INTRODUCTION
These essays
span about a third of a century and focus on interfaces between Jewish
materials and the worlds in which they were transmitted and/or perceived,
especially Christian contexts. The lead essay, which was first delivered to the
1976 SNTS congress at Duke University, spent most of its early life as an
electronic publication (on Ioudaios from 1990,
updated version on http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/rs/rak/publics/pseudepig/pseudepold)
before Bill Adler and John Reeves rescued it for hardcopy appearance.1
Some of my colleagues jokingly spoke of it as one of the most cited
non-publications (conventionally speaking, of course) of which they were aware.
In any event, it became a conventionally published essay in 1994 with filled
out and updated footnotes by John Reeves, which led to further reflection and
updating in a presentation I gave at the Tel Aviv Conference of the Studiorum Novi Testamenti Societas (SNTS) in 2000.2 For the present
purposes, I’ve attempted to supply cross references and cut down on any overt overlaps
between those two initial essays in hopes that they will illustrate some
progress more than mere repetition. They are, in many ways, the heart and
backbone of this collection. For the title, I’ve adopted the term “scripturesque” to cover all those materials and traditions,
whether they later became canonical or not, that seem to have been respected [[viii]]
as “scriptural” by some individuals or communities in the period prior to (or
apart from) the development of an exclusivistic
canonical consciousness in some Jewish and Christian circles.
1 Tracing
the Threads: Studies in the Vitality of Jewish Pseudepigrapha
(ed. John C. Reeves; SBLEJL 6;
2 “Setting the Stage and
Framing Some Central Questions,” JSJ
32 (2001) 371–395 (below, Chapter Two).
Also of
a more general nature, providing further conceptual context, are the essays on
the “parting of the ways,” the review of Charlesworth
and
Most of the
other essays gathered here deal with details, whether for those unknown authors
and compilers of the materials here called “pseudepigrapha”
(a category designation that I have come to view as inappropriate and/or
misleading, without yet finding a more satisfactory substitute) or for known
authors such as Philo and Josephus. Some of the sections started out as
electronic publications of a quite unpolished nature (e.g., the concluding
section on the Dialogue of Timothy and
A word is in
order about my desire to update the information in the notes—-and sometimes
also in the text—-with reference to other (especially more recent) relevant
publications and related materials. I began to do this note by note, but soon
realized that at almost every point, it would be appropriate to refer to the
extensive bibliography [[ix]] compiled in print form by Lorenzo DiTommaso3
and also to say something like “pursue these topics through your internet
search engine” (e.g., google.com). The internet is full of additional
information (and sometimes misinformation)—-and especially bibliography—-that
can help the reader to fill out the pictures being presented, and there are
many responsible sites to facilitate the task, such as the online “Research
Guide for Christianity” from the
3 Lorenzo DiTommaso,
A Bibliography of Pseudepigrapha
Research 1850–1999 (JSPSup 39;