�OF14��TW62��LS1.25��SF1,1��PT16��FM1LS=1,FT=0,IP=0,0,SC=1,FL,LA=1,LR=1,RT=2,BF=0��FS1�IP0,0��LS1�
�MDSU�____________�MDNM�
��FW1�IP0,0��LS1�
�MDSU��LD_�_�MDNM�
��SF1,1�                    �MDBO�Introduction�MDNM�

                       �PT14� �MDBO�A.The Textual Witnesses�MDNM�

 	                  I. The Greek Witnesses�FN1�RP�For fuller information on the Greek manuscripts, see Rahlfs, Verzeichnis.�


The Exodus edition is based on the following Mss, which have all been recollated by the LXX-Unternehmen:

 					   1. Uncial manuscripts 

A London, Brit. Mus., Royal 1 D.V. V. Century. "codex Alexandrinus". In H.-P. the ms is III.

B Rome, Bibl. Vat., Vat.gr. 1209. IV.Century. "codex Vaticanus". 1,1-2,6 is very faded, and was later retraced. Variants from this section are designated as B�MDOL�s�MDNM�, if the underwriting can no longer be seen. In H.-P. the ms is II.

F Milan, Bibl. Ambr., S.P. 51 (formerly A. 147 inf.). V. Century. Through loss of a leaf the following text is lacking: 1,1-10 �LA3�����LA1� �LA3� 8,19 ���� �LA1��LA3�1�LA0��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��-12,31 �LA3���� 6�LA1��LA3��LA0��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1�� �LA3� 30,29 ���������-31,18 ����  36,3 ���LA1�]�LA0��LA3���������-37,10 ��� 2�LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA0��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1���LA3�. �LA1�Another leaf was damaged resulting in the absence of 32,6 �LA3����LA1�]�LA0��LA3�󠘤-13 ��������LA1�[�LA3�����. �LA1�The correctors in F come from two clearly distinct periods. The codex was first corrected by various hands which can be recognized by
their yello�LA3�� ��LA1�r brown tints and their majuscule writing; these are called F�MDOL�a�MDNM� in the edition. In medieval times the codex was consistently retraced by a restorer throughout the ms. His and later correctors are called F�MDOL�b�MDNM�, and when their corrections can be distinguished in time as F�MDOL�b1�MDNM� and F�MDOL�b2�MDNM�. When F�MDOL�b�MDNM� has made a clear mistake in retracing text it is called F�MDOL�s�MDNM�. The missing passage in F, 30,29-31,18 was supplied by F�MDOL�b�MDNM�. In connection with the omission of 36,3-37,10 noted above an unusual problem evolved. At 37,10ff the text of F with its usual correctors F�MDOL�a�MDNM� and F�MDOL�b�MDNM� occur. But at the same juncture a later corrector, also a minuscule hand, wanting to provide for the missing text inserted a text which in both order and textual character was much closer to MT than F. This text consisted of 36,3 (in MT) - MT 39,19, though due to page damage it lacks the text of 39,3 �LA3�������LA1� �LA3��LA1��LA3�1�LA0��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��-16 �LA3��������LA1�[�LA3����LA1�. Because of this text's nature some passages occur twice. This later text is designated as F�MDOL�h�MDNM��LA3�. �LA1�Its corrections are dubbed F�MDOL�h2�MDNM� (over against F�MDOL�h1�MDNM� = the original reading of F�MDOL�h�MDNM�). Corrections by erasure which can not be identified are simply called F�MDOL�s�MDNM�. Most marginal readings in the ms are from F�MDOL�b�MDNM�, for which often erasure by dots locates the text effected. These are not noted in the edition. Edition: A.M.Ceriani, Monumenta et profana 3, Milan 1864. In H.-P. = VII.

G Paris, Bibl. Nat., Gr.17. IV.-V. Century. Contents: MT 36,35 �LA3���������LA1�- MT 37,21 �LA3������LA1�  MT 38,24 �LA3�����LA1�]�LA0��LA3�����-�LA1�MT 39,21  MT 39,37 �LA3����-�LA1�MT 39,40 �LA3������ 2�LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA0��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1�� �LA3� �� 39,�LA1�4�LA3�0 ���-�� 3�LA1�9�LA3�,4�LA1�1 �LA3���� 3�LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA0��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1���LA3�  40,3 ��󜠮LA1�]�LA0��LA3��-4 ����� 1�LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA0��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1���LA3�  40,6 �LA1�(�LA3���LA1�)�LA3� �����-8 ����� �LA1�(�LA3����LA1�)�LA3�  40,9 �LA1�(�LA3�...�LA1�]�LA0��LA3����-�LA1�fin libri. Edition: P. de Lagarde, Semitica II. Abh.d.K.Ges. d. Wiss. zu G�outt. 25 (1879). In H.-P. = V.

M Paris, Bibl. Nat., Coisl.1. VII. Century. Hexaplaric Notes. In H.-P. = X.

						2. Minuscule manuscripts

14 Rome, Bibl. Vat., Palat, gr. 203. XI. Century. Through loss of a leaf 40,20 �LA3���� �LA1��LA3�2�LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA0��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1��LA3��LA1���LA3�-�LA1�fin libri.

15 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Coisl.2. X. Century. In Br.-M. = a

16 Florence, Bibl. Laur., Plut. V 38. XI, Century.

18 Florence, Bibl. Laur., Medic. Palat. 242. XI. Century.

19 Rome Bibl. Vat., Chigi R. VI. 38. XII Century. in Br.-M. = b�LA3��LA1�

25 Munich, Bayer. Staatsbibl., Gr.9. XI. Century. Cat.

29 Venice, Bibl. Marc., Gr.2. X.-XI. Century. Cat. In Br.-M. b�MDSD�2�MDNM�.

30 Rome, Bibl.Casanat., 1444. XI.-XII. Century.

44 Zittau, Christian-Weise-Bibl., A.1. XV. Century. In Br.-M. = d.

46 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Coisl. 4. XIII.-XIV. Century. Contents: 1,1-13,9 �LA3��� 1�LA1���LA3�  2�LA1�8�LA3�,19 ������򠦤-�LA1�fin libri. These passages were supplied by a suppletor (XV.-XVI. Century); the suppletion runs to 29,5 �LA3��� 2�LA1�� which text is designated as 46�MDOL�s�MDNM�.

52 Florence, Bibl. Laur., Acq. 44. X.-XI. Century. Cat. Through loss of leaf the ms lacks 19,21 �LA3���������LA1�]�LA0��LA3��-22,3 ��� �LA1�and�LA3� 28,7 ����-31,8 �򘧜����LA1� which were supplied in  XIV. Century. In Br.-M. = e.

53 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Gr.17A. Written in 1439. In Br.-M. = f.

54 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Gr.5. XIII.-XIV. Century. Through leaf loss 19,9 �LA3�����- 21,22 ����LA1�[�LA3������LA1� is absent�LA3�. �LA1�The codex has been asembled from two parts. The first ms ended with 40,13 fin, and the second began with 40,13 �LA3���� 2�LA1���LA3�. �LA1�In Br.-M. = g.

55 Rome, Vat., Bibl., Regin gr.1. First half of X. Century. In Br.-M = h.

56 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Gr.3. Written in 1096. Contains some Catena extracts. In Br.-M. = i.

57 Rome, Bibl.Vat., Vat. gr. 747. XI. Century. Cat. A lost leaf contained 37,6 �LA3���������LA1�]�LA0��LA3����-38,20 ��� 2�LA1���LA3�. �LA1�In Br.-M. = �LA3��LA1�j.

58 Rome, Bibl.Vat., Regin.gr.10. XI. Century. Through loss of a leaf the ms lacks MT 39,40 �LA3��� 3�LA1���LA3�-40,17 󡞤���LA1�. In Br.-M. = k

59 Glasgow., Univ. Libr., BE 7�MDOL�b�MDNM�. 10. XV. Century. In Br.-M. = l.

64 Paris, Bibl.Nat., Gr.2. X. Century. Hexaplaric notes.

68 Venice, Bibl. Marc., Gr.5. XV. Century.

71 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Gr.1. XIII. Century

72 Oxford, Bodl. Libr., Canon.gr. 35. XII. Century. The ms lacks 25,9 �LA3���� 5�LA1���LA3�-25,16  ���LA1� �LA3�37,10 ������-�� 38,18 �����������  40,10 �����-40,30. �LA1�In Br.-M. = �LA3��LA1�m. 

73 Rome, Bibl. Vat, Vat.gr.746. XI.-XII. Century. Cat.

74 Florence, Bibl. Laur., S.Marco 700. Late XIII. Century.

75 Oxford, Univ.College 52. Written in 1125. In Br.-M. = n.

76 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Gr.4. XIII. Century. For �LA3�1,14 �-2,2 ���LA1� and �LA3�26,22 󡞤��-37�LA1� e silentio conclusions are invalid.

77 Rome, Bibl.Vat., Vat.gr. 748. XIII.-XIV. Century. Cat.

78 Rome, Bibl. Vat., gr. 383. XIII. Century. Cat.

82 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Coisl. 3. XII. Century. In Br.-M. = o.

84 Rome, Bibl. Vat., Vat.gr. 1901. X.-XI. Century. Through loss of leaf the ms lacks 13,17 �LA3����������-15,21 ��.�LA1�

85 Rome, Bibl.Vat., Vat.gr. 2058. X. Century. Hexaplaric notes. In Br.-M. = z.

106 Ferrara, Bibl.Comm. 187 I. XIV. Century. Lacking is �LA3�29,33 �����-35. �LA1�In Br.-M.= p.

107 Ferrara, Bibl Comm. 188 I. Written in 1334. Lacking is 29,30-31 �LA3����मLA1� 1��LA3�.

108 �LA1�Rome, Bibl. Vat., Vat.gr. 330. XIII. Century. Hexaplaric notes. In Br.-M. = �MDIT�b�MDNM�.

118 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Gr.6. XI.-XII. Century. Through leaf loss the ms lacks 23,17 �LA3����-24,8 �����  29,27 �����-30,10 ���� 2�LA1���LA3�.

120 �LA1�Venice, Bibl. Marc., Gr.4. XI. Century. Because of leaf loss the ms lacks 23,26�LA3� ����-25,23 �����LA1�[�LA3�����  33,7 ���2�LA1���LA3�-34,26. �LA1�In Br.-M. = q.

121 Venice, Bibl. Marc., Gr.3. X. Century. Due to leaf loss the ms lacks 21,29 �LA3���� 2�LA1���LA3�-27,16 �����󣜮LA1�[�LA3����.�LA1� In Br.-M. = y. 

122 Venice, Bibl. Marc., Gr.6. XV. Century.

125 Moscow, formerly Syn. Bibl., Gr.30. XIV. Century. The ms lacks 29,30-33 �LA3����� 1�LA1���LA3�.

126 �LA1�Moscow, formerly Syn. Bibl., Gr.19. Written in 1475. Cat.

127 Moscow, formerly Syh. Bibl., Gr.31. X. Century. 1,1-6,26 was restored and contains hexaplaric notes.

128 Rome, Bibl. Vat., Vat.gr. 1657, XIII. Century. Hexaplaric notes.

129 Rome, Bibl. Vat., Vat.gr. 1252. XI.-XII. Century. In Br.-M. = r.

130 Vienna, Nat. Bibl., Theol.gr.23. XII.-XIII. Century. From 16,28 apparently the writer used another parent text; in that part the ms contains hexaplaric notes. In H.-P. = 131; in Br.-M. = s.

131 Vienna, Nat. Bibl., Theol.gr.57. Late X. Century.

134 Florence, Bibl.Laur., Plutei V 1. XI. Century. In Br.-M. = t.

135 Basel, Univ. Bibl.,A.N.III.13. X. Century. Cat. Hexaplaric notes. Lacks
5,10-14  15,1 �LA3����������LA1�-fin libri. The text of 13,11-15,1 �LA3�������LA1� was restored in XIII. Century. In Br.-M. = c�MDSD�2�MDNM�.

246 Rome, Bibl. Vat., Vat.gr. 1238. Written in 1195. In part a palimpsest, which 246 overwrote.

313 Athens, Nat. Bibl., 43. XI. Century. Cat.

314 Athens, Nat. Bibl., 44. XIII. Century. In Br.-M. = w.

318 Athos, �LA3����������� �LA1�598�LA3� �LA1�(formerly 511). X.-XI. Century.

319 Athos, �LA3����������� 600�LA1� (formerly 513). Written in 1021.

321 Athos, �LA3������������LA1� 603 (formerly 516). XIV. Century. Hexaplaric notes.

343 Athos �LA3�����LA1�, 352. X. Century. Hexaplaric notes.

344 Athos, �LA3�������������, 24�LA1�. X. Century. Hexaplaric notes. In Br.-M. 
= v.

346 Athos, �LA3����������LA1�, 53. Written in 1326. Hexaplaric notes. Lacking are 1,1-30,20 �LA3����������  36,�LA1�1�LA3� ����������LA1�-fin libri.

370 Rome, Bibl. Vat., Chigi R. VIII.61. XI. Century. Due to leaf loss the ms lacks 14,24 �LA3����LA1�]�LA0��LA3�򜣙���� 2�LA1���LA3�-19,11 ����  22,11 � ����-25,29 ���  28,22 ��������-33,15  34,33 �����LA1�]�LA0��LA3����-�LA1�fin libri.

376 Escorial, Real Bibl., �LA3���LA1�-II.5. XV. Century. in Br.-M. = c.

381 Escorial, Real Bibl., �LA3���LA1�-I-13. XI. Century. It lacks 2,18�LA3� ��-4,19 �����LA1�[�LA3����� �LA1�due to loss of leaf.

