Uses all the available space between columns. Nu at end?
- [the gap between columns would have held about 11 lines,
producing a column of about 32 lines]
- 588 the papyrus is damaged at the end of the first word of this
line but seems to read Θ’ (= ΤΕ? Theta is also read by G-H) where Δ is
expected (uness the final Α of the word is taken as a Δ and the Θ as an
Ε); the next letter, Υ, is in a severely damaged area. Van Thiel's
manuscripts FHMB also read Θ’. His ℙ1102a (=Priest, Homeric Papyri
in the Michigan Collection, [diss. Michigan, 1975] #36= P.Mich.
inv. 1202+1203+1209), late 2nd cent., also has a Θ.
- 590: This line is lacking from Van Thiel's ℙ1102a, while the
current papyrus from a similar era does have the line. It is also
missing from manuscript U.
- 591 ΙΘ]ΥΣΙ (so G-H) -- or ΥΕΙ? The papyrus is badly damaged here
- 596 ΑΝΩ ΘΕΣΚΕ (only one Ω) is on the papyrus. Allen does not give
an indication that other manuscripts or papyri also have only one Ω.
- 600 ΕΓ ΜΕΛΕΩΝ
- 603 no iota adscript
- 604 Lacking in this papyrus as well as Van Thiel's ℙ1102 and PHHs.
- 605 surface abraded after ΜΙΝ
- 609 There seems to be a letter (Υ ?) between the initial Σ and
the Μ, or the Μ is exceptionally wide. Allen notes no variations at
this point. Tape covers the presumed letters ΟΙ Α
PPennMuseum E02815
(POxy 762) [AT, with RAK]
Homer, Iliad
7.1-30, 32-35 (reused panel [||], 3 ce); three
adjoining fragments; 19.8 cm high x 8.5 cm wide
The Homer material is written "in small upright uncials" (about .25 cm
tall) against the fibers [||] on the back of a list
of names (?? untranscribed?) which is written along the
fibers [--] "in a cursive hand" and dated to "the late second or early
third century" by G-H. Thus the Homer is probably an excerpt, dating to
the third century (G-H), perhaps a "school exercise" of some sort. In this
image, the three fragments have been moved to their proper
positions electronically. Parts of a full column of 34 lines are
preserved (line 31 is missing), with top (1.6 cm) and bottom (2.7 cm)
margins as well. The start of a second column to the right is also in
evidence (leftmost traces of a few letters), with the intercolumn
irregular but averaging about 1.5 -2.0 cm. Whether the second column
was continuous with the first is not clear, although the scanty
evidence is largely consistent with such a possibility. There is no
evidence of a heading above line one at the top of the main column. The
surface of the papyrus is badly abraded in spots (and possibly also
with an occasional overlay), and there are many holes as well,
consistent with vertical rolling and/or crushing.
Between the columns at lines 9-10 a second
hand has written in larger, more careless letters, AUTAI (? AUTON?),
but its significance is not clear. No diacritical markings are evident
except for a dieresis over the final iota in line 19, and no
punctuation or spacing. Iota adscript is frequent (2, 6, 18, 22, ),
sometimes where it is not expected (33, 34), and the nu-moveable is
present at the end of line 5. Occasional ligatures occur, and the hand
has a somewhat "sloppy" look due partly to the thickness of the heavy
black ink strokes, and also to inconsistent vertical alignment of some
of the letters. Notable features include a left-leaning tail on the top
of the delta, a mu with a deep (but not always smoothly executed) U
middle, and a nu in which the middle stroke reaches the lower
extremity of the right vertical stroke. The occasional variations from
the standard TLG text are recorded in the line notes.
column 1
(1-30, 32-35)
Ὣς εἰπὼν πυλέ]ων ἐξέσσυτο φαίδιμος Ἕκτωρ, (1)
τῷ δ’ ἅμ’ Ἀλέξα]νδρος κί’ ἀδελφεός· ἐν
δ’ ἄρα θυμῷ
ἀμφότεροι μέμ]ασαν πολεμίζειν ἠδὲ μ[ά]χεσθαι.
ὡς δὲ θεὸς ναύ]τῃσιν ἐελδ[ο]μένοισιν ἔδωκεν
οὖρον, ἐπεί κε κ]άμ[ωσ]ιν ἐϋ[ξέ]στῃς ἐλάτῃσι (5)
πόντον ἐλαύν]ον[τε]ς,
καμάτῳ δ’ ὑπὸ γυῖα
λέλυνται,
ὣς ἄρα τὼ Τρώεσσ]ιν ἐελδομένοισι φανήτην.
Ἔνθ’ ἑλέτην ὃ μὲν ]υἱὸν Ἀρηϊθόοιο ἄνακτος
Ἄρνῃ ναιετάοντα ]Μενέσθιον, ὃν κορυνήτης
γείνατ’ Ἀρηΐθοος ]καὶ Φυλ[ο]μέδουσα βοῶπις· (10)
Ἕκτωρ δ’ Ἠϊονῆα βά]λ’ ἔγχε[ϊ] ὀξυόεντι
αὐχέν’ ὑπὸ στεφάν]ης εὐχάλκου, λύντο δὲ γυῖα.
Γλαῦκος δ’ Ἱππολό]χοιο [π]άϊς Λυκίων ἀγὸ[ς] ἀνδρῶν
Ἰφίνοον βάλε δου]ρὶ κατὰ κρατερὴν ὑσμίνην
Δεξιάδην ἵππω]ν
ἐπιάλμενον ὠκειάων (15)
ὦμον· ὃ δ’ ἐξ ἵππων ]χαμάδις πέσε, λύντο δὲ γυῖα.
Τοὺς δ’ ὡς οὖν ἐνόη]σε [θε]ὰ γλαυκῶπι[ς
Ἀθ]ήνη
Ἀργείους ὀλέκοντας ἐ]νὶ κρατερῇ ὑσμ[ίνῃ]
βῆ ῥα κατ’ Οὐλύμποι]ο κα[ρ]ήνων ἀΐξασ[α]
Ἴλιον εἰς ἱερήν· τῇ ]δ’ ἀντίος ὄρνυτ’ Ἀπόλλων (20)
Περγάμου ἐκκατιδώ]ν, Τ[ρ]ώεσσι δὲ βο[ύλετ]ο
νίκην·
ἀλλήλοισι δὲ τ]ώ γε συναντέσθην[
παρὰ ]φηγῷ.