392 Grottaferrata, Bibl.della Badia, A.�LA3��.�LA1�I. X. Century

407 Jerusalem, Patr. Bibl., �LA3������ ������LA1� 2. End of IX. Century. Due to leaf loss the ms lacks 9,18�LA3� ����-17,13 �����.�LA1� The text of 21,22-22,16�LA3� ��������LA1� and �LA3�23,22 ��� ��������-24,18 ����LA1� 1� was restored in XIII. Century. In Br.-M. = u.

413 Istanbul, Bibl. d. Serail, 8. XII. Century. Cat.

414 Leiden, Univ. Bibl., Voss. gr. in fol.13. XIV. Century. Cat.

416 Leipzig, Univ. Bibl., Gr.16. X. Century. Hexaplaric notes. Due to loss of leaves the ms lacks 1,1-32,16.

422 London, Brit. Mus., Add. 35123. XII.-XIII. Century. Cat. Through leaf loss the passage 21,23-32�LA3� ������LA1� is absent. Change of scribe occurred after 2,21 �LA3��� ���.

424 �LA1�London, Brit. Mus., Burney 34.�LA3� �. �LA1�Century. Cat.�LA3� ��LA1�he ms contains the following pieces of text: 1,1  1,10 init-�LA3����������LA1�[�LA3����� 2,1�LA1� �LA3� 2,11�LA1� init-�LA3������LA1�[�LA3����  2,15 �������-������ 1�LA1���LA3�  2,23�LA1� init�LA3�-��� 1�LA1���LA3�  3,2-8 �����󟘠 3,19 �LA1�init�LA3�-�����  4,3 ��� 4�LA1���LA3�-4 ��� 2�LA1���LA3�  4,9 �LA1�init-�LA3�����  4,18 ����-19 ��������LA1�  4,24-27 �LA3��򞣦�  5,1�LA1� init-�LA3���� ��� �LA1�(pro �LA3�����LA1�)�LA3� 5,5-6 ��LA1�[�LA3��������  5,14 �LA1�init-�LA3�������  5,21 ������-�LA1�fin 6,20 init-�LA3���� 2�LA1���LA3� 7,10 �LA1�init�LA3�-�����LA1�[�LA3����� 3�LA1���LA3�  7,14-15 �� 2�LA1���LA3�  8,1�LA1� init-�LA3������  8,16 �LA1�init�LA3�-��  8,20�LA1� init�LA3�-���  9,1 �	�LA1�init-�LA3���  9,8 �LA1�init-�LA3��������  9,17�LA1�-�LA3�18 �������  9,30 ���������-31 ���LA1�[�LA3���������  10,1�LA1� init�LA3�-�� 10,12 �LA1�init-�LA3�����  10,21-22 12,1-7 ������ 12,11 ��� �LA1�ult-12 �LA3������  12,21 �LA1�init-22 �LA3������  12,29 �LA1�init-�LA3��������� 12,37�LA1� init�LA3�-38 ����  12,43 �LA1�init-46 �LA3���� 13,3�LA1�init�LA3�-���LA3������� 13,11 �LA1�init-12 �LA3����� 1�LA1���LA3�  13,19 �LA1�init-�LA3����LA1�[�LA3�������  14,2 �LA1�init�LA3�-�������  14,11 ��-1�LA1�2�LA3� �����LA1�[�LA3������� 1�LA1���LA3�  14,21 ��� 3�LA1���LA3�-22 ��� 15,1 ��ࣜ�-2 ����� 1�LA1���LA3�  15,8 ������LA3�-9 ��LA1�[�LA3�����  15,15 �LA1�init-�LA3��򦣦�  15,23 �LA1�init-�LA3�24 ��LA1�[�LA3���  16,1 �� -�LA1�fin  16,9 init-10�LA3� ������ 16,�LA1�15 init-�LA3���  16,19 �LA1�init�LA3�-�LA3�20 ��� 1�LA1���LA3�  16,27 16,33 17,3 17,11 �LA1�init-�LA3������ 2�LA1���LA3�  18,2 �LA1�init-�LA3�3 ����  19,2 ��� 3�LA1���LA3�-4 �����  19,11 �������� - 12�LA1� fin  19,18�LA3� ��������-25,17 �������  25,22 �LA1�init-�LA3�����LA1� 3�  �LA3�25,30 �LA1�init-�LA3���������LA1� 2�  26,1 init-3�LA3� ��LA1�[�LA3�����  26,14�LA1� init-�LA3�������LA1�[�LA3��������  26,18 �LA1�init-19 �LA3����LA1�[�LA3���򡦤��  26,26�LA1� init-�LA3����LA1� 2�  26,31 26,36 init-�LA3��������LA1��MDIT��MDNM��LA3��LA3��� 27,1 �LA1�init-�LA3������ 2�LA1���LA3�  27,4 �LA1�init-�LA3�������  27,20 �LA1�init-�LA3������LA1�[�LA3�������  28,6 28,9 28,15 �LA1�init-�LA3���࣠��� 28,27 �LA1�init-�LA3���� �LA1�(in a plus)  28,32 init-�LA3������LA1�[�LA3��ࣘ  28,15 ��� 2�LA1���LA3�-36 �����  29,1 �LA1�init�LA3�-������ 2�LA1���LA3�  29,10 ��� 2�LA1���LA3�-������  29,20 ��� 3�LA1���LA3�-����� 2�LA1���LA3�  29,34�LA1� init�LA3�-�LA3������LA1�[�LA3������  29,38 �LA1�init-�LA3���ࣦ��  30,1-2 �����  30,11-12 ��  30,17-18 ��� 2�LA1���LA3�  30,22-23 ����  30,34 �LA1�init -�LA3���������  31,1-2 ��󜢜��  31,12-13 ����  31,18 �LA1�init-�LA3����  32,7-8 ����  32,19 �LA1�init�LA3�-20 ������LA1�(pro �LA3�������LA1�)�LA3�  32,30 �LA1�init-31 �LA3�����LA1�[�LA3������� ��  34,1 �LA1�init-�LA3���� 2�LA1���LA3�  34,10 �LA1�init�LA3�-��  34,27 �LA1�init�LA3�-����  35,1 �LA1�init-�LA3�20 �LA3������  35.30 �LA1�init-�LA3���  36,8 �LA1�init-�LA3�����  36,15 �LA1�init�LA3�-��������LA1�[�LA3������  36,23 �LA1�init�LA3� -25 ������LA1�[�LA3������ 36,30 �LA1� 36,20 init-fin 36,33 init-�LA3���  36,38 �LA1�init-�LA3�39 ������  37,1 �LA1�init-�LA3�2 ���� 1�LA1���LA3�  37,3 �LA1�init-�LA3�����󣜤��  37,5�LA1� init-�LA3��������  37,7 �LA1�init�LA3�-��LA1�[�LA3������ 1�LA1���LA3�  38,5 �LA1�init-�LA3�6 ��LA1�[�LA3������    38,12 �LA1�init-�LA3�13 �������  38,19 �LA1�init-�LA3���LA1�i�LA3������LA1� 3��LA3� �LA1� 39,23 init-�LA3���������  40,15 �LA1�init-�LA3��� ��� �LA1�(pro�LA3� ���LA1�)�LA3� �LA1�Subscriptio�LA3�

426 �LA1�London, Brit. Mus., Add. 39585 (formerly Curzon 66). Beginning of XI. Century. Missing is 36,6�LA3�-34 ����. �LA1�Scribal change in�LA3� 20,1 �LA1�between �MDNM��LA3���� ������.�LA1� In Br.-M. = x.

458 Messina, Bibl. Univ., S.Salv. 62. XII. Century. Hexaplaric notes. Lacking is 26,10 �LA3���� 1�LA1���LA3�-14  26,16-20. �LA1�Change of scribe in �LA3�26�LA1�,�LA3�29�LA1� between �LA3���������� ������.

500 �LA1�Vienna, Nat. Bibl., Suppl.gr. 176 (formerly Nikolsburg, Dietr. Schlossbibl. II 221) XI.-XII. Century. Cat�LA3�. �LA1�Change of scribe in 10,12 between �LA3��������� ����LA1� and between 21,17 fin and 16 init.

508 Oxford, Bodl. Library., Auct.F.432. Written in 817. Contents: 14,24-15,3.

509 St.Petersburg, �Ouff. Staatsbibl., Gr. 62. IX.-X. Century. In Br.-M. = a�MDSD�2�MDNM��LA3��LA1�.

527 Paris, Bibl. de l'Arsenal, 8415. XIV. Century. The text 28,22-34 �LA3����� 3�LA1�� and �LA3�29,42 ������-30,10 ���मLA1� are written twice. The first doublet
is after 28,7 �LA3�����LA1�, the second aft�LA3��LA1�er 30,23 �LA3�������LA1�. These are designated as 527(2�) in the edition.

537 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Coisl. 184. XIII.Century.

550 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Gr.128. XII. Century. Cat.

551 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Gr.129. XIII. Century. Cat.

552 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Gr.130 (to 12,36); Gr. 132 (from 12,27.) XV. Century. Cat.

610 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Suppl.gr. 609. XIV. Century. Lacking is 29,30-33 �LA3����� 1�LA1���LA3�.

615 �LA1�Patmos�LA3�, ��ᤤ�� ��q ����暦� 216.�LA1� XI. Century. Cat. The text 21,32 �LA3�����LA1�]�LA0��LA3���󡞤�MDNM��LA3�-22,8 ��򘡘���LA1�[�LA3������ �LA1�has not been collated, since it was not available to the Untersuchung.

618 Patmos, �LA3���ᤤ�� ��q ����暦��LA1� 410. XIII. Century.

619 Patmos, �LA3���ᤤ�� ��q ����暦��LA1� 411. XV. Century.

628 St. Petersburg, �Ouff. Staatsbibl. Gr. 124. XIII. Century. Cat.

630 St. Petersburg, �Ouff. Staatsbibl., Papadopulos-Kerameus 8. XII. Century. Due to leaf loss the text 16,32 �LA3�����LA1��LA0��LA3���LA1�]�MDNM��LA3������LA1�-18,9 �LA3����������LA1� �LA1�is missing.
The d�LA3���LA1�maged passages 40,�LA3�2�LA1�2 �LA3�󡞤��-25 �LA1�and �LA3�40,31 ����LA1�]�LA0��LA3�������󘤮LA1�-fin libri were restored�LA3� �LA1�by 630�MDOL�s�MDNM�.

646 Rome, Bibl. Vat.,Barber. gr. 474. XII. Century. Cat. Hexaplaric notes.
Due to leaf loss the following texts are lacking: 2,22 �LA3�������-4,24  12,36 ����-14,21 ������ 3�LA1���LA3�  19,6-20,7  25,37-28,14 �LA1�and 34,1-39,33 �LA3����. �LA1�The text 16,27 �LA3����-17,6 ���򘤮LA1� could not be collated, since a copy of the page
was missing. Change of scribe in 12,5 16,1 and 24,11.

664 Rome, Bibl. Vat.,Pii II. gr. 20. XIV. Century. Due to leaf loss 36,23�LA3� ��-37,7 �����󣜤���LA1� is lacking.

707 Sinai, Monastery of St. Catherine, Cod.gr.1. X.-XI. Century. Hexaplaric notes. The ms is very faded, and e silentio conclusions are not allowed. A leaf with 30,8 �LA3�����-31,17 �������LA1� was removed, and a later scribe filled in the space with 30,8 init-31,18 �LA3���������LA1�. This text is designated by 707�MDOL�I�MDNM� in the edition.

708 Sinai, Monastery of St. Catherine, Cod. gr.2. X. Century. Cat. Hexaplaric notes.

730 Venice, Bibl. Marc., Gr.15. XII. Century. Cat. Hexaplaric notes.

739 Venice, Bibl. Marc., Gr.534. X. Century. Cat. Scribal change after 16,34 �LA3��򦧦� 20,4 21,3.

761 �LA1�Z�uurich, Zentralbibl., C.11. X�LA3���LA1�II. Century. Cat.

767 Athos, �LA3�����LA1�, 603. XIII.-XIV. Century. Missing are 28,23-30,16  and because of leaf loss: 1,1-21,36 �LA3������LA1�[�LA3����������LA1� and 40,19 �LA3����LA1�-fin libri.

799 Athens, Nat. Bibl., 2491. Written in 1280.

				    	3. Uncollated Manuscripts

	The following late mss were not collated, since their texts have no great importance.

83 Lisbon, Arch. de Torre do Tombo, 669. XVI. Century. Cat.

350 Berlin, Staatsbibl., Phill. 1405. Written cir. 1540. Cat.

373 Escorial, Real Bibl., �LA3��-�-6�LA1�. Written in 1586. Cat.

461 �LA3�������,�LA1� 216. XVI. Century.

483 Munich, Bayer. Staatsbibl., Gr.82. XVI. Century. Cat.

553 Paris, Bibl. Nat., Gr.131. XVI. Century. Cat.

702 Rome, Bibl. Vat., Vat.gr. 2131. XVI. Century. Cat.

723 Turin, Bibl. Naz., B.III. 15. XVI. Century. Cat.

Not available was

Rumania, �LA3���. �. 371�LA1�. Cat.

The following mss were burned:

364 �LA3��⚘ ��㢘���, ��� 68. ���LA1�V. Century.

716 Smyrna, �LA3��v�����. �����,�LA1� A-1. XII. Century. Cat.

						   4. Papyri and Fragments

805 Jerusalem, Rockefeller Museum, 7Q1LXX Ex. Ca 100 B.C.E. Very fragmentary. Contents: 28,4-6 7. Edition: M. Baillet, Discoveries in the Judaean Desert in Jordan III, Oxford 1962, 142-143.

808 Vienna, Nat. Bibl., P.Vind. G.39210 (= P.Rainer 4,3). V. Century. Very fragmentary. Contents: 16,32 17,1 2. Edition: Mitt. aus der Papyrus~
sammlung der Nationalbiblothek in Wien. N.S. IV: Griechische literarische Papyri christlichen Inhalts, ed. by P. Sanz. Vienna 1946, 17-18.

835 Berlin, Staatl. Mus., P. 11766 + 14046. IV. Century. Partly fragmen~tary. Contents: 5,14-17  6,22-25  7,15-17. Edition: K.Treu, Neue Berliner Septuagintafragmente, APF 20 (1970), 47.

836 Berlin, Staatl. Mus., P.14039. III.-IV. Century. Very fragmentary. Contents: 34,35-35,8. Edition: as 835. Pp.52-53.

843 Oxford, Bodl. Libr., Gr.bibl.g.(P). IV.-V. Century. Fragmentary. Contents: 4,4-6. Edition: P.E.Kahle, Bala'izah 1, London 1954, 297-298.

908 Urbana, University Classical Museum, GP 1074 (= P.Oxy. 1074). Early III. Century. Very fragmentary. Contents: 31,13-14 32,7-8. Edition: A.S. Hunt. The Oxyrhynchus Papy�LA3��LA1�ri 8, London 1911.

909 London, Brit. Mus., Pap. 2053 recto (=P.Oxy. 1075). III. Century. Fragmentary. Contents: 40,17-fin libri. Edition: as 908.

914 New York, Pierpont Morgan LIbrary, Pap.G. 191. VI. Century. Frag~men~~tary. Contents: 19,1-2 5-6. Edition: B.P.Grenfell and A.S.Hunt, The Amherst Papyri 2, London 1901.

960 Berlin, Staatl. Mus., P.13994. V.-VI. Century. Contents (damaged): 23,10-13  31,12-13. The text 31,12-13 follows without separation. Edition: BK 8: Berliner Septuagintafragmente, ed. by O.Stegm�uuller, Berlin 1931, 10-15

970 Heidelberg, Univ. Bibl., Pap. Graec. No.8. II. Century. Fragmentary. Contents: 8,3 5-11 12-20. Editions: Ver�ouffentlichungen aus den badischen Papyrus-Sammlungen 4: Griechische Papyri (Urkunden, Briefe, Schreib~tafeln, Ostraka, etc.) with two tables, ed. by Fr. Bilabel, Heidelberg 1924, 24-27.  H.J.Dorn, V.Rosenberger, D.Trobisch, ZPE 61(1985), 115-121 and 65(1986), 106.

972 Milan, Univ. Statale, Pap.gr.22. IV. Century. Defective. Contents: 29,21-24. Edition: A. Vogliano, Papiri della Universit�ag di Milano, Milan 1937.

978 Berlin, Staatl. Mus., P.16990. IV. Century. Partly fragmentary. Contents: 34,18-20. Edition: as 835, 51-52.
             
1000 Paris, Sorbonne, P. Inv.2166. III. Century. Fragmentary. Contents: 40,5-13 19-25. Edition: P.Collart, Les papyrus Th�eaodore Reinach 2, Cairo 1940.

						5.Collated mss. without Rahlfs Number.�LA3�

�LA1�Oxf 4 = Oxford,�LA3� �LA1�Bodl.�LA3� �LA1�Libr�LA3�., �LA1�Gr.�LA3� �LA1�Bibl.�LA3� �LA1�f.4. IV. Century(?). Papyrus. Fragmentary. Contents: 9,1-2 6-8 10-11 14. Edition: V. Spottorno and N.Fern�aandez Marcos, Nuevos Fragmentos del Exodo Griego, Emerita 44 (1976), 385-395. A very hebraizing Text, which is clearly not a LXX text.

Carl 59 = Copenhagen, Univ. Bibl., P. Carlsberg 49�MDOL�1�MDNM�. V. Century. Frag~men~tary. Contents: 3,1-6 12 13 16-19. It is part of the same Codex as Strass 748 (cf Genesis 29). The text has been fully revised and has no signifi~cance for the LXX.

�LA3�						 6.�LA1�Greek Patristic Citations.

	For the problems which are involved in the proper use of Patristic Biblical citations see Genesis 29-30.
   Over against former editions with regard to citations which also occur in the N.T., the influence of the latter on the patristic writers is assessed as much higher than in former works. In most of these instances generally speaking only the NT citations are given in the edition. Variants in the Fathers are only mentioned in cases where NT influence can with certainly be
excluded.

�LA3�   �LA1�The following authors were consulted�FN1�RP�  A collection of citations from patristic sources designated by �	 were made available to me through the kindness of the Centre d'Analyse et de Documentation Patristiques in Strassburg.�:

ActPh		= The Acts of Phileas Bishop of Thmus; P. Chester Beatty XV,
			   	ed. A.Pietersma. Geneva 1984

Anast		= Anastasius Sinaita (PG 89)

Ath			= Athanasius I-III (Pg 25-27)

Barn			= Epistula Barnabae (ed. F.X.Funk-K.Bihlmeyer, 1956)�	

Bas 			= Basilius Magnus Caesariensis I-IV (PG 29-32)

BasSel		= Basilius Seleuciensis (PG 85)

Chr			= Chrysostomus I-XVIII (PG 47-64)

Clem 		= Clemens Alexandrinus I-III (GCS 12, 15, 17; ed. O.St�auhlin) �	

ClemR		= Clemens Romanus (ed. F.X.Funk-K.Bihlmeyer, 1956) �	

Cyr			= Cyrillus Alexandrinus I-X (PG 68-77)�FN1�RP�  Cyr IV 600 and V 189 show only an abbreviated text, from which citations from Exod 4,12-13 and 18,13-26 have been omitted. These are accordingly cited according to Pusey.�
	�MDIT�Ad�MDNM��LA3��LA1�		= De Adoratione et cultu in spiritu et veritate
	�LA3��MDIT��LA1�Gl�MDNM��LA3��LA1�			= Glaphyra in Pentateuchum

				The edition of Auberts (PG 68-77) is in its entirely so full
				of errors that the Biblical citations give no trustworthy picture
				of the text used by Cyr. Since Exod is widely cited in both �MDIT�Ad�MDNM� and
				�MDIT�Gl�MDNM��LA3��LA1�, the most important mss of both works have been collated, and
				citations for both rest exclusively on ms witnesses, except for
				the pagination which has been taken over from Migne. Not noted
				are grammatical and orthographic variants, nor obvious scribal
				errors due to homoioteleuton. It is clear therefore that e silentio
				ocnclusions are not valid; the citation of an individual Cyr ms
          essentially implies the existence of a further worthwhile reading.

				For �MDIT�Ad�MDNM��LA3��LA1� the following mss were collated:
				E = Fragmente of a papyrus found in the Fayyum, VI./VII.
					Century: 
					1. Dublin, contains PG 68, 520-532; 588-589, fragmentary.
					Edition: J.H.Bernard, On some fragments of an uncial ms.
					of S.Cyrill of Alexandria, written on papyrus. Trans. of
					the Royal Irish Academy. Vol.29. Part 18,653-672. Dublin
					2. Vienna, P.Gr.Vind.  19899-19908. Contents: PG 68,589
					-597. Fragmentary. Edition: P.Sanz, Neue Bl�autter des
					Dublin-Pariser Papyruscodex des Kyrillos von Alexandria,
					Nationalbibl. in Wien, Griechische Literarische Papyri
					Christlichen Inhalts I, Pp.111-124, Vienna 1946.
					3. Paris, Louvre E. 10295. Contents: PG 68,532-588, almost
    				complete, not edited.�FN1�RP�  I am grateful to M.Geerard and C. Lage of the Corpus Christianorum Series Graeca, Catholic Univ. Louvain, who graciously prepared a copy of the Paris ms for the Unternehmen.�
				P = Paris, Bibl. Nat., Suppl.gr. 150. Written in 1304.
				R = Rome, Bibl. Vat., Vat.gr. 599, fol.1-19�LA3��LA1��MDOL�r�MDNM�(= PG 68,133-220),
					 X. Century; fol. 19�MDOL�r�MDNM��LA3��LA1�.-fin (= PG 68,220-588), XIII.-XIV
                Century.
				V = Rome, Bibl.Vat., Vat.gr. 598. XII. Century. Fol.49-61 (= 
					PG 68, 449-509) was restored in XIV. Century.

				For �MDIT�Gl�MDNM��LA3��LA1� the following mss were collated:

				F = Florence, Bibl Laur., Plut. V.15. XIII Century.
				P = as with �MDIT�Ad�MDNM��LA3��LA1�

CyrHier	= Cyrillus Hierosolymitanus (PG 33,331-1180)

DialTA	= F.C.Conybeare, The Dialogues of... Timothy and Aquila, Anec~-
				  dota Oxoniensia, Class. Ser. I, 8 Oxford, 1898

Did			= Didymus Alexandrinus, Kommentar zu Sacharja (Tura-Papyrus)
 			     (SC 83-85; ed. H.L.Doutreleau, 1962) �	. Cited according to the
				  Papyrus page

�MDIT�Eccl�MDNM��LA3��LA1�			= Kommentar zum Ecclesiastes (Tura Pypyrus) Pt. I.1 (Ch. 1-
			     2,14) ed. G.Binder & L.Liesenborghs; Pt.II (Ch. 3-4,12) ed.
				  M. Gronewald; Pt.III (Ch. 5-6) ed. J.Kremer; Pt.IV (Ch. 7-
				  8,8) ed. J.Kramer & B.Krebber; Pt.V. (Ch. 9,8-10,20) ed. M.
				  Gronewald; Pt.VI (Ch. 11-12) ed. G.Binder & L.Liesenborghs,
				  PTA 25,22,13,16,24,9. Cited acccording to Papyrus page &
				  Column

�MDIT�Gen�MDNM�			= Sur la Gen�egse, SC 233 et 244, ed. par P. Nautin. Cited as �MDIT�Eccl�MDNM�

�MDIT�Hiob�MDNM�			= Kommentar zu Hiob (Tura Papyrus), PTA 1,2,3; Vol. 1 & 2 ed 
            A. Hendrichs; Vol.3 ed. U.& D.Hagedorn & L. Koenen. Cited as
				  �MDIT�Eccl�MDNM�

�MDIT�Ps�MDNM�				= Psalmenkommentar (Tura Papyrus), I-V ed.. L.Koenen & R.
				  Merkelbach, PTA 7,4,8,6,12. Cited as �MDIT�Eccl�MDNM�

DionAl		= Dionysius Alexandrinus (.Feltoe, �MDIT��LA3���������MDNM�.�LA1� The Letter and
				  Other Remains of Dionysius of Alexandria, Cambridge
				  1904 [Cambridge Patr. Texts]�	 

Epiph		= Epiphanius I-III (GCS 25,31,37; ed. K. Holl
            
Eus			= Eusebius Caesariensis I,II,III 1,IV,VI,VIII 1,2 (GCS 7; ed.
				  E.Klostermann. GCS 9,1-3: ed. E.Schwartz. GCS 11,14; ed.
				  E.Klostermann. GCS 23; ed. I.A.Heikel. GCS 43, 1,2; ed. K.
				  Mras). IX (GCS; ed. J.Ziegler)

Eust			= Eustathius Antiochenus (PG 18, 613-704)

GregNaz	= Gregorius Nazienzanus I-IV (PG 35-38)�	

GregNys	= Gregorius Nyssenus I-IX (W.Jaeger, Gregorii Nysseni Opera,
				  Berlin/Leiden 1921ff.)�	

Hipp			= Hippolytus �	
					�MDIT�Dan�MDNM�		= Commentaire sur Daniel. SC 14.
							  ed.G.Bardy and M. Lefevre

					�LA1��MDIT�Noet�MDNM�		= Contr les her�easies, ed. P. Nautin
				
					�MDIT�Elenchos�MDNM�	= Elenchos (GCS 26 ed. P. Wendland)

HymenHier = Hymenaeus Hierosolymitanus. Ad Paulum Samosatenum. 
				  Ed. G. Bardy �	, Cited by page

Ios			= Iosephus, Flavius (B.Niese, Opera. Berlin 1885-1895)

					�MDIT�Ant�MDNM�		= Antiquitates Iudaicae

Isid			= Isidorus Pelusiota (PG 78)

Iust			= Iustinus Martyr (ed. H.Hemmer & P.Lejay. 1909 �	

					�MDIT�Dial�MDNM�		= Dialogus cum Tryphoni (ed. G.
							  Archambault)

					�MDIT�Apol�MDNM� 	= Apologia I (ed. L. Pautigny)

Max			= Maximus (PG 4)

Mel			= Melito (SC 123; ed. O. Perler, 1966) �	

Meth		= Methodius Olympius (SC 95; ed. H. Musurillo & V.H.
            Debidour, 1963) �	

Or			= Origenes I-IV, VIII, IX, X, XII (GCS 2,3 �	; ed. P. Koetschau.
            GSC 6: ed. E. Klostermann. GCS 10 �	; ed. E. Preuschen. GCS 33;
				  ed, W.A. Baehrens. GCS 49 �	; ed. M. Rauer. GCS 40; ed. E.
				  Klostermann. GCS 41,1 ed. E. Klostermann. GCS 40,2; ed.	
				  E. Klostermann  & l. Fr�uuchtel)

					�MDIT�Cel�MDNM��LA3��LA1�		= Contra Celsum I-VIII (SC 132,136,147,
							  150; ed. M. Borret, 1967-1969)�	

					�MDIT�Eph�MDNM��LA3��LA1�		= The Commentary of Origen upon the Epistle
							  of the Ephesians (JThSt 3 (1902);
							  ed. J.A.F. Gregg) �	

					�MDIT�Pasch�MDNM�	= Sur la P�acque. ed. O.Gu�earaud & P. Nautin �	
		
					�MDIT�Phil�MDNM��LA3��LA1�		= Philocalia, 1-27 (SC 302; ed. N.d.Lange. 
							  SC 226; ed. E. Junod)