τὴν πρότερος προ]σέειπεν ἄναξ
Διὸς υἱὸς Ἀπόλλων·
τίπτε σὺ δ’ αὖ μεμ]αυῖα Διὸς θύγατ[ε]ρ μεγάλοιο
ἦλθες ἀπ’ Οὐλύμ]ποιο, μέγας δέ σε θυμὸς ἀνῆκεν; (25)
ἦ ἵνα δὴ Δαναοῖ]σι μάχης ἑτερ[αλκ]έα νίκην
δῷς; ἐπεὶ οὔ τι Τ]ρῶας [ἀπολλυμέν]ους ἐλεαί[ρ]εις.
ἀλλ’ εἴ μοί τι πίθ]οιο τό κ[εν] πολὺ [κέρδιον εἴη·]
νῦν μὲν παύσω]μεν
πόλεμον καὶ δηϊο[τ]ῆτα
σήμερον· ὕστερο]ν αὖτε μαχήσοντ’{??} εἰς ὅ
κε τέκμωρ (30)
[Ἰλίου εὕρωσιν, ἐπεὶ ὣς φίλον
ἔπλετο θυμῷ]
ὑμῖν ἀθανάτῃσι, δι]απραθέειν τόδε ἄστυ.
Τὸν δ’ αὖτε πρ]οσέειπε[ θεὰ γλαυκ]ῶπις Ἀθή[ν]η·
ὧδ’ ἔστω ἑκάεργε· τὰ γὰρ φρονέουσ]α καὶ αὐτὴ
ἦλθον ἀπ’ Οὐλύμποιο μετὰ Τρῶας
κ]α[ὶ] Ἀχαιου[ς]. (35)
Line Notes:
- top margin: in the upper right corner, in red, is the POxy number
762
- 2: the letters ARA near the end seem to be partly covered by an
overlay
- 5: ends with an explicit nu
- 9-10: in the right margin, in a thinner, larger hand, are the
letters AUT.. (or LUT..). This could be a note about the alternate
reading in line 12.
- 12: the reading LUSE is the common reading for LUNTO, which von
der Mühll adopts. LUNTO appears in Aristarchus and the archetype of
West's MNP manuscripts. The curve of a Σ is clear after the Υ and
traces of other letters follow. Allen, in his OCT of the Iliad, says
that the current papyrus, his ℙ34, reads ΔΥΝΤΟ, but he is
mistaken for line 16.
- 16: Instead of the expected LUNTO, we find the "typo" DUNTO.
- 17-23: on the left side there appears to be an overlay
- 20: Where ORNUT is expected, the first letter seems to be W.
WRNUT is in West's Ω manuscripts, whereas ORNUT appears in his P and is
a correction in D.
- 30: where MAXHSONT' EIS is expected, we find . . . SOMEQ EIS.
This is the only source noted by West for this reading.
- 31: the entire line appears to be missing. No other source,
according to Allen omits it.
- 32: the letters AP or possibly ATH are visible, although too few
expected letters precede the former, and too many would precede the
latter; perhaps the absence of line 31 has created some confusion here
- 33-35: possibly an overlay at the left side
- 33: traces of a rounded letter are on the left (O,S,E, R) and the
line ends with a long iota stroke
- 34: this line also ends with a long iota stroke
column 2 (?? 36-68/69 ??)
(40) opposite line 5 or 6: the sharp lower left angle of A or D
ἀντίβιον
μαχέσασθαι ἐν αἰνῇ δηϊοτῆτι,
(41) next line: the start of a rounded stroke (probably O, E, S,
or W)
οἳ δέ
κ’ ἀγασσάμενοι χαλκοκνήμιδες Ἀχαιοὶ
(42): ink traces consistent with a rounded shape
οἶον
ἐπόρσειαν πολεμίζειν Ἕκτορι δίῳ.
(43): ink traces consistent with a vertical stroke
Ὣς ἔφατ’, οὐδ’ ἀπίθησε θεὰ
γλαυκῶπις Ἀθήνη.
(44) opposite 9: sharp lower left angle of A or D or tip of
horizontal of T or P
τῶν δ’ Ἕλενος Πριάμοιο φίλος παῖς
σύνθετο θυμῷ
(45): vertical traces, with some rounding at the base
βουλήν, ἥ ῥα θεοῖσιν ἐφήνδανε
μητιόωσι· (45)[10]
(46): slightly rounded vertical stroke
στῆ δὲ παρ’ Ἕκτορ’ ἰὼν καί μιν
πρὸς μῦθον ἔειπεν·
(48): possibly left side of H
ἦῥά νύ
μοί τι πίθοιο, κασίγνητος δέ τοί εἰμι·
(49): unclear, but consistent with A or D
ἄλλους μὲν κάθισον Τρῶας καὶ
πάντας Ἀχαιούς,
(51): possibly A or D
ἀντίβιον
μαχέσασθαι ἐν αἰνῇ δηϊοτῆτι·
(54): like the start of a large E
Ὣς ἔφαθ’, Ἕκτωρ δ’ αὖτε χάρη μέγα
μῦθον ἀκούσας,
(55): vertical stroke
καί ῥ’
ἐς μέσσον ἰὼν Τρώων ἀνέεργε φάλαγγας, (55)[20]
(58): vertical stroke
κὰδ δ’
ἄρ’ Ἀθηναίη τε καὶ ἀργυρότοξος Ἀπόλλων
(60): sharply rounded
φηγῷ
ἐφ’ ὑψηλῇ πατρὸς Διὸς αἰγιόχοιο (60)[25]
(64) opposite 30/32: strange configuration, like a Q or perhaps E
ὀρνυμένοιο νέον, μελάνει δέ τε
πόντος ὑπ’ αὐτῆς,
(67): vertical with loop to the left at lower end (like I or R or
K?)
κέκλυτέ μευ Τρῶες καὶ ἐϋκνήμιδες
Ἀχαιοὶ
(68): rounded, like E S W
ὄφρ’
εἴπω τά με θυμὸς ἐνὶ στήθεσσι κελεύει.
after 35(69): some ink marks but to the left of
the vertical alignment, and horizontally lower than the last line of
the first column
PPennMuseum E02816
(POxy 782) [AT, with RAK]
Homer,
Odyssey 17.137-148, 182-193
(codex,
3 ce); 7.3 cm high x 5.3 cm wide
A small, nearly square fragment from the bottom of the page of a codex,
written stichometrically. The left, right, and top margins have been
lost on side one, but part of a lower margin of about 2.0 cm remains.
The piece is
compromised by multiple holes and tears in the papyrus. The first side,
written against the fibers [||], contains the middle parts of 11 partly
legible lines;
the other side,
written with the fibers [--], has portions of the ends of 12 lines in
the same hand. Assuming the normal text of Homer, the lost
portion between the preserved materials would have contained 33 lines,
resulting in about 45 lines per column on the original page (thus
about 19-20 cm tall, plus margins). Judging
from the relative placement of text on each side of the page, the
"print block" would have been about 10 cm wide, but the right
margins would have contained considerable blank space, especially where
shorter lines appeared. Thus we can estimate an approximate page size
of 24 cm tall and 12-14 cm wide, similar to Turner's "group 8" (half as
wide as high). It is unlikely that the original codex began at the
start of
Odyssey 17, since
this surviving page would have begun at approximately line 104,
requiring more than a double sided leaf of 90 lines for what preceded,
but much less than another full column of 45 lines (or another full
double sided leaf).
The writing is in black ink, in a loose literary hand that slants
slightly to the right ("rather small sloping oval uncials" dated 3rd ce
by G-H), with characters
that average about 0.3 cm tall. The middle stroke of the nu connects
rouighly in the middle of the right vertical stroke. Lambdas tilt left
so that the bottom of the curved right diagonal stroke is noticeably
higher
than the bottom of the left stroke. The left side of the epsilon is
noticeably flattened. Grenfell and Hunt note that accents
and stops are written in lighter ink, but they are now almost entirely
faded and invisible; probably line 142 has a double dot (trema or a
breathing
mark?) over the iota, while in line 183 the U of UFORBOS is similarly
marked and
there is what appears to be a grave accent mark over the first omicron
of that word; a mid-line stop is still visible at the end of line 189.
In the bottome margin of side one is the notation "F 27.12," in light
brown ink, presumably to mark the find location in the dump. In the
lower right margin of side two is the inventory number 782 in red ink.
Textually, the fragment varies from the standard TLG text only in line
187, where the known variant GENESQAI is found rather than LIPESQAI.
πάντες κ’ ὠκύμοροί τε γενοίατο
πικρόγαμοί τε.
ταῦτα δ’ ἅ μ’ εἰρωτ]ᾷς καὶ [λίσσεαι, οὐκ ἂν ἐγώ γε
ἄλλα παρὲξ ε]ἴποιμι
παρ[α]κλι[δὸν
οὐδ’ ἀπατήσω·
ἀλλὰ τὰ μέν ]μ[ο]ι ἔειπε γέρων ἅλ[ιος
νημερτής, (140)
τῶν οὐδέν τοι] ἐγὼ κρύψω ἔπ[ο]ς οὐ[δ’ ἐπικεύσω.
φῆ μιν ὅ γ’ ἐν ν]ή[σ]ῳ ἰδέειν κρατ[έρ’
ἄλγε’ ἔχοντα,
νύμφης ἐ]ν
μεγάροισι Καλυψοῦ[ς, ἥ μιν ἀνάγκῃ
ἴσχει· ὁ δ’ ο]ὐ δύναται ἣν πατρίδ[α γαῖαν ἱκέσθαι·
οὐ γάρ οἱ ]πάρα
νῆες ἐπήρετμο[ι καὶ ἑταῖροι, (145)
οἵ κέν μι]ν πέμποιεν
ἐπ’ εὐρέα [νῶτα θαλάσσης.’
ὣς ἔφατ’ Ἀ]τρεΐδης,
δουρικλειτ[ὸς Μενέλαος.
ταῦτα τελ]ευτήσας
νεόμην· ἔδ[οσαν δέ μοι οὖρον
[lines 149-181 are missing from the top of this column]
δαῖτ’ ἐντυνόμενοι. τοὶ δ’ ἐξ
ἀγροῖο πόλι]νδε
ὠτρύνοντ’ Ὀδυσεύς τ’ ἰέναι ]κα[ὶ
δῖ]ος ὑφορβό[ς.
τοῖσι δὲ μύθων ἦρχε συβώτ]ης ὄρχαμος ἀνδρῶν[·
“ξεῖν’, ἐπεὶ ἂρ δὴ ἔπειτα πόλιν]δ’
ἴμεναι μενεαίν[εις (185)
σήμερον, ὡς ἐπέτελλεν ἄνα]ξ ἐμός· —ἦ σ’ ἂν ἐγώ
γ[ε
αὐτοῦ βουλοίμην σταθμῶν ]ῥυτῆρα λιπέσθαι·
ἀλλὰ τὸν αἰδέομαι καὶ δείδι]α, μή μοι ὀπίσσω
νεικείῃ· χαλεπαὶ δέ τ’ ἀνάκ]των εἰσὶν ὁμοκλαί·—
ἀλλ’ ἄγε νῦν ἴομεν· δὴ γὰρ μέ]μβλωκε μάλιστα (190)
ἦμαρ, ἀτὰρ τάχα τοι ποτὶ ἕσπ]ερα ῥίγιον ἔσται.”
τὸν δ’ ἀπαμειβόμενος
προσέ]φη πολύμητις Ὀδυσσεύ[ς·
“γινώσκω, φρονέω· τά γε δὴ ν]οέοντι
κελεύεις.