					�MDIT�Rom�MDNM�		= Le Commentaire d'Orig�egne sur Rom 3,5-5.7
							  ed. J. Scherer �	

					�MDIT�Sel�MDNM�		= Selecta in Exodum (PG 12)

					�MDIT�Sel in Ezech�MDNM�	= Selecta in Ezechielem (PG 13)

					�MDIT�Sel Ps�MDNM��LA3��LA1�	= Selecta in Psalmos (PG 12)

Pamph			= Pamphilius Caesariensis, Apologia pro Origene (PG 17, 
					  541-616) �	

Passio Pionii  = Passio Pionii, Acta Martyrum Selecta ed. O.v.Gebhardt �	

Phil				= Philon Iudaeus ALexandrinus (Opera; ed. L. Cohn & P.
					  Wendland, Berlin 1896ff)

Phil �MDIT�Ex�MDNM��LA3��LA1�			= Quaestiones in ... Exodum: fragmenta graeca, Introduction,
  					  texte critique et notes par E.Petit, Les Oeuvres de Phil
					  d'Alexandrie per R.Arnaldes, J.Pouilloux et C.Mond�easert
					  33, Paris 1978 �	

Procop			= Procopius Gazaeus (PG 87) Collations for Notes in App.II
					  are based on ms: Munich, Bayer. Staatsbibl. Gr.358. IX.
					  Century

PsClem		= Pseudo-Clementina (GCS 42; ed. B. Rehm) �	

PsHipp �MDIT�Pasc�LA1�ha�MDNM�  = Pseudo-Hippolytus, Homilia de Pascha. SC 27; ed.
					  P.Nautin �	

PsIust			= Pseudo-Iustinus Martyr, Cohortatio ad Graecos. ed.
					  I.C.Th. Otto 1849 �	
					 
Ptol				= Ptolemaeus Gnosticus, Epistula ad Floram. SC 24; ed.
					  G. Quispel �	

Sev				= Severianus Gabalitanus (PG 56, 429-516)

Th				= Theodorus Mopsuestenus, Commentarius in XII Prophetas,
                 ed. H.N.Sprenger, G�outtinger Orientforschungen. V.Reihe,
					  Bd.1 1977. Cited by pages

Theoph			= Theophilus of Antiochia, Ad Autolycum. SC 20; ed. G.
					  Bardy & J. Sender �	

Tht				= Theodoretus Cyrensis I-V (PG 80-84)

                    �MDIT�Dt�MDNM�		= Quaestiones in Deuteronomium (TECC 17)

						�MDIT�Ex�MDNM�	= Quaestiones in Exodum (TECC 17)

						�MDIT�Gen�MDNM��LA3��LA1�	= Quaestiones in Genesin (TECC 17)
 �LA3��MDIT��LA1�
�MDNM��LA3��LA1�						�MDIT�Ios�MDNM��LA3��LA1�	= Quaestiones in Josuam (TECC 17)

						�MDIT�Iud�MDNM��LA3��LA1�	= Quaestiones in Judices (TECC 17)

						�MDIT�Lev�MDNM��LA3��LA1�	= Quaestiones in Leviticum (TECC 17)

						�MDIT�Nm�MDNM��LA3��LA1�	= Quaestones in Numeros (TECC 17)

						�MDIT�Quaest�MDNM��LA3��LA1�	= Quaestiones et responsiones ad
      						  orthodoxos (= Pseudo-Iustinus; ed. I.C.
							  Th. Otto, Iustini Philosophi et Martyris
                                 Opera quae feruntur omnia. Vol.V,3,2.
							  Jena 1881) �	

						�LA3��MDIT��LA1�1-4 Regum�MDNM�  = Quaestiones in 1,2,3,4 Regum (TECC 32)

Titus			= Titus Bostrensis Episcopus (PG 18,1069-1278)

						II. The Old Versions

   In the ranking of the versions the Old Latin appears first in the Apparatus of which the mss are placed first in numerical order, and then the Fathers follow in alphabetical order; after this the other versions are listed in alphabetical order.
   For the problem of versional support in general, see Genesis 33-34.					

						1. The Old Latin Version = La�FN1�RP� I would like to express my gratitude to H.J.Frede and W. Thiele of the Vetus Latina Institut at Beuron, whose gracious support at all times made it possible forme to have free access to the immense amount of material of the Institut at the Institut itself. I was accordingly able to use freely its extensive collation of patristic citations as well as to make new collations of various mss.�

The  marginal notes of the following mss were collated:
  91: L�eaon, S. Isidoro, Codex Gothicus Legionensis. Written 960.
  92: L�eaon, S. Isidoro 1.3 (Legionensis 2). Written 1162. Copy of 91.
  93: Rome, Bibl.Vat., Vat.lat.4859. Written 1587. Copy of 91.
  94: Escorial, Biblioteca de S.Lorenzo 54. V.35. Written 1561.
  95: Madrid, Acad. de la Historia 2-3. XII. Century.
  96: Calahorra, Catedral 2. Written 1183.

   Mss 91-96 are Vulgate mss which contain marginal readings which are attributed to LXX, Al and T. Only 95 genrally fails to indicate their
derivation. The attributions LXX and GR (= Graecus), for which no distinction could be discovered, have not been noted in the apparatus, whereas 
readings of Al (aliter or alia) and T (tertius) are noted.  The notes designated
by Al (for aliter or alia) show a close relation to the readings of ms. 100. Since mss 92 and 93 are copies of ms 91,  only the readings of mss 91 94 95 and 96 are used in the apparatus. The collations were taken from T.Ayuso Marazuela, La Vetus Latina Hispana. II El Octateuco. TECC 6. Madrid 1967, though for impor~tant passages mss were checked.

100 Lyon, Bibl. de la Ville, Ms 403 + 1964. VII. Century. Contents: 1,1-7,19 �LA3�򘙛��  21,9 �����ࣘ - 36 �� 1�LA1���LA3�  25,24 ������-26,13 󡞤�� 2�LA1���LA3�  
27,6 �����LA1�-fin libri. Edition: U.Robert, Pentateuchi versio latina antiquissima e codice Lugdunensi. Paris 1881.

101 Naples, Bibl. Nazionale, lat.1. V. Century. Palimpsest. Contents: 3,3
�LA3�����-7 �MDIT��LA1�popu[lo]�MDNM�  3,7 �LA3���� ������-4,8 ��� �LA1�ult  10,27 �LA3�������-12,3 �MDIT��LA1�decima die�MDNM�
12,29 �LA3����-44 �����.�LA1� Edition: Bonifatius Fischer, Beitr�auge zur Geschichte
der lateinischen Bibeltexte. Freiburg 1986. 419-426.

102 Rome, Bibl.Vat.,Ottob. lat 66. VII.-VIII. Century. Vulgate ms, which has various gaps, some of which were restored according to an Old Latin parent. Contents: 10,13-15a  11,7-20  16,16-17,10  23,12-27,5. Edition:  C.Vercel~lone, Variae Lectiones Vulgatae Bibliorum I. Rome 1860, 307-310.

103 W�uurzburg, Univ. Bibl., Mp. theol. fol.64a. V. Century. Palimpsest.
Contents: 22,7 �LA3������-28 �������� �LA1� 25,,30 �LA3������� 2�LA1���LA3�-�LA1�26,12 fin  32,15 �LA3���� 2�LA1���LA3�-33 ���  33,13 �������� 2�LA1���LA3�-34,27 �����  35,13-36,1 �������  39,2 ��� 1�LA1���LA3�-40,31 ����� 1�LA1��. These pieces are at some places only fragmentary. Edition:
E. Ranke, Par palimpsestorum Wirceburgensium, Antiquissimae Veteris Tes~ta~meni versiones Latinae fragmenta. Vienna 1871.

104 Munich, Bayer. Staatsbibl., Lat. Monac. 6225. VI. Century. Palimpsest.
Contents (in part fragmentary): 9,15-10,24�LA3� ������  12,8 ����-14,4 �������  16,10 ���-20,5 ������ 2�LA1���LA3�  31,15 �����-33,7 ��� 1�LA1���LA3�  36,13 ���LA1�-fin libri. For chh.37-39 the ms has a text which in some parts, viz. 37,4-18  21b  38,5 7-8  39,1-23, has a text which shows very little points of contact
with the parallel Greek passages; these have not been collated for this edition.
Edition: L. Ziegler, Bruchst�uucke einer vorhieronymianischen �Uubersetzung des Pentateuch aus einem Palimpseste der K. Hof- und Staatsbibliothek zu
M�uunchen. Munich 1883.

106 Florence, Bibl. Medicea-Laurenziana, P.S.I., s.n. V. Century. Palimpsest. Contents: 8,16 �LA3��� �ࣘ-20 ����  8,28 �� ���-9,1 ���. �LA1�Edition: A.Vaccari, Papiri della Societa Italiana 12,2 (1951), 97-105: cf idem, Biblica 22(1941), 1-12.

111 Oxford, Bodl. Libr., Auct. F.4.32. Written cir 817. Contents: 14,24-15,3. See Rahlfs No. 508.

175 Constance, Weingartener Propheten-Fragmente mit Glossen. V. Century. Contents: 20,5-6 as gloss to Ezek. 18,2-4. Edition: A. Dold, Konstanzer
Altlateinische Propheten- und Evangelien-Bruchst�uucke mit Glossen. Text und
Arbeiten 7-9 (Beuron 1923), 176.

	For the text character of the Old Latin cf A.V.Billen, The Old Latin Text
of the Hexateuch, Cambridge 1927. As in Lev, Num, and Deut citations from mss and Patristic texts were not cited according to text types as in Gen. The character of the Old Latin texts of Exodus resembles that of Gen and Deut; it is not as homogenious as that of the books of Lev and Num.
   But also for Exodus it has to be pointed out that certain texts which render hexaplaric readings (La�MDOL�O�MDNM��LA3��LA1� in Gen) and PsPhil, and so not dependant on Old Latin, are cited within the group of Latin Fathers. The designation La is used when all Old Latin witnesses agree.
  Abbreviations for Latin patristic citations. The abbreviations placed in
parentheses are those of Frede, Verzeichnis, where all further information
may be found.

Ambr (AM) = Ambrosius of Milan
	�MDIT�Abr�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Abr) = De Abraham
	�MDIT�Cain�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (ca) = De Cain et Abel
	�MDIT�Ep�MDNM� (ep) = Epistulae 91
	�MDIT�Exam�MDNM� (ex) = Exameron
	�MDIT�Exh virg�MDNM� (exh) = Exhortatio virginitatis
	�MDIT�Fide�MDNM� (fi) = De fide ad Gratianum Augustum
  �MDIT�Fuga�MDNM� (fu) = De fuga saeculi
	�MDIT�Hel�MDNM� (Hel) = De Helia et ieunio
  �MDIT�Ios�MDNM� (Jos) = De Ioseph
	�MDIT�Isa�MDNM� (Is) = De Isaac vel anima
	�MDIT�Myst�MDNM� (my) = De mysteriis
  �MDIT�Off min�MDNM� (off) = De officiis minstrorum
	�MDIT�Paenit�MDNM� (pae) = De paenitentia
	�MDIT�Ps duod�MDNM� (Ps) = Explanatio de Psalmo XII
	�MDIT�Ps 118�MDNM� (118 Ps) = Expositio de Psalmo CXVIII
	�MDIT�Sp�MDNM� (sp) = De Spiritu Sancto libri 3
	�MDIT�Tob�MDNM� (Tb) = De Tobia

Ambrst (AMst) = Ambrosiaster
	�MDIT�Eph�MDNM� (Eph) = Commentarius in Epistulam ad Efesios
	�MDIT�Gal�MDNM� (Gal) = Commentarius in Epistulam ad Galatas
	�MDIT�Quaest�MDNM� (q) = Quaestiones Veteris et Novi Testamenti
 	�MDIT�Rom�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Rm) = Commentarius in Epistulam ad Romanos
  �MDIT�1Thess�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (1 Th) = Comentarius in Epistulam ad Thessalonicences Prima

Anast (ANAST) = Caesar Anastasius

Anast-II (ANAST II) = Pope Anastasius II

Apon (APO) = Aponius

Arnob (AR) = Arnobius the Younger
	�MDIT�Confl�MDNM� (cfl) = Conflictus Arnobii catholici cum Serapione Aegyptio

Aug (AU) = Augustinus
	�MDIT�Ad Valent�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (gr) = De gratia et libero arbitrio ad Valentinum et cum illo
                   monachos liber
	�MDIT�C Adim�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (AD) = Contra Adimantum
	�MDIT�C D�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (ci) = De civitate Dei libri 22
	�MDIT�Deut�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Dt) = Quaestiones de Deuteronomio
	�MDIT�Ench�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (ench) = Enchiridion ad Laurentium de fide et spe et caritate
	�MDIT�Ep�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (ep) = Epistulae
  �MDIT�Ex�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Ex) = Quaestiones de Exodo
	�MDIT�Faust�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Fau) = Contra Faustum Manicheum libri 33
	�MDIT�Gen ad litt�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Gn li) = De Genesi ad litteram libri 12
	�MDIT�Ioh Evang�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Jo) = In Iohannis Evangelium tractatus 124
	�MDIT�Ios�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Jos) = Quaesiones de Iesu Nave
	�MDIT�Iud�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Jdc) = Quaestiones de Iudicibus
	�MDIT�Iul�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Jul) = Contra Iulianum haeresis Pelagianae defensorem libri 6  
	�LA3��MDIT��LA1�Loc in hept�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (loc) = Locutionum in Heptateuchum libri 7
	�LA3��MDIT��LA1�Mend�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (men) = De mendacio
	�MDIT�Oper�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (op) = De fide et operibus
	�MDIT�Parmen�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Par) = Contra epistulam Parmeniani libri 3
	�MDIT�Petil�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Pet) = Contra litteras Petiliani libri 3
	�MDIT�Ps�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Ps) = Enarrationes in Psalmos
�MDIT�  Quaest VT�MDNM� (qVT) = De VIII quaestionibus ex Veteri Testamento
	�MDIT�Serm�MDNM� (s) = Sermones 544
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Ser Frang�MDNM� (sFra) = Sermones, ed. O..F.Frangipane
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Symb�MDNM� (sy) = De fide et symbolo
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Trin�MDNM� (tri) = De trinitate libri 15