Line Notes:
- 137: A spot of ink is visible above the A of the KAI in 138
- 139: The papyrus seems to read EIPOME not EIPOMI
- 142: Two dots appear above the first iota of IDEEIN, and it is
not clear what preceded, where the papyrus is damaged. Two dots also
appear before this iota, though the first of this pair might be the end
of a stroke.
- 149-181 are not preserved
- 185: The papyrus appears to have D IMENAI. Van Thiel notes that
his manuscripts FPHMBDW instead have IENAI.
- 187: ΓΕΝΕΣΘΑΙ
not ΛΙΠΕΣΘΑΙ appears on the papyrus. This reading also appears in van
Thiel's FMBCDW manuscripts.
- 189: A midpoint dot appears at the end of the line, in a lighter
ink.
PPennMuseum E02817
(POxy 776) [AT, with RAK]
Homer,
Odyssey 4.520-529 (roll, 1/2
ce);
blank ||; 6.25 cm high x 2.5 cm wide.
This small, rectangular fragment has lost its upper, left, and right
margins; about 0.5 cm of the lower margin still remains. The text is
written in stichoi along the fibers [--] with parts of 10 lines
preserved from near the starts of the lines. The other side [||] is
blank except for the archaeologist's note "M B.02" (or perhaps "M
3.62") written perpendicularly in a faint brownish ink. The bottom
right margin of the first side has the inventory number 776 in red.
Thus this is probably part of a column from a roll, written in
black ink in a regular literary block hand ("round uncials" of the
"first or early second century" G-H), with characters about 0.25
cm tall. Diacriticals and accents in the same color ink are well
preserved in lines 522
(acute accent) and both 524 and 528 (apostrophe shaped elision marks),
while in 529 there seems to be an acute mark over the final A, but
nothing over the D. In line 525, there is a dot-like mark between
the G and the I, like a midpoint.
Characteristic
features of letters include a two-stroke rounded epsilon (also three
stroke), an almost
Roman alpha (nearly horizontal mid stroke), kappa with a low upper
diagonal, and a mu with very deep "U-shaped" middle stroke. Omicrons
and sigmas
are two stroke, thetas are three. Eta has a very high middle stroke.
ἂψ δ]ὲ θεο[ὶ
οὖρον στρέψαν, καὶ οἴκαδ’ ἵκοντο, (520)
ἦ ]τοι ὁ μὲ[ν
χαίρων ἐπεβήσετο πατρίδος αἴης,
κ]αὶ κύνε[ι
ἁπτόμενος ἣν πατρίδα· πολλὰ δ’ ἀπ’ αὐτοῦ
δά]κρυα θε[ρμὰ
χέοντ’, ἐπεὶ ἀσπασίως ἴδε γαῖαν.
τὸ]ν δ’ ἄρ’ἀπ[ὸ
σκοπιῆς εἶδε σκοπός, ὅν ῥα καθεῖσεν
Αἴ]γισθος δ[ολόμητις
ἄγων, ὑπὸ δ’ ἔσχετο μισθὸν (525)
χρ]υσοῦ δο[ιὰ
τάλαντα· φύλασσε δ’ ὅ γ’ εἰς ἐνιαυτόν,
μή] ἑ λάθοι[
παριών, μνήσαιτο δὲ θούριδος ἀλκῆς.
βῆ] δ’ ἴμεν ἀ[γγελέων
πρὸς δώματα ποιμένι λαῶν.
αὐ]τίκα δ’
Α[ἴγισθος δολίην ἐφράσσατο τέχνην·
Line Notes:
PPennMuseum E02818
(POxy 778)
Homer,
Odyssey 10.26-50 (roll, 2/3 ce)
[on display, 3rd floor]; reused on || for a letter (3 ce); 20.6 cm.
high x 17.2 cm wide.
"A nearly complete column ... with stops
(high, middle and low point). ... Late second or third century, written
in handsome round upright uncials. On the verso parts of the last 7
lines of a letter in a cursive hand of the late third century" (G-H).
ὄφρα φέ]ροι νῆ[άς
τε καὶ ]αὐτούς· οὐδ’ ἄρ’ ἔμ[ελλεν
ἐκτελέ]ειν·
αὐτῶν[ γὰρ ἀ]πωλόμεθ’ ἀφραδίῃσιν[.
ἐννῆ]μαρ μὲν ὁμῶ[ς πλ]έομεν νύκτας
τε καὶ[ ἦμαρ,
τῇ δ]εκάτῃ δ’
ἤδη ἀ[νεφαί]νεφαί,[
]καὶ δὴ
πυρπολέον[τας ]ἐλεύσσομεν ἐγγὺς ἐό[ντας.
(30)
]ἔνθ’ ἐμὲ μὲν
γλυκ[ὺς ὕπ]νος ἐπέλλαβε κεκμ[ηῶτα·
]αἰεὶ γὰρ
πόδα νηὸ[ς ἐ]νώμων, οὐδέ τῳ ἄλλῳ[
δῶχ’ ἑτάρων,
ἵνα θᾶ[σσ]ον ἱκοίμεθα πατρίδα
{}[γαῖαν·
οἱ δ’ ἕταροι
ἐπέεσσι[ πρὸς ]ἀλλήλους
ἀγόρευο[ν
καί μ’ ἔφασαν
χρυσόν[ τε ]καὶ ἄργυρον οἴκα [δ’ ἄγεσθαι, (35)
δῶρα παρ’ Αἰόλοο
μ[εγαλήτ]ορος Ἱπποτάδαο.
ὧδε δέ τις
εἴπεσκεν ἰδ[ὼν ]ἐς πλησίον ἄλλον[·
‘ὢ πόποι, ὡς ὅδε πᾶσ[ι
φίλο]ς καὶ τίμιός ἐστιν{}
ἀνθρώποισ’,
ὅτεών[ κε πόλ]ιν καὶ γαῖαν ἵκηται.
πολλὰ μὲν ἐκ
Τροί[ης ἄγε[ται κειμήλια καλὰ (40)
ληΐ]δος· ἡμεῖς
δ’ αὖτ[ε ὁ]μὴν ὁδὸν ἐκτελέσαντ[ες
οἴκαδε
ν{}ισόμεθ[α κ]ενεὰς σὺν χεῖρας ἔχον[τες.
καὶ νῦν οἱ τά
γε δῶκε χαριζόμενος φιλότ[ητι
Αἴολος. ἀλλ’
ἄγε θᾶσσον ἰδώμεθα, ὅττι τάδ’ ἐστί[ν,
ὅσσος τις
χρυσός τε καὶ ἄργυρος ἀσκῷ{} ἔνεστι[ν.’ (45)
ὣς
ἔφασαν, βουλὴ δ{}ὲ κακὴ νίκησεν ἑταίρων·[
ἀσκὸν μὲν
λῦσαν, ἄνεμοι δ’ ἐκ πάντες ὄρουσαν,[
τοὺς δ’ αἶψ’
ἁρπάξασα φέρεν πόντονδε θύελλα
κλαίοντας,
γαίης ἄπο πατρίδος. αὐτὰρ ἐγώ γε
ἐγρόμενος
κατὰ θυμὸν ἀμύμονα μερμήριξα, (50)
PPennMuseum E02819
(POxy 781) [AT, with RAK]
Homer, Odyssey
16.243-256, 288-301 (codex, 3 ce) 6.2 cm high x 3.5 cm wide
No margins are preserved in this fragment from a codex page, which is
damaged by vertical creases and tears about every cm across, perhaps
from crushing or folding. The first side, written with the fibers [--]
has parts of 14 lines and the other side preserves parts of the ends of
14 lines, in a stichometric format resembling PPennMuseum E02816 (POxy
782), described above. The original page probably contained about 45
lines and thus would have been about 20 cm tall (plus upper and lower
margins), and perhaps 12 cm wide (Turner's group 8).
Both sides are in black ink, in a
regular, if slightly sloppy (and/or hasty), right-slanting uncial
("rather small sloping oval uncials" dated to 3rd ce G-H), with
characters about 0.25 cm tall. Notable letter forms include epsilon
with a middle stroke that extends farther right than the upper and
lower strokes and a very flat left side, nu with the diagonal
connecting at the base of the right vertical, small omegas raised above
the base line, and alphas sometimes tipped to the left so that the
right foot ends about at mid line height. Some diacritical marks
(dieresis over the iotas at the start of names in lines 244 and 251,
and over the upsilon in line 292, perhaps indicating rough breathing)
and punctuation (end of lines 290, 298, 299.300) have been supplied,
perhaps by a later hand, in a light, reddish ink, now very faded.
Occasional ligatures occur, and there is no obvious specing between
words or phrases. The modern finder's marks "F.27.26" (in dark brown
ink) and "781" (in red) appear in the right margin of side two.
The only divergences from the standard (TLG) text appear in lines 292,
UMEIN (a common itacism), and 293 DE not TE (again, a common
variation).
ἀλλὰ λίην μέγα εἶπ]ες· ἄγη [μ’ ἔχει· οὐδέ κεν εἴη
ἄνδρε δύ]ω
πολλοῖσι καὶ ἰ[φθίμοισι μάχεσθαι.
μνηστήρ]ων δ’
οὔτ’ ἂρ δεκ[ὰς ἀτρεκὲς οὔτε δύ’ οἶαι, (245)
ἀλλὰ πολ]ὺ πλέονες·
τάχα δ’ [εἴσεαι ἐνθάδ’ ἀριθμόν.
ἐκ μὲν Δο]υλιχίοιο
δύω κα[ὶ πεντήκοντα
κοῦροι κε]κριμένοι,
ἓξ δὲ δ[ρηστῆρες ἕπονται·
ἐκ δὲ Σάμ]ης
πίσυρες τε κα[ὶ εἴκοσι φῶτες ἔασιν,
ἐκ δὲ Ζα]κύνθου
ἔασιν ἐεί[κοσι κοῦροι Ἀχαιῶν, (250)
ἐκ δ’ αὐτῆς] Ἰθάκης
δυοκαί[δεκα πάντες ἄριστοι,
καί σφιν ἅ]μ’ ἐστὶ
Μέδων κῆ[ρυξ καὶ θεῖος ἀοιδὸς
καὶ δοιὼ θε]ράποντε,
δαήμο[νε δαιτροσυνάων.
τῶν εἴ κεν] πάντων
ἀντ[ήσομεν ἔνδον ἐόντων,
μὴ πολύπικρ]α καὶ
αἰνὰ [βίας ἀποτείσεαι ἐλθών. (255)
ἀλλὰ σύ γ’, εἰ δύν]ασαί τιν’ [ἀμύντορα μερμηρίξαι,
. . . . [missing c 31 lines] . .
. .
‘ἐκ καπνοῦ κατέθηκ’, ἐπεὶ οὐκέτι τοῖσιν ἐῴκει,
οἷά ποτε Τροίηνδε κιὼν κατέλειπε]ν Ὀδυσσεύς,
ἀλλὰ κατῄκισται, ὅσσον πυρὸς
ἵκετ’ ἀ]ϋτμή. (290)
πρὸς δ’ ἔτι καὶ τόδε μεῖζον ἐνὶ
φρεσὶ] θῆκε Κρονίων,
μή πως οἰνωθέντες, ἔριν στήσαντ]ες ἐν ὑμῖν,
ἀλλήλους τρώσητε καταισχύνητ]έ τε δαῖτα
καὶ μνηστύν· αὐτὸς γὰρ ἐφέλκεται]
ἄνδρα σίδηρος.’
νῶϊν δ’ οἴοισιν δύο φάσγανα καὶ
δύ]ο δοῦρε (295)
καλλιπέειν καὶ δοιὰ βοάγρια χερσὶ]ν ἑλέσθαι,
ὡς ἂν ἐπιθύσαντες ἑλοίμεθα· τοὺ]ς
δέ κ’ ἔπειτα
Παλλὰς Ἀθηναίη θέλξει καὶ μη]τίετα Ζεύς.