Barn (BAR) = Epistula Barnabae

Bed (BED) = Beda Venerabilis
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Rat�MDNM� (rat) = De temporum ratione

BrevGoth (Brev,Goth.) = Breviarium Gothicum

Caes (CAE) = Caesariius of Arles
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Serm�MDNM� (s) = Sermones
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Trin�MDNM� (tri) = De mysterio S.Trinitatis

Cassior (CAr) = Cassiodorus Senator
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Compl�MDNM� (cpl) = Complexiones in epistulis Apostolorum et Actibus eorum et
                Apocalypsi
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Gal�MDNM� (Gal) = Expositio in Epistulae S.Pauli
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Inst�MDNM� (in) = Institutionum divinarum et humanarum lectionum libri 2
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Ps�MDNM� (Ps) = Expositio �MDIT�Psalmorum�MDNM�
	�LA3��MDIT��LA1�Rom�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Rm) = cf �MDIT�Gal�MDNM��LA3��LA1� supra

Chr (CHRY) = Chrysostomus

ClemR (CLE-R) = Clemens Romanus

Concil (CO) = Concilia Oecumenica

Concil Tol (CO-Tol) = Concilia Toletana

Concl Tur (CO-Tur) = Concilia Turonensia

Cyp (Cy) = Cyprianis of Carthage
	�MDIT�Ad Dem�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Dem) = Ad Demetrianum
	�MDIT�Ep�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (ep) = Epistulae
	�MDIT�Fortun�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Fo) = Ad Fortunatum
	�MDIT�Laps�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (lap) = De lapsis
	�MDIT�Quir�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (te) = Ad Quirinum (Testimoniorum libri 3)
	�MDIT�Unit�MDNM��LA3��LA3�  �LA1�(un) = De ecclsiae catholica unitate

CypGall (CY-G) = Cyprianus presbyter
	�MDIT�Hept�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (hept) = Heptateuchos

EpiphSchol (EP-SC) = Epiphanius Scholasticus
	�MDIT�Cant�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Ct) = Translation of Ct-Commentary of Philo of Karpasia

Eucher (EUCH) = Eucherius of Lyon
	�MDIT�Ad Sal�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (inst) = Instructionum ad Salonium libri 2

Evagr EVA-A) = Evagrius of Antioch

EvagrGall (EVA-G) = Evagrius Gallicus

Fil (FIL) = Filastrius of Brescia

FirmMat (FIR) = Firmicus Maternus
	�MDIT�Err�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (err) = De errore profanorum religionum

Fulg (FU) = Fulgentius of Ruspe
	�MDIT�Remiss�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (rem) = Ad Euthymium de remissione peccatorum libri 2
	�MDIT�Thras�LA3��MDNM��LA1� (Thr) = Ad Thrasamundum libri 3

Gaud (GAU) = Gaudentius of Brescia

Gesta Pil (AP-E Pil) = Gesta Pilati

GregIl (GR-I) = Gregor of Illiberis�MDIT��MDNM�
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Cant�MDNM� (ct) = In Canticum Canticorum libri 5
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Tr�MDNM� (tr) = Tractatus Origenis

Greg (GR-M) = Gregorius Magnus
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Ezech�MDNM� (Ez) = Homiliae in Hiezechielem prophetam
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Reg�MDNM� (Rg) = In librum primum Regum expositionun libri 6

Hes (HES) = Hesychius of Jerusalem

Hi (HI) = Hieronymus
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Ad Iovin�MDNM� (Jov) = Adversus Iovinianum libri 2
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Agg�MDNM� (Agg) = Commentariorum in Aggaeum prophetam ad Paulam et 
              Eustochium liber
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Alterc Luc�MDNM� (alt) - Altercatio Luciferiani et orthodoxi
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Am�MDNM� (Am) = Commentariorum in Amos prophetam libri 3
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Chron Eus�MDNM� (chr) = Revision and continuation of Chronicum of Eusebius
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�C Pel�MDNM� (Pel) = Dialogi contra Pelagianos libri 3
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Ep�MDNM� (ep) = Epistulae 154
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Eph�MDNM� (Eph) = Commentariorum in epistulae ad Ephesios libri 3
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Ezech�MDNM� (Ez) = Commentariorum in Hiezechielem libri 14
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Gal�MDNM� (Gal) = Commentarii in epistulam ad Galatas libri 3
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Helv�MDNM� (Hel) = Adversos Helvidium de Mariae virginitate perpetua
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Hier�MDNM� (Jr) = In Hieremiam prophetam libri 6
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Is�MDNM� (Is) = Commentariorum in Esaiam libri 18
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Luc�MDNM� (Lc) = Origenis in Lucam homiliae 39
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Matth�MDNM� (Mt) = Commentariorum in Matheum libri 4
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�NAh�MDNM� (Na) = Commentariorum in Naum prophetam liber
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Or in Ezech hom�MDNM� (Ez h) = Origenis in Ezechielem homiliae 14
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Or in Is hom�MDNM� (Is h) = Origenis in Isaiam homiliae 9
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Ps hom�MDNM� (Ps h) = In Psalmos homiliae 73
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Quaest�MDNM� (q) = Hebraicae quaestiones in libro Geneseos
	�MDIT��LA3��LA1�Zach�MDNM� (Za) = Commentariorum in Zachariam prophetam ad Exsuperium 
              Tolosanum episcopum libri 3

Hil (HIL) = Hilarius of Poitiers
	�LA3��MDIT��LA1�Myst�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (my) = Tractatum mysteriorum
	�MDIT�Ps�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Ps) = Tractatus super Psalmos
	�LA3��MDIT��LA1�Trin�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (tri) = De Trinitate seu de fide libri 12

Hiln (HILn) = Quintus Iulius Hilarianus
	�MDIT�Curs�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (curs) = De cursu temporum
	�MDIT�Pasch�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (pa) = De ratione paschae et mensis

Hippl �MDIT�Chron�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (AN chr) = Hippolytus, Chronographus anni 354:15. Liber
                       generationis

IohCass (CAn) = Johannes Cassianus
	�MDIT�Conlat�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (co) = Conlationes Patrum 24
	�MDIT�Incarn�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Ne) = De incarnatione Domini contra Nestorium libri 7
	�MDIT�Inst�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (in) = De institutis coenobiorum et de octo principalium
              vitiorum remediis libri 12

Iren (IR) = Irenaeus of Lyon

Isid (IS) = Isidor of Sevilla
	�MDIT�Ex�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Ex) = Quaestiones in Vetus Testamentum seu Mysticorum
            expositiones sacramentorum
	�MDIT�Off�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (off) = De ecclesiasticis officiis libri 2

Lib geneal (AN gen)  LIber genealogus

Luc (LUC) = Lucifer of Cagliari
	�MDIT�Athan�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Ath) = De Athanasio liber 2
	�MDIT�Conven�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (con) = De non conveniendo cum haereticis
	�MDIT�Parc�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (par) = De non parcendo in Deum delinquentibus

MisMoz (M-M) = Missale  Mozarabicum

MisRom (M-R) = Missale Romanum

Nov (NO) = Novatianus
	�MDIT�Trin�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (tri) Novatiani de trinitate

Or (ORI) = Origenes
	�MDIT�Matth�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Mt) = with numbering of books and Sections = Matth�auus-Kom~mentar; the Tomoi extant in Greek and Latin revision.
	�MDIT�Matth�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (ser) cited only with pagination = Matth�auus-Kommentar; the translation of the Commentariorum series
	�MDIT�IReg�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (1 Rg) = Homiliae on the beginning of 1Rg

Pac (PAC) = Pacianus of Barcelona
	�MDIT�Bapt�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (s) = Sermo de baptismo

Pel (PEL) = Pelagius, Brite
	�MDIT�Ep et tr�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Casp 2-6) = Epistulae et tractatus a C.P.Caspari edita. Nos.2-6
	�MDIT�Indur�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (ind) = De induratione cordis Pharaonis

Philipp (PHI) = Philippus, Presbyter

Prisc (PRIS) = Priscillianus of Avila
  �MDIT�Tr�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (tr) = Tractatus 11

Prosp (PROS) = Prosper of Aquitanien
	�MDIT�Voc�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (voc) = De vocatione omnium gentium

PsAmbr (PS-AM) = Pseudo-Ambrosius
	�MDIT�Lex�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (lex) = Lex Dei sive Mosaicarum et Romanarum legum collatio
	�MDIT�Mans�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (man) = De XLII mansionibus filiorum Israel
	�MDIT�Paenit�MDNM� (pae) = De paenitentia

PaschSupp (AN sup) = Das Paschale der Supputatio Romana

Prisc (PRIS) = Priscillianus
	�MDIT�Tr�MDNM� (tr) = Tractatus

PsAmbr (PS-AM) = Pseudo-AMbrsosius
	�MDIT�Lex�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (lex) = Lex Dei sive Mosaicarum et Romanarum legum collatio
	�MDIT�Mans�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (man) = De XLII mansionibus filiorum Israel
	�MDIT�Paenit�MDNM� (pae) = De paenitentia

PsAug (PS-AU) = Pseudo-Augustinus
	�MDIT�Hypomn�MDNM� (hyp) = Hypomnesticon Augustini contra Pelagianos sive
                 Caelestianos haereticos
	�MDIT�Praedest�MDNM� (gr) = De praedestinatione et gratia
	�MDIT�Serm�MDNM� (s) = Sermones supposititii   
	�MDIT�SermCai�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (sCai) = Sermones ed, A.B.Caillau and B.Saint-Yves
	�MDIT�SermMai�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (sMai) = Sermones ed. A.Mai

PsCyp (PS-CY) = Pseudo-Cyprianus
	�MDIT�Mont�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (mont) = De montibus Sina et Sion
	�MDIT�Pasch�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (pa) = De pascha computus

PsEus (PS-EUS-C) = Pseudo-Eusebius of Caesarea

PsHi (PS-HI) = Pseudo-Hieronymus
	�MDIT�Ep�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (ep) Epistulae

PsMar (PS-MAR) = Pseudo-Marius Victorinus

PsNic (PS-NIC) = Pseudo-Nicetas
	�MDIT�Pasche�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (pa) = De pascha

PsPet (PS-PET) = Pseudo-Petrus Chrysologus
	�MDIT�Serm Liv�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (s Liv) = Sermones ed. F.Liverani

PsPhil (PS-PHo) = Pseudo-Philo, Liber Antiquitatum Biblicarum

PsVig (PS-VIG) = Pseudo-Vigilius of Thapsus
	�MDIT�Trin�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (tri) = De trinitate libri 12
	�MDIT�Varim�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Var) = Contra Varimadum Arianum

Quodv (QU) = Quodvultdeus of Carthage
	�LA3��MDIT��LA1�Haer�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (nae) = Adversus quinque haereses
	�MDIT�Prom�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (pro) = Liber promissionum et praedictorum Dei
	�MDIT�Serm symb�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (sy) = De symbolo sermones 3

Ruf (RUF) = Rufinus of Aquileja
	�MDIT�Adam�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Ad) = Libri Adamantii Origenis adversos haereticos 5
	�MDIT�Cant�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Ct) = Commentarius Origenis in Cant
	�MDIT�Eus�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Eus) = Eusebii Historia Ecclesiastica
	�MDIT�Ex�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Ex) = Origenis in Ex homiliae 13
	�MDIT�Gen�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Gn) = Origenis in Gen homiliae 16
	�MDIT�Ios�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Jos) = Origenis in librum Iesu Nave homiliae 26
	�MDIT�Num�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (nm) = Origenis in Num homiliae 28
	�MDIT�Or princ�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (pri) = Origenis libri 4 De principiis
	�MDIT�Pamph�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Pa) = Apologeticum Panphili martyris pro Origene
	�MDIT�Ps 36�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Ps) = Origenis in Ps XXXVI-XXXVIII homiliae 9
	�MDIT�Rom�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Rm) = Origenis Commentarius in Rom

SedScot (SED-S) = Sedulius Scottus
	�MDIT�Rom�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Rm) = Collectaneum in Apostolum

Spec (PS-AU spe) = Liber de divinis scripturis sive Speculum

Tert (TE) = Tertullianus
	�MDIT�Adv Herm�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Her) = Adversus Hermogenem
	�MDIT�Adv Iud�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (JUd) = Adversus Iudaeos
	�MDIT�Idol�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (id) = De idolatria
	�MDIT�Ieiunio�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (je) = De ieunio adversus psychicos
	�MDIT�Marc�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Marc) = Adversus Marcionem libri 5
	�MDIT�Monog�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (mon) = De Monogamia
	�MDIT�Prax�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Pra) = Adversus Praxean
	�MDIT�Scorp�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (sco) = Scorpiace

Tyc (TY) = Tyconius
	�MDIT�Reg�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (reg) = Liber regularum

Verec (VER) = Verecundus of Junca
	�MDIT�Cant�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (cant) = Commentarii super Cantica ecclesiastica

Zos (ZO) = Zosimus

	As in the case of Deut 32,1-41 so Exod 15,1-19 poses a peculiar problem, since this text also had an independent history outside of the Pentateuch 
tradition; it existed as well as an Ode at the end of the Psalter. Since this text was also used in the ecclesiastical liturgy, its developement was even further
complicated.