ἄλλο δέ τοι ἐρέω, σὺ δ’ ἐνὶ φρεσὶ
βάλλεο] σῇσιν·
εἰ ἐτεόν γ’ ἐμός ἐσσι καὶ αἵματος
ἡμε]τέροιο, (300)
μή τις ἔπειτ’ Ὀδυσῆος ἀκουσάτω
ἔν]δον ἐόντ[ος·
Line Notes:
- 244: Dieresis on final iota.
- 246: Ink remains at the edge of the papyrus before the clear Π. A
small tail of a triangular letter exists below the Α at the right edge.
- 251: Dieresis on final iota
- 288: Lower part of two letters, the first possible A or D, the
second slightly rounded to the right.
- 292: Dieresis over the U in UMEIN
- 293: DE not TE. DE appears in van Thiel's PHCDUW manuscripts as
well.
PPennMuseum E02821
(POxy 775) [AT, with RAK]
Homer, Odyssey Od
4.388-400 (roll, 3 ce); blank ||; 8.2 cm high x 4.5 cm wide
This rectangular fragment of a roll on
light-colored papyrus contains some tears and shredding. The middle
portion of 12 lines written along the fibers [--] is preserved, plus
about 1.5 cm of the lower margin. There is no way to tell how tall the
column might have been, but it was probably about 11-12 cm wide. The
other side of the fragment [||] is entirely blank.
The characters are about 0.3 cm tall in
regular, slightly right-leaning oval uncials dated to the 3rd ce (G-H)
without any obvious spacing between words. Diacritical marks include an
apostrophe after the tau in line 392, a rough breathing on the initial
omicron in line 393, and an acute accent over the final epsilon in line
396. Also in 396, a later hand has corrected eta to alpha on the final
word, striking a diagonal line through the eta and inserting the alpha
above it.Notable paleographic features include very thin thetas with a
low and wide mid stroke; lower verticals on rho, tau, upsilon, and phi,
that extend well below the line and also curve slightly to the left;
and small omicrons raised above the base line. The lower right foot of
the kappas is also almost parallel to the base line.
Textually, line 399 (bracketed in the TLG text) is not present, and
there is a correction in line 396, as mentioned -- HLEH[TAI to ALEH[TAI.
τόν γ’ εἴ πως σὺ δύναιο
λοχησάμενος] λελα[βέσθαι,
ὅς κέν τοι εἴπῃσιν ὁδ]ὸν καὶ μέτρα κελε[ύθου
νόστον θ’, ὡς ἐπὶ πόντ]ον ἐλεύσεαι ἰχθυό[εντα. (390)
καὶ δέ κέ τοι εἴπῃσι, δι]οτρεφές, αἴ κ’ ἐθέ[λῃσθα,
ὅττι τοι ἐν μεγάροισι] κακόν τ’ ἀγαθόν [τε τέτυκται
οἰχομένοιο σέθεν δολ]ιχὴν ὁδὸν ἀργαλ[έην τε.
ὣς ἔφατ’, αὐτὰρ ἐγώ μι]ν ἀμειβόμενος [προσέειπον·
αὐτὴ νῦν φράζευ σὺ λό]χον θείοιο γέρον[τος, (395)
μή πώς με προϊδὼν] ἠὲ προδαεὶς ἀλέη[ται·
ἀργαλέος γάρ τ’ ἐστὶ θεὸς] βροτῷ ἀνδρὶ [δαμῆναι.
ὣς ἐφάμην, ἡ δ’ αὐτίκ’ ἀ]μείβετο δῖα θεά[ων·
[τοιγὰρ ἐγώ τοι ταῦτα μάλ’ ἀτρεκέως ἀγορεύσω.]
ἦμος δ’ ἠέλιος μέσον οὐρα]νὸν ἀμφιβεβή[κῃ, (400)
Line Notes:
- 392: Apostrophe after and above the T.
- 393: A rough breathing has been inserted over the O of ODON.
- 396: HLEH[TAI is corrected ALEH[TAI, and an accurate accent
appears over the E.
- 399: Lacking
PPennMuseum E03076
(POxy 948) [AT, with RAK]
Homer, Iliad
10.233-243, 250-255 (roll, 3 ce), blank ||; two fragments, the largest
of which is 9 cm high x 4.2 cm wide, and the other 6.7 x 2.2 cm
Both of these pieces are from the end of a column and the smaller
fragment preserves a lower margin of 1.5 cm; thus by including the six
lost intervening lines, the column would have been at least 21 cm tall,
plus whatever may have been above the larger fragment (including an
upper margin of perhaps 2 cm.). The first fragment contains the ends of
11 lines, and the smaller fragment has the ends of 6 more lines. The
original column thus had at least 23 lines. The text is written along
the fibers [--] in black ink using relatively thin strokes. The back
[||] is completely blank, thus indicating that the fragments probably
came from a roll.
The hand is rather hasty and careless, with frequent ligatures.
"Third century, written in a good-sized semi-uncial hand," "with stops
(middle and low points) and occasional breathings, accents, and marks
of quantity" (G-H). [etc]
τοῖσι δὲ καὶ μετέειπεν ἄναξ
ἀνδρ]ῶν Ἀγαμέ[μνων·
Τυδεΐδη Διόμηδες ἐμῷ κεχαρισμ]ένε θυμ[ῷ
τὸν μὲν δὴ ἕταρόν γ’ αἱρήσεαι ὅν
κ’ ἐθ]έλῃσθα, (235)
φαινομένων τὸν ἄριστον, ἐπεὶ] μεμάασί γε πολλο[ί.
μηδὲ σύ γ’ αἰδόμενος σῇσι φρεσὶ] τὸν μὲν ἀρείω
καλλείπειν, σὺ δὲ χείρον’ ὀπάσσ]εαι αἰδοῖ εἴκων
ἐς γενεὴν ὁρόων, μηδ’ εἰ βασιλ]εύτερός ἐστιν.