	For the Canticum (15,1-19) the following mss were also collated:

250 Paris, Biblioth�egque de l'Arsenal, 8407. IX. Century. Collated from
	F.F.Fleck, Anecdota maximam partem sacra in itineribus italicis et
  gallicis collecta. Lipsiae 1837.

300 Verona, Biblioteca Capitolare, I(1). V.-VI. Century. Collated from J.
  Blanchinus, Vindiciae Canonicarum Scripturarum Vulgatae Latinae
	 edi~t~ionis, seu vetera Sacrorum Bibliorum fragmenta juxta Graecam
	 Vulgatam, et Hexaplarem, Latinam Antiquam Italam, duplicemque
	 S. Eusebii Hieronymi translationem, nunc primum in lucem edita atque
	 illustrata, Romae 1740.

325 Leningrad, �Ouff. Staatsbibl., F.v.I.5. VIII. Century. Edition: A.
	Staerk, Les manuscrits latins du V�MDOL�e�MDNM��LA3��LA1� au XIII�MDOL�e�MDNM� si�egcle conserv�eas �ag la
	Biblioth�egque Imp�eariale de Saint-P�eatersbourg I, P�eatersbourg 1910, 325.

330 Rome, Bibl. Vat., Regin. lat.11. VIII. Century.

372 London, Brit. Mus., Cotton Vespasian A.1. Written cir. 700. Facs. 
	Edition: D.H.Wright, The Vespasian Psalter (Brit. Mus. Cotton Vespasian
	A.1). Early English Manuscripts in Facsimile, Vol.XIV. Copenhagen
	 1967.

398 Monte Cassino, Badia 559. Written cir. 1100.

400 Milan, Biblioteca Capitolare, 4�, 6. XI. Century. Edition: M.
	Magi~stretti, Manuale Ambrosianum, Milan 1905.

401 Milan, Biblioteca Capitolare, Beroldus Novus. XIII. Century. Edition:
	 as 400.

402 Milan, Bibl. Ambr., A. 189 sup. Written 1188. Edition: as 400.

410 Madrid, Bibl.Nacional, 10001. IX.-X. Century. Edition: PL 86,874-875.

419 Unknown ms. Edition: PL 86, 616-617.

460 Sinai, St. Catherine Monastery, Slavon. 5. X. Century.

	A text history of the liturgical texts of the Canticum Moyses must~ take 
  into consideration the following liturgical orders: the African order, the
  Veronese, the Milanese, the Roman, the Spanish (Mozarabic), �LA3��LA1�and the
  Gallican (or German) orders. The witnesses which were collated for these
  orders may be listed in the following Canticle-orders:
		a) African order = Cant�LA3��MDOL��LA1�Verec�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (Verecundus Iuncensis,
		   Commentariorum per Cantica ecclesiastica libri 9; cf. Frede,
		   Verzeichnis

		b) Veronese order = Cant�MDOL�R�MDNM��LA3��LA1�: cod.300

		c) Milanese order = Cant�MDOL�Mil�MDNM��LA3��LA1�: codd 400-402

		d) Roman order = Can�MDOL�Rom�MDNM��LA3��LA1�: codd 372 398

		e) Spanish order = Cant�MDOL�Moz�MDNM��LA3��LA1�: codd 410 411 419

		f) Gallican order = Cant�MDOL�Gall�MDNM��LA3��LA1�: codd 250 325 330

		A unique case is that of cod 460 = Cant�MDOL�Sin�MDNM��LA3��LA1�, which can not be assigned
     to any of the above orders.
 		Since the Odes are based on a La text, it should follow that patristic
     citations of the Canticum would be of La, even of those Fathers who
     normally cite Vulg.
		  The following list contains those patristic works which were collated
		for Exodus only for its Canticum :

		Ambr  �MDIT�Nab�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (AM Nab) = Ambrosius, De Nabuthae
		Cael (CAEL) = Pope Caelestinus I
		Eucher �MDIT�Form�MDNM��LA3��LA1� (EUCH int) = Eucherius Formulae spiritalis intelligentiae
		Faust �MDIT�Arian�MDNM� (FAUn Ar) = Faustinus. De Trinitate ad Augustam
	               Flacillam (De fide contra Arianos)
		Greg �MDIT�Iob�MDNM� (GR-M Jb) = Gregorius Magnus, Moralium libri sive
					 Expositio in librum Iob
		Hor �MDIT�Ep�MDNM� (HOR Ep in COL-AV) = Pope Hormisdas, Epistulae
		Ild �MDIT�Bapt�MDOL��MDNM� (ILD ba) = Ildefons of Toledo, Annotationes de cognitione
                baptismi
		JohM �MDIT�Nest�MDNM� (JO-M Ne) = Johannes Maxentius, Dialogi contra Nestori~-
  					   anos libri 2
		Jon �MDIT�Columb�MDOL��MDNM� (JON Col) = Jonas of Bobbio, Vitae S.Columbani abbatis
					discipulorumque eius libri 2	
		Leo �MDIT�Serm�MDOL��MDNM� (LEO s) = Pope Leo I, Sermones
		Nic �MDIT�Util�MDOL��MDNM� (NIC ut) = Nicetus of Remesiana, De utilitate hymnorum
		Pel �MDIT�Arrian�MDOL��MDNM� (PEL Ar) = Pelagius, Fragmentum tractatus contra
						Arrianos
		VictorV (VIC-V) = Victor of Vita					 		 

		For the Cantica in the Liturgy, cf H. Schneider.

						2. The Ethiopic Version = Aeth

		The collation of the Ethiopic Version for Exodus was based on O. Boyd's edition and the text of cod. M; for both of these see Genesis 43-44. For the dating of the Colophon in cod.P see Deuteronomium 31.

						3. The Arabic Version = Arab

		See Genesis 44-46.

						4. The Armenian Version = Arm

		The Old Armenian Version was collated from Zohrab's edition of the year 1805. For Exodus the collation of its hexaplaric signs was made by C. Cox, which signs were present in mss 26, 33,40,42,65,102,121,143,153, and 224�FN1�RP�   For a provisional Catalogue of mss cf M.E.Stone and C.Cox,  Guidelines for Editions of Armenian Biblical Texts, Bulletin of the International Organization for Septuagint and Cognate Studies 15 (1982), 51-57. I would especially want to thank C.E.Cox who graciously placed his own collations at my disposal and which were subsequently published in C.E.Cox, Hexaplaric Materials Preserved in the Armenian Version (Scholar Press 1986).�, and were noted under the designation Arm�MDOL�ms(s)�MDNM��LA3��LA1�. For further infor~mation see Genesis 446-47 and Numbers 26.�LA3�

						�LA1�4. The Coptic versions - Co

						  a) The Achmimic Version = Ach

  The remains found of the Achmimic Version consist of three papyrus leaves
in Paris, Bibl. Nat., no.135. Contents: 1,1-2,9 �LA3�������  4,2 �����-25 ��󜧜�  5,22 ���-7,4 ���.�LA1� Editions: P.Lacau, Textes coptes en dialec~tes akhmimique et sahidique, Bulletin d'Institut francais d'arch�eao~logie
orientale 8(1911), 43-64. Remains of this version (2,14  4,10  32,7-10 32) are noted in C. Schmidt, Der erste Clemensbrief in altkoptischer �Uuberset~zung, TU 32,1. Leipzig 1908.

						b) The Bohairic Version = Bo

		As in the case of Num and Deut (cf 31-32) two excellent ms�FN1�RP�  For the witness of other mss see the edition of the Bohairic text: Melvin K.H.Peters, A Critical Edition of the Coptic (Bohairic) Penta~teuch. vol.2, Exodus. Septuagint and Cognate Studies 22, Atlanta 1986.� for
the Bohairic text were collated:
		Paris, Bibl.Nat., Coptic 1. 1356.
     Rome, Bibl. Vat., Coptic 1. IX.-X. Century.

		Should these witnesses disagree, the Paris ms is designated as Bo�MDOL�A�MDNM��LA3��LA1�, and the Rome ms as Bo�MDOL�B�MDNM�. For the Bohairic Version in general see Genesis 47.

					c) The Fayyumic Version = Fa

London, Brit. Mus., Or 4717(11) presents parts of 15,2-19 in Fayyumic.
The text is much abbreviated; only 15,1 17 18 are complete. For the rest	only brief excerpts (liurgical incipits ?) of vss, 2 4 6 7 8  11 12 15 16 19 obtain. The text is published in W.E.Crum, Catalogue of the Coptic Mss in
the British Museum, No. 493. London 1905.

London, Brit. Mus., Or 5299(2) (= Crum No.494) has remnants of 15,1-16. which text has been published in W.E.Crum, Coptic Mss. Brought from the Fayyum by W.M.Flinders Petrie, Esq., D.C.L. together with a Papyrus in the Bodleian LIbrary ed. with Commentaries and Indices (London 1893). The language of the text is a peculiar mixture of Bohairic, Fayyumic and Sahidic, but mainly Bohairic; it is certainly not Fayyumic (or Middle
Egyptian), as A. Vaschalde, Le Mus�eaon 46 (1933), 306 maintains. The text has been collated under the designation Aeg.

						d) Sahidic Version = Sa

    
For the sahidic in general see Genesis 48.

The following mss were collated:

Sa�MDOL�1�MDNM� = G.Masp�earo, Fragments de la version th�eabaine de l'Ancien Testmaent. M�eam. pu. par les membres de la mission arch. fr. au Caire VI. fasc.1. Paris 1892. Contents: 2,13-23  16,27-36  19,24-24,18  31,12-34,32

Sa�MDOL�2�MDNM� = A. Ciasca, Sacrorum Bibliorum fragmenta copto-sahidica Musei Borgiani iussu et sumptibus S. Congregationis de Propaganda Fide edita. Tom.I, Rome 1885. Contents: 12,1-14  15,21-27  16,1-3  17,1-7  19,1-11  
26,24-36  20,1-9.

Sa�MDOL�3�MDNM� = R. Kasser, Papyrus Bodmer XVI. Exode I-XV,21 en sahidique. Geneva 1961. Contents: 1,1-15,21.

Sa�MDOL�4�MDNM� = L.Th.Lefort, Les Manuscrits Coptes de l'Universit�ea de Louvain. Louvain 1940. Contents: 1,1-6 19-22  2,4 5 6 18 19 23 24  3,12 13 15 16  
4,6 10 23-25 29 30  5,12 13 17 18. All the text pieces are fragmentary.

Sa�MDOL�5�MDNM� = J. Schleifer, Sahidische Bibelfragmente aus dem British Museum zu London II. Sitzungsb. d. Kais.Akad.d.Wiss. in Wien, philos.-hist.Kl. 164,6, Vienna 1911. British Museum, Or. 3579 A. Contents: 2,24 (fragm.)

Sa�MDOL�6�MDNM� = G. Masp�earo, �Eatudes �eagyptiennes, tome 1 (1883), 266-267. Contents: 
3,9-14 (fragm.).

Sa�MDOL�7�MDNM� = C. Wesseley, Griechische und koptische Texte theologischen Inhalts I.
Studien zur Palaeographie und Papyruskunde IX. Leipzig 1909. K.9875. Contents: 4,10-18.

Sa�MDOL�8�MDNM� = L.Stern, Zwei koptische Bibelfragmente. Ztschr. f. aegypt. Sprache 22(1884), 97-99. Contents: 15,11-17 19 (very fragmentary).

Sa�MDOL�9�MDNM� = S. De Ricci, The Zouche Sahidic Exodus Fragment, (Exodus XVI,6-XIX,11), from the Original Manuscript, Proc. of the Soc. of Biblical Archaeology 28(1906), 54-67. Contents: 16,6-19,11. This text was also collated in the �MDOL��MDNM�Apparatus of Sa�MDOL�2�MDNM�.

Sa�MDOL��LA4��LA1�10�MDNM� = P.Bellet, A Sahidic Fragment of Exodus (21,17-35/23,5-21, Walters
Art Gallery W. 739*), The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 40(1978), 37-40.
Contents: 21,17-35  23,5-21.

Sa�MDOL�11�MDNM� = W.C.Till, Sahidische Fragmente des Alten Testaments. Le Mus�eaon 50 (1937), 180. Contents: 23,15 20 (fragm.).

Sa�MDOL�12�MDNM� J. Schleifer, Bruchst�uucke d. sahidischen Bibel�uubersetzung. Sitzungs~berichte d. Kais. Akad. d.Wiss. in Wien, philos.-hist. Kl.170,I. Vienna 1912. London, Brit. Mus., Or. 3579A. Contents: 19,10-16.

						6. The Palastine-Syriac Version = Pal

	Pal was collated according to The Bible in the Syropalestinian Version,
ed. M.H.Goshen-Gottstein. Part I Pentateuch and Prophets, Jerusalem 1973.
This edition is the recollation of the following Lectionary texts. The list also contains a statement about the original publications.

	a) A.S.Lewis, Codex Climaci Rescriptus, Horae Semiticae VIII. Cambridge 1909. Contents: 4,14-18.

	b) idem, A Palestinian Syriac Lectionary, Studia Sinaitica VI, Cambridge 1897. Contents: 8,22-11,10.

	c) H. Duensing, Christlich-pal�austinisch-aram�auische Texte und Fragmente.
G�outtingen 1906. Contents: 12,28-52  14,18-27  15,7-20  16,2-10  16,32-17,6
19,7-17  26,3-12 26-36  38,4-18.

	d) F. Schulthess, Christlich-Pal�austische Fragmente, ZDMG 56(1954), 249s.  Contents: 15,1-5.

	e) M. Black, A Christian Palestinian Syriac Horologion, Cambridge 1954.
Contents: 15,5--19.

		f) G.H.Gwilliam, F.C.Burkitt, J.F.Stenning, Biblical and Patristic Relics of the Palestinian Syriac Literature, Anecdota Oxoniensia I,9. Oxford 1896. Contents: 28,1-12.

	g) F.Schulthess, Christlich-Pal�austinische Fragmente aus der Omajjaden-
Moschee zu Damaskus, Berlin 1905.Contents (very fragm.): 40,4 5 7-11 13-15.
		For the abbreviations Pal�MDOL��LA3���MDNM�  �LA1�and Pal�MDOL��LA3���MDNM��LA1��LA3� �LA1�see Goshen-Gottstein. For Pal in
general see Genesis 51.