{2—>}2 Ὣς ἔφατ’, ἔδεισεν δὲ περὶ ξανθῷ
Με]νε[λ]άῳ. (240)
τοῖς δ’ αὖτις μετέειπε βοὴν
ἀγαθὸς Διο]μήδης·
{2>}2εἰ μὲν δὴ ἕταρόν γε κελεύετέ μ’ αὐτὸν ἑ]λέσθαι,
πῶς ἂν ἔπειτ’ Ὀδυσῆος ἐγὼ θείοιο
λα]θοίμην[,
οὗ πέρι μὲν πρόφρων κραδίη καὶ
θυμὸς ἀγήνωρ
ἐν πάντεσσι πόνοισι, φιλεῖ δέ ἑ
Παλλὰς Ἀθήνη. (245)
τούτου γ’ ἑσπομένοιο καὶ ἐκ πυρὸς
αἰθομένοιο
ἄμφω νοστήσαιμεν, ἐπεὶ περίοιδε
νοῆσαι.
Τὸν δ’ αὖτε προσέειπε
πολύτλας δῖος Ὀδυσσεύς·
Τυδεΐδη μήτ’ ἄρ με μάλ’ αἴνεε
μήτέ τι νείκει·
εἰδόσι γάρ τοι ταῦτα μετ’
Ἀργείοις ἀγορ]εύεις. (250)
ἀλλ’ ἴομεν· μάλα γὰρ νὺξ ἄνεται,
ἐγγύθι δ’] ἠώς,
{2>}2 ἄστρα δὲ δὴ προβέβηκε, παροίχωκεν δ]ὲ πλέων ν[ὺξ
{2—}2 τῶν δύο μοιράων, τριτάτη δ’ ἔτι μοῖρα λ]έλειπται.
Ὣς εἰπόνθ’ ὅπλοισιν
ἔνι δεινοῖσιν ἐ]δύτην.
Τυδεΐδῃ μὲν δῶκε μενεπτόλεμος] Θρασυμή[δης (255)
Line Notes:
- 233: Bottoms of several letters are visible.
- 234: Probably iota adscript at the end (as seen on a partly
displaced piece)
- 240: Iota adscript at the end
- 243: Tops of several letters are visible
- 244-249: Missing section
- 251: ΠΛΕΩΝ is the generall accepted reading, though it goes
against much of the manuscript tradition.
- 253: Where LIPTAI was written, another E has been inserted above
the LI.This line is omitted by Zenodotus Ephesius, but it is marked
authentic by Aristarchus Samothrax and Aristophanes Byzantius.
PPennMuseum E16586
Homer, Iliad 12.125-132, 156-163 (codex; date?);
6.8 cm high x 5.0 cm wide.
Parts of 8 lines, no margins, blurred brown ink. "Graeco-Roman Era."
About 23 lines are missing between columns; thus originally there would
have been about 31-32 lines per column.
ὀξέα κεκλήγοντες· ]ἔφαντο γὰρ ο[ὐκ ἔτ’ Ἀχαιοὺς (125)
σχήσεσθ’, ἀλ]λ’ ἐν νηυσὶ μελ[αίνῃσιν
πεσέεσθαι
νήπιοι, ἐν δ]ὲ πύλῃσι δύ’ ἀ[νέρας εὗρον
ἀρίστους
υἷας ὑπερ]θύμους
Λα[πιθάων αἰχμητάων,
τὸν μὲν Π]ειριθόου
υἷ[α κρατερὸν Πολυποίτην,
τὸν δὲ Λεον]τῆα
βροτο[λοιγῷ ἶσον Ἄρηϊ. (130)
τὼ μὲν ἄρα] προπάρο[ιθε
πυλάων ὑψηλάων
ἕστασαν ὡς ὅτ]ε
τε [δρύες οὔρεσιν ὑψικάρηνοι,
. . . . [about 23 lines missing]
. . . .
νηῶν τ’ ὠκυπόρων· ν]ιφάδες [δ’ ὡς πῖπτον ἔραζε,
ἅς τ’ ἄνεμος ζαὴς νέ]φεα σκιόεν[τα δονήσας
ταρφειὰς κατέχευεν] ἐπὶ χθονὶ
π[ουλυβοτείρῃ·
ὣς τῶν ἐκ χειρῶν βέλεα ῥ]έον ἠμὲν Ἀ[χαιῶν
ἠδὲ καὶ ἐκ Τρώων· κόρυ]θες δ’ ἀμφ’ αὖον
[ἀΰτευν (160)
βαλλομένων μυλάκεσσι κ]αὶ ἀσπίδες ὀ[μφαλόεσσαι.
δή ῥα τότ’ ᾤμωξεν καὶ] ὣ πεπλήγετ[ο μηρὼ
Ἄσιος Ὑρτακίδης, καὶ ἀ]λαστ[ήσας
ἔπος ηὔδα·
Line Notes:
- 125: Very faded, but seems to have QIAKARO or the like ; TESEF
earlier in the line is possible, but far from convincing.
- 128: This papyrus counters the reading of ὑπερθύμω by both
Zenodotus Ephesius and Aristophanes Byzantius. This reading is also
supported by P.Morgan (West #60), from the 4th cent., and P.Mich. inv.
5574 (=West #620), from the 3rd cent., and West's Ω.
- 132: Since only a small fragment of the line remains, this
papyrus does not aid in deciding between the various readings for this
line.
- 133-155: Not preserved.
- 159: ΕΟΝ supports the reading of Aristarchus and other sources,
including Ω.
PPennMuseum E16697.32
Homer, Iliad 11.425-437, traces of
something else on -- (reused; date?)
12 lines, light yellow surface, neat hand
νύξεν· ὃ] δ’ ἐν
[κονίῃσι πεσὼν ἕλε γαῖαν ἀγοστῷ. (425)
τοὺς μὲ]ν
ἔασ’, ὃ δ’ [ἄρ’ Ἱππασίδην Χάροπ’ οὔτασε δουρὶ
αὐτοκα]σίγνητον
[εὐηφενέος Σώκοιο.
τῷ δ’ ἐ]παλεξήσ[ων
Σῶκος κίεν ἰσόθεος φώς,
στῆ δὲ] μάλ’
ἐγγὺ[ς ἰὼν καί μιν πρὸς μῦθον ἔειπεν
"ὦ Ὀδυ]σεῦ
πολύα[ινε δόλων
ἆτ’ ἠδὲ πόνοιο (430)
σήμερ]ον
[ἢ δο]ιοῖ[σιν ἐπεύξεαι Ἱππασίδῃσι
τοιώ]δ’ ἄν[δρε]
κα[τακτείνας καὶ τεύχε’ ἀπούρας,
ἤ κεν] ἐμῷ
[ὑπὸ δουρὶ τυπεὶς ἀπὸ θυμὸν ὀλέσσῃς."