						7. The Syro-hexaplaric Version = Syh

The folowing texts were collated:
	Syh�MDOL�L�MDNM� = P. de Lagarde, Bibliotheca Syriaca. G�outtingen 1892. Complete. In doubtful cases the basic ms of the edition was carefully compared.

Syh�MDOL�T�MDNM� = The Tur �LA3��LA1�Abdin Ms. Edition: A. V�ou�oubus, The Pentateuch in the Version of the Syro-Hexapla. A facsimile edition of a Midyat Ms. discovered 1964. Corp. Scr. Chr. Or. 369. Louvaine 1975. The following texts are absent due to leaf loss: 22,30�LA3� �� ��-23,26 ���  29,41�LA1� init-�LA3�30,18 �������.�LA1� Since many parts of the edition are difficult to read, especially the names of the younger translators,  a photograph of the Codex in the possession of the Unternehmen was used for control purposes.

	Syh is also one of the chief witnesses for the hexaplaric recension in Exodus. By its literal word for word reflection of the parent text in 
Syriac dress it is almost as valuable a witness as a Greek ms. Besides this it yields a multitude of hexaplaric signs, and is consequently indispen~sible for the reconsruction of the hexapla text.

	Often Greek words appear on the margins of Syh mss. Most of these have no text critical value, since they merely reflect the text underlying the Syh
text itself, and so were not noted in the edition. Only in exceptional cases, either in the case of proper nouns or in a few hexaplaric readings where their value for text criticism was apparent was clear were they noted. The recurrent �LA3������LA1� was not noted in this edition.

							III. Printed Editions

 	The most important are the three oldest Bibles: Aldina (Ald), Complutensis (Compl) and the Sixtina (Sixt). These have been fully collated for this edition. The principles which guide their citation are given below. Of the three, the Sixtina was reprinted frequently; for this edition, however, only the original text was used.

							1. Aldina (Ald)

	For the evaluation of Ald see Leviticus 24-25. In the Apparatus Ald is noted only when it deviates from the closely related ms. 68.

							2. Complutensis (Compl)

	The text of Compl in Exod 1-34 is based to a great extent on ms 108; Compl does, however, also contains variants which are witnessed by mss of the �MDIT�f�MDNM� group. Such are always noted in those mss when they deviate from ms 108. After 35,1 Compl supports a text which has been revised towards MT. but not one that agrees with the hexaplaric textform, but one showing great similarities to the form that F�MDOL�b�MDNM� represents (comp I 1 sub F).  Compl was thoroughly examined for Exod 35-40.�FN1�RP�For the text of Compl in this section, comp D. Fraenkel, Die Quellen der asterisierten Zus�autze im zweiten Tabernakelbericht Exodus 35-40, MSU XX (= Fst. R.Hanhart), 140-186.�
	The plus 18,(23)-(28) is also witnessed by Compl, though in a form which departs from that of all other Greek witnesses. It has taken from �MDIT�o�MDNM��LA3��LA1� only the introductory �LA3���� ������ ��� �� ������.�LA1� What follows is a translation of
39,16�LA3���-39,21�, �LA1�but set in the 2.Pers.sg.fut. By this translation 39,18b-39,21a is in essence the form which Compl gives in Exod 39, whereas the plus in Exod 28 is translated afresh.
	As to the singular readings of Compl as a whole it may be remarked that they are not based on a lost Greek parent text, but rather due to the editor of Compl; comp possibly some otherwise unwitnessed assimilations to MT.

							3. Sixtina (Sixt)

	Of the three old printed editions Sixt shows the closest dependence on a single ms. It mainly presents the text of cod.B; if B is corrected, it usually follows B�MDOL�c�MDNM�. Since little is known about sources other than B used in the restoration of its text Sixt is noted in the Apparatus whenever its text deviates from B, B* or B�MDOL�c�MDNM�. Mere orthographica which in certain cases are noted in the Apparatus, are not noted for Sixt.

							4. Grabe (Gr)

See Genesis 53.

							5. Holmes-Parsons (H.-P.)

See Genesis 54.

							6. Lagarde

		The text of Lagarde is one which he reconstructed for the Lucianic text of the books Genesis to Esther. The edition is not used for the Apparatus.

							7. Brooke-McLean (Br.-M.)

See Genesis 54-55. The edition Exodus-Leviticus appeared in 1909. Also in this edition a list of its variants from Br.-M. is presented in a Supplement.
The list, however, does not reflect those readings which Br.-M. includes which were taken over from H.-P.

							8. Rahlfs (Ra)

	Ra is a semi-critical edition of the Greek Old Testament whose text in Exodus is in essence based on a comparison of Uncials A and B.

�LA4�							�LA1��LA4��PT14��MDBO��LA1�B �MDBO�The Text History			�MDNM�

�PT12�  The text history has been thoroughly discussed in J.W.Wevers THGE. Only such information will be given here which is necessary for the use of this edition.

					I. Recensions and Textgroups in the LXX-tradition

						1. The �MDIT�O�MDNM� recension

�MDIT�O�MDNM� = G-58-72-376-426(to 20,1)-767
	58�LA3��LA1� = 58+72  376�LA3��LA1� = 376+426
oI = 64-381-618-708
	64�LA3��LA1� = 64+708  381�LA3��LA1� = 381+618
oII = 15-29-82-135-707
	15�LA3��LA1� = 15+82  29�LA3��LA1� = 29+707  82�LA3��LA1� = 82+707
�MDIT��MDNM�
	Hexaplaric signs are to be found basically only in G and in Syh; occasionally mss present a text which is not the �MDIT�O�MDNM�-text.

						The �MDIT�C�MDNM�-Group

�MDIT�C�MDNM� = 14-16-77-131-500-739
	14�LA3��LA1� = 14+16  77�LA3��LA1� = 77+131  500�LA3��LA1� = 500+739
�MDIT�cI�MDNM� = 57-73-78-413-550-552
	57�LA3��LA1� = 57+413  73�LA3��LA1� = 73+78  550�LA3��LA1� = 550+552
�MDIT�cII�MDNM� = 25-52-54(to 40,13)-126(to 25,5)-313-414-422-551-615-761
	52�LA3��LA1� = 52+615  313�LA3��LA1� = 313+761  414�LA3��LA1� = 414+551

	The �MDIT�C�MDNM��LA3��MDNM��>�LA1�-group represents a widely dispersed text type, which is found especially in the Catena mss. On the other hand, seven Catena mss do not belong to �MDIT�C�MDNM��LA3��MDNM��>�LA1�, namely the codices mixti 18, 646, ms 128 which belongs to the �MDIT�z�MDNM�-group, the �MDIT�oI�MDNM� ms 708, the �MDIT�oII�MDNM� ms. 135, and the �MDIT�s�MDNM� ms 730. Ms 424 represents from 26,14 a �MDIT�C�MDNM��LA3��MDNM��>�LA1� text type as well, though its text is so strongly abbreviated that it could hardly be reckoned part of �MDIT�C�MDNM��LA3��MDNM��>�LA1�, and  has rather been assigned to the codices mixti.

						3.The �MDIT�b�MDNM�-group

�MDIT�b�MDNM� = 19-108-118-314-537
	19�LA3��LA1� = 19+108  118�LA3��LA1� = 118+314

  19�LA3��LA1� often has readings separate from 118�LA3��LA1�-537, but usually the group is a closed one.

						4. The �MDIT�d�MDNM�-group

�MDIT�d�MDNM� = 44-106-107-125-610
	44�LA3��LA1� = 44+106  107�LA3��LA1� = 107+610  125�LA3��LA1� = 107+125

	On the character of the �MDIT�d�MDNM�-group as chief representative of the byzantine
text see THGN.

						5. The �MDIT�f�MDNM�-Group

�MDIT�f�MDNM� = 53-56-129-246-664
	53�LA3��LA1� = 53+664  56�LA3��LA1� = 56+246

  Ms 129 often deviates from the group.

						6. The �MDIT�n�MDNM�-Group

�MDIT�n�MDNM� = 54(from 40,13)-75-127(from 6,27)-458-628(to 13,1)
	75�LA3��LA1� = 75+458  127�LA3��LA1� = 127+75  458�LA3��LA1� = 458+127

						7. The �MDIT�s�MDNM�-Group

�MDIT�s�MDNM� = 30-85-127(to 6,26)-130(from 16,29)-321-343-344-346-730
	30�LA3��LA1� = 30+730  85�LA3��LA1� = 85+321  321�LA3��LA1� = 321+346  343�LA3��LA1� = 343+344

	The mss of the �MDIT�s�MDNM�-group contain numerous hexaplaric readings on the margins.

						8. The �MDIT�t�MDNM�-Group

�MDIT�t�MDNM� = 46(to 13,9)-74-76(from 28,39b)-84-134-270
	74�LA3��LA1� = 74+134

	As in the other books of the Pentateuch the �MDIT�t�MDNM�-group is very closely related to 
the �MDIT�d�MDNM�-group.

						9. The �MDIT�x�MDNM�-Group


�MDIT�x�MDNM� = 71-527(from 28,8)-619
	71�LA3��LA1� = 71+619

						10. The �MDIT�y�MDNM�-Group

�MDIT�y�MDNM� = 121-318-392-527(to 28,7)
	121�LA3��LA1� = 121+318  318�LA3��LA1� = 318+392

						11. The �MDIT�z�MDNM�-Group

�MDIT�z�MDNM� = 68-120-122-126(from 25,6)-128-407-628(from 13,2)-630
	68�LA3��LA1� = 68+122  120�LA3��LA1� = 120+407  128�LA3��LA1� = 128+630

	68�LA3��LA1�-120�LA3��LA1� often deviate in the first half of the book from the others, but
usually this is a closed group. The text of the �MDIT�z�MDNM�-group is also represented up to 
26,3, by ms 424, which is, however, included in the codices mixti. See sub no.2 above.

					II. The Later Greek Versions.

	For the character of the Second Apparatus see Genesis 59-60. As in the other books of the Pentateuch, the hexaplaric materials derive mainly from M, the �MDIT�s�MDNM�-mss, the Catenas as well as from Syh which is especially important for Exodus. A particularly fine source in Exodus as well is F�MDOL�b�MDNM�, mainly for anonymous readings.
  With respect to the origin of the hexaplaric notes the closest points of
contact are with the Catena tradition on the one hand, and with the Syh on
the other. F�MDOL�b�MDNM� on the whole is limited to the tradition of the �LA3���LA1� readings.
That this was a systematic tendency becomes particularly apparent from such
cases where other witnesses showed more versions, but F�MDOL�b�MDNM� omits the �LA3���LA1� or the �LA3���LA1� readings, and gives only the �LA3���LA1� ones. Furthermore numerous cases obtain within the materials peculiar to F�MDOL�b�MDNM� which come from �LA3���LA1� itself or from a post-�LA3���LA1� tradition. Quite striking points of contact appear with a Modern Greek Jewish version of the Pentateuch in Hebrew letters which was published in Constan~tinople in 1547. It was republished in Greek letters by D.C.Hesselink in 1897.�FN1�RP�  A relation between this translation and F�MDOL�b�MDNM� was already proven by D.S.Blondheim, Les Parlers Jud�eao-Romans and La Vetus Latina, Paris 1925, p.161.�
	The edition of Hesselink was given the designation of Pent in Apparatus II. The source critical value of Pent lies in the recognition that a large portion of the anonymous readings in F�MDOL�b�MDNM� actually belong to a Jewish transla~tion tradition, though not in the establishment of an immediate dependance which would be rather unlikely, but rather showing that F�MDOL�b�MDNM� readings simply relate to a level linguistically older than Modern Greek. Beyond this it is evident that the fragmentary tradition of F�MDOL�b�MDNM� can offer little more than a
lexical comparison. Furthermore, the exact grammatical form often remains unclear, since the ms tends to omit such matters as parts of words such as�MDIT� �MDNM�suffixes and other elements. Sometimes such abbreviations can be solved by parallel traditions, either within F�MDOL�b�MDNM� itself or through other mss.  Presumably some solutions of these late Hellenistic forms may be found in the works  of Du Cange and of Kriara, for which see Literature and Collec~tions below.
	A citation of Pent does not imply the establishment of a exact literal agreement between Pent and F�MDOL�b�MDNM�, which on linguistic grounds would be most unlikely, but merely an 
indication that both sources were using the same lexical base. With the realization of this limitation, the notations of Pent�MDIT� �MDNM�are to be understood as follows:

= Pent means that the witnessed manner of translation reading in F�MDUD�b�MDNM� is also to 
be found at the same place in Pent. This appears in 100 cases.
cf Pent means that the witnessed manner of translation reading in F�MDOL�b�MDNM� is also 
to be found somewhere in Pent.