Ὣς εἰ]πὼ[ν οὔτησε κατ’ ἀσπίδα πάντοσ’ ἐΐσην.
διὰ μ]ὲν
ἀ[σπίδος ἦλθε φαεινῆς ὄβριμον ἔγχος, (435)
καὶ δι]ὰ θώ[ρηκος
πολυδαιδάλου ἠρήρειστο,
πάντα] δ’ ἀ[πὸ πλευρῶν χρόα
ἔργαθεν, οὐδ’ ἔτ’ ἔασε
Line Notes
PPennLibrary 001
Homer, Odyssey Od
4.803-817; traces of different hand on -- (reused; date?)
On the other side, written along the fibers [--], are traces of several
lines, perhaps in two different hands (the writing is partly hidden
behind a translucent "Japanese paper" backing attached around the
edges): 4-6 lines in what may have been a neat uncial, lightly written,
then two lines in a documentary cursive, more heavily written
(...LENON, ...KAIT), perhaps dating to 1-3rd CE.
στῆ δ’ ἄρ’ ὑπὲρ κεφαλῆς καί μιν
πρὸς μῦθον ἔειπεν·
“εὕδεις, Πηνελόπεια, φίλον τετιημέ]ν[η ἦτορ;
οὐ μέν σ’ οὐδὲ ἐῶσι θεοὶ ῥεῖα
ζώοντες [ (805)
κλαίειν οὐδ’ ἀκάχησθαι, ἐπεί ῥ’
ἔτι ν]όστ[ι]μός ἐσ[τι
σὸς πάϊς· οὐ μὲν γάρ τι θεοῖσ’
ἀλιτήμ]ενός ἐστι.”
τὴν δ’ ἠμείβετ’
ἔπειτα περίφ]ρων Πηνελ[όπεια,
ἡδὺ μάλα κνώσσουσ’ ἐν ὀνειρε]ίῃσι πύλῃ[σιν·
“τίπτε, κασιγνήτη, δεῦρ’ ἤλυθ]ες;
οὔ τι πάρο[ς γε (810)
πωλέ’, ἐπεὶ μάλα πολλὸν ἀπόπρ]οθι δώματα ν[αίεις·
καί με κέλεαι παύσασθαι ὀϊζύος] ἠδ’ ὀδυνάων
πολλέων, αἵ μ’ ἐρέθουσι κατὰ φρ]ένα καὶ κατ[ὰ θυμόν·
ἣ πρὶν μὲν πόσιν ἐσθλὸν ἀπώλ]εσα θυμο[λέοντα,
παντοίῃσ’ ἀρετῇσι κεκασμένο]ν ἐν Δαναοῖσιν, (815)
ἐσθλόν, τοῦ κλέος εὐρὺ καθ’] Ἑλλάδα κ[αὶ μέσον Ἄργος.
νῦν αὖ παῖς ἀγαπητὸς ἔβη κοίλ]ης ἐπὶ ν[ηός,
Line Notes:
- 803: The trace of the bottom of a vertical stroke, plus part of a
rounded one.
- 804: Bold N
- 805: Blank because of short line.
- 806: Traces of broken letters, possibly OST, then a hole before
the right side of M.
- 810: Exceptionally large first O preceded by a hint of spacing.
- 812: Apostrophe over the first D
Appendix: From Ferrini's eBay sales -- Iliad
23.882-888 [RAK]
In November of 2005, when the
papyrus collection from Bruce P. Ferrini's bookstore in Akron Ohio was
being disposed of piece by piece on eBay, I made contact with an
earlier eBay buyer, Alexander
Mihaylovich of Los Angeles, who had successfully bid on a group of eleven
miscellaneous small fragments (17 Nov 2005, item
#7365384513) among which I was able to identify, through
the eBay image, a scrap of Homer's Iliad. Since
the new owner has given me permission to publish the fragment
(which can be seen on my web page
-- including the undeciphered
other side ), I decided to include it here as well. Its original provenance is unknown.
The
text has been written in stichoi, against the fibers [||], which
suggests that it may have been placed on reused papyrus, perhaps as an
excerpt or/and a "school exercise" (classical Greek scroll texts such
as Homer were normally written along the fibers). No image of the other
side was provided by the seller, but the purchaser confirms that there
is a single line of writing on the other side, although I have thus far
been unable to make sense of it from the image he supplied (perhaps it
is Demotic?). In the original eBay image, the top two lines were folded
over on the right, concealing any letters in that section. The owner
has flattened that area and supplied the above image confirming that
the expected letters are present.
The hand seems consistent with a
first or second century CE date, although this bears further
exploration. There
are no deviations from the expected text as available on the TLG site.
ἂν δ’ ἄρα
Μηριόνης
πελέκεας δέκα πάντας ἄει]ρ[ε,
Τεῦκρος δ’ ἡμιπέλεκκα φέρεν κοίλας ἐπὶ ν]ῆας.
Αὐτὰρ Πηλεΐδης κατὰ μὲν δολιχόσκιον ἔγχο]ς,
κὰδ δὲ λέβητ’ ἄπυρον βοὸς ἄξιον ἀνθεμόε]ντα (885)
θῆκ’ ἐς ἀγῶνα φέρων· καί ῥ’ ἥμονες ἄνδρ]ες ἀνέστ[αν·
ἂν μὲν ἄρ’ Ἀτρεΐδης εὐρὺ κρείων Ἀγαμέμ]νων,
ἂν δ’ ἄρα Μηριόνης, θεράπων ἐῢς Ἰδομ]ενῆος.
τοῖσι δὲ καὶ μετέειπε ποδάρκης δῖος
Ἀχιλλεύς·
//created 07 April 2009, updated 01 May 2009, RAK (to
be continued)//