	Once again Cod M with 267 cases is a dependable source for hexaplaric mate~rial. The ms also contains a large number of Scholia and Commentary fragments, probably from the hands of notewriters in majuscule letters.
These fragments are mostly found in Exodus catenas. Such fragments are desig~nated, on the analogy of the notation of Catenas, as M�MDOL�comm�MDNM�; cf 28,36.
	Unlike the case of Lev no instances of a relation between these fragments and the Samaritan Targum occur; cf Lev 30 and 31; rather the source of these in Exodus is throughout hexaplaric in origin. The closely related ms 416 which is extant only from 32,17 contains but 24 cases.
	The Catena mss were also fully excerpted for Exodus. With regard to the catena ms 135 of the �MDIT�oII�MDNM�-group (70 cases), 730 of the �MDIT�s�MDNM�-group (64), the codd mixti ms 18 (98) and ms 646 (88), it is again evident that the hexaplaric notes throughout came from the Catena-tradition. This is also valid for ms 628 of the �MDIT�z�MDNM�-group (6 cases) which yields catena only in ch.15. But as in Lev notes from ms 424 were not cited. As in the other editions wherever the source of a �MDOL�comm�MDNM� reading could be verified in an edition, the relevant Church Father is named. The total number of Catena readings is 244.
	Almost half, 128 in fact, of the noted Catena cases should not be reckoned as being part of the real Catena tradition; these are rather part of the separate materials which some �MDIT�cI�MDNM� mss, especially 57�LA3��LA1�, often accompanied by 550�LA3��LA1�, have taken over from the fragment-tradition of the �MDIT�s�MDNM�-Group. These are throughtout marginal readings. This is particularly clarified by the frequent doubly attested cases, in which 57�LA3��LA1�-550�LA3��LA1� present specific readings both in the Catena form and also in the form of �MDIT�s�MDNM� readings. cf 4,10 13,13, etc. Of the remaining 116 general Catena cases, 35 are attested only on margins, either as 
independent exegetical-philological fragment, or within a commentary. Also the usual Catena cases are actually taken from an excerpt tradition common to both M and �MDIT�s�MDNM�. Other materials unique to �MDIT�C�MDNM��LA3��MDNM��>�LA1� cannot be ordered within the hexaplaric tradition with certainty; 
in any event readings which are simply glosses are not recorded in the edition. 
   As in the other volumes of the Pentateuch the mss of the �MDIT�O�MDNM��LA3��LA1��>-group yield relatively few readings of the later versions. Similarly again in Exod Syh in contrast to the �MDIT�O�MDNM��LA3��LA1��> mss testifies to numerous cases (679 in fact). In any event only 346 cases, thus more than half, are not marginal readings, but are simply asterisked materials witin the text, though anonymous. These readings are duely recorded in the first apparatus because the asterisk shows that such readings belong to the LXX tradition. For others the recording is placed in the second Apparatus, in any event without asterisk though with names of source, since such readings are to be defined as part of the non-LXX tradition. The symbol �	 at the end of the witness(es) indicates the fact of double notation.
	Syh witnesses to an unusually large number of these plusses with the otherwise infrequently occurring source �LA3�i e��LA1��LA3�. �LA1�But particularly in these cases the two Syh-mss are often divided in their attributions, i.e. the one may attribute a reading to  �MDIT��LA3��MDNM��LA1�Ayin (= �LA3�i e��LA1��LA3��LA1�)�LA3� �LA1�and the other ms to �MDIT�gamma�MDNM� (= �LA3��� ��LA1��LA3��LA1�). Since the two attributions were originally in Estrangelo script in which the two letters are very similar, in the edition �LA3�i e��LA1��LA3��LA1� readings are only accepted if the �LA3��LA1�Ayin is written in Serta script. This distinction is also valid for the London ms which was the basis for Syh�MDOL�L�MDNM�, so that it is possible for contradictory notes to appear in our edition.
	From the Greek �MDIT�O�MDNM��LA3��LA1��> witnesses the most instances come from ms 64 with 74 cases. A few further readings obtain in this ms, of which only the remains of letters remain due to the fact that the pages were trimmed on the edges, and thus letters have been lost. Noticeably the amount of hexaplaric material is unevenly distributed, since only 36 
fragments obtain in the first three chapters, another 24 in 7,19-19,22, In the last 30 
chapters only 14 cases appear, and none between 4,1 and 7,18.  The large number of these hexaplaric materials in the opening chapters shows that a tradition of hexaplaric materi~als was originally an equally rich source for the fragmentary remains of the three later translators as Syh; on the other hand, the ms also illustrates the process of erasure of the excerpt tradition.
	Ms 707 follows with 72 cases, 58-376 considerably less with 28 and 13 resp., and finally 708 with only 1 case.
   As in the other books of the Pentateuch the mss of the �MDIT�s�MDNM�-group preserve numerous 
fragments of the later translators; of these ms 344 has the most cases, 349, followed by 85 with 298 and 321 with 258.
	Since ms 130 is only an �MDIT�s�MDNM� witness from 16,29 it has only 176 cases; similarly there are only 50 cases in ms 127, and 22, in 346. Independent of the quantitative differences in the witnesses, all share in the same excerpt-tradition. Quite different is the case of ms 343, in which not only are all cases anonymously given but the 46 cases often show special materials whose charac~ter is not always definable, and seems to show some relation to the F�MDOL�b�MDNM� tradition, and in one case the notation = Pent might even be made.
	The remaining LXX-tradition contains only a small number of hexaplaric fragments, thus ms F has only 8 cases, while for F�MDOL�a�MDNM� only one instance is attested. Of special interest, however, are the 53 cases in the �MDIT�b�MDNM� ms 108, which is clearly related to the Syh tradition to such an extant that in one case only ms 108 has preserved the Greek text. It also appears that the excerpt tradition had certain contacts with F�MDOL�b�MDNM�, The 35 cases in the �MDIT�f�MDNM� ms 56
follow the tradition of F�MDOL�b�MDNM�, and  in 8 cases = Pent, and in one case cf Pent. From the �MDIT�d�MDNM�-group ms 106 is represented only once; �MDIT��MDNM�from �MDIT�n�MDNM� 75 has 15 cases, 458 only 4. From �MDIT�z�MDNM� the catena-like ms 128 has 4, and 630 has only one case.
	Among the Church Fathers hexaplaric notes are only sporadically attested. The most (27) are found in Procop, followed by 11 in Tht, 8 in Hi, 4 in Eus, and 1 each in Max and Or.
	Except for the peculiarities of F�MDOL�b�MDNM� and Syh Exod follows the pattern with respect to the tradition of the hexaplaric notes common to the Pentateuch: M as well as the �MDIT�s�MDNM�-group with the exception of 343 extract clearly from the excerpt tradition; wherein these differentiate is in that M first of all presents lexical peculiarities, whereas the �MDIT�s�MDNM�-group, especially 344, often documents different syntactic distinctions among �MDIT�o�MDNM��LA3��LA1� �LA3���LA1� �LA3���LA1� and �LA3���LA1�. The M and �MDIT�s�MDNM� 
common tradition is in general also tied to the Catena tradition. A second large line of fragment-tradition is by contrast represented by Syh. All the other witnesses somehow fit into the categories described above.
	For this edition Field has also been fully compared; similarly Montfaucon was 
consulted, but in view of the numerous demonstrable errors in it, its remaining instances unless further ms evidence obtained were not noted in the edition.


					�PT14� �MDBO�C Re this Edition
�MDNM��PT12�
	The general arrangement of the Genesis edition was retained also for Exod. The changes which were proposed over against former volumes of the G�outtinger Septuaginta are partially repeated below.

						1. The Introduction

	The introduction contains only such information as are necessary for the users of this edition. An extensive discussion, particularly of the text history is to be found in THGE. Deviations from Br.-M. are listed once again in an appendix, since though these have their importance are not strictly necessary for the reader.
	As in Genesis the Orthographica  and Grammatica discussion is placed in a Supp~lement. It is, however, dealing with fewer orthographic or grammatical matters, and rather concentrates on those that might then aid in understanding some passage. In general the observations in Supplement I in Genesis are also valid for Exodus. In the preparation of the edition the editor found it necessary to distinguish carefully between actual variants and such which are merely orthographic in nature; only the former were noted in Apparatus I. Accordingly such itacistic variants as of the transcription �LA3�ɤ�LA1� were not noted. Only with proper nouns do all variants appear in the Apparatus.

						2. The Creitical Text

	As in the Genesis edition proper nouns are given in full, i.e. with accents and when necessary with spiritus asper or spiritus lenis. The principles which the editor followed for the Genesis edition for the establishment of the critical text have not changed. The reader is therefore referred to Genesis 62-62.
		In order to make the notation of the hexaplaric form of the text clear for the reader, the longer hexaplaric plusses are printed within the critical text itself. Through certain external changes it becomes clear that this text is not the critical text, but deals with variants to that text: a) by indentation and the use of smaller type fonts one realizes that the text is clearly different, and b) all the verse numbers are placed in square brackets (= the numbers of MT), since this text is not found in Exod. The insertion MT 28,23-28 is similarly presented after Exod 28,22. 

						3. The List of Sources

	Between the text and Apparatus I all the manuscript and versional sources used are listed in the same order as that used in the apparatuses. N.b. also the following: Any 
witness which is fragmentary is placed in parentheses, e.g. (835). Should the text of a 
witness begin on a particular page the text is named with a hyphen following, e.g. (120-); if such a text ends on a page, the hyphen precedes the name, e.g. (-120). 
	Should a particular text lack the text of a page, e.g. because of a lost leaf, this is noted for ms 120 by �MDIT�z�MDOL�-120�MDNM�. What this means is that all the mss belonging to the �MDIT�z�MDNM�-group have the page's text except for ms 120 (which belongs to �MDIT�z�MDNM�).
	The abbreviation al (for alia manuscripta) means mss which have not been assigned to any text group, i.e. the so-called codices mixti as well as mss too fragmentary to admit of a group assignment. The expression verss refers to all the versions which are extant in full. Versions which are only partially extant, such as Pal, are named at the end of the list.


						4. Apparatus I

	The support for a variant is always given in a particular order: a) the uncial texts in alphabetic order, b) the papyri in numerical order, c) the witnesses of the �MDIT�O�MDNM��LA3��LA1��> mss, d) the witnesses of the �MDIT�C�MDNM��LA3��MDNM��>�LA1� mss, e) other text-groups in alphabetic order, f) the codices mixti, g) the rest of the Greek witnesses in the following order: N.T. witnesses�FN1�RP� Cited according to Nestle-Aland, Novum Testamentum Graece. 25. ed., London (Reprint Stuttgart 1971).�, Phil, followed by other Greek Fathers in alphabetic order, h) the Latin texts in numerical order, followed by the Latin Fathers in alpha~betic order. The Latin witnesses (except for the separate readings of the Fathers) are always introduced by the raised �MDOL�Lat�MDNM�, i) the other versions in alphabetic order, and j) other witnesses or Commentaries.
		Over against the Genesis edition only the citation of the Latin Fathers has changed. No longer used are the designation of the various text types as La�MDOL�K�MDNM�, La�MDOL�M�MDNM�, etc., while the designaton La can only be used in Exod if all the Latin witnesses are in agreement (cf 
Section A II 1. supra). This change is necessary since no critical text edition of the Vetus Latina for Exod has appeared, and therefore no certain basis for the differentiation of the Old Latin text according to such text types is given (cf Section A II 1, supra). Because of this it was also necessary to place the Latin Fathers immediately after the Latin mss. For the change in the notation which the Pentateuch editions have in common over against the other G�outtingen Septuaginta editions see Genesis 64.
  In the various volumes of the Pentateuch the formal agreement of variants with MT is carefully noted. Whenever a variant is acknowledged as = MT, it means that MT includes MT, Sam, Tar�MDOL�O�MDNM� and Tar�MDOL�P�MDNM�. When this is not the case, the individual agreements are given. For Exodus the editor was also given access to copies of various Qumran mss,�FN1�RP� For the sharing of their copies I must express my gratitude, namely, to J. Sanderson of Princeton (Q�MDOL�m�MDNM�), E. Ulrich of the University of Notre Dame (Q�MDOL�l�MDNM�), and J.Strugnell of Harvard University (Q�MDOL�364�MDNM� and Q�MDOL�365�MDNM�), especially since it concerns copies
still in the course of preliminary investigations, and so not
yet in the final stage of the later editions of these mss. This
means that any reference to these mss in the edition is neccessarily
provisional.� which have been collated under the following sigla: Q�MDOL�l�MDNM� = 4Q paleoExod�MDOL�l�MDNM�,  Q�MDOL�m�MDNM� = 4Q paleoExod�MDOL�m�MDNM�, Q�MDOL�364�MDNM� = 4Q 364, Q�MDOL�365�MDNM� = 4Q 365. The mss in paleohebrew script are particularly interesting since they correspond almost completely to Sam.

						5. The �MDIT�O�MDNM�-Text in chh. 36-39

	The text 36,8-39,23 of Exod diverges very strongly both in extent and order 
from MT. Only the hexaplaric text has a text which has a text revised according to
MT; this text is represented by the witnesses F�MDOL�b�MDNM� G-58-72-376-767 Aeth�MDOL�C�MDNM� Arab Arm
Syh = Compl. The extensive differences between the �MDIT�O�MDNM� text and LXX has made it 
advisable to print the hexaplaric text separately, as for example Br-M. in their
edition did�FN1�RP�  Cf "Appendix to Exodus".�. Here, however, this pattern was not followed,  since it was felt
that only an integration of the �MDIT�O�MDNM� text in the Apparatus could clarify the place 
and importance of the hexaplaric text in the text history. The differences both in 
extent and ordering between MT and the �MDIT�O�MDNM�-text revision based on it on the one 
hand and the LXX on the other becomes clear in the contrasting tables of the two 
forms,  MT and Exod.
�PG�
             A)                                    B)

MT			LXX                     LXX             MT

36,8a			= 36,8a		36,8-40	= 39,1-31	
36,8b-9		= 37,1-2		37,1-2	= 36,8b-9
36,10-31	not in LXX		37,3-6	= 36,35-38
36,35-38	= 37,3-6		37,7-21	= 38,9-23
37,1-10a	=38,1-11		38,1-3	= 37,1-3
37,10b-15	not in LXX		38,4-9	= 37,5-11
37,16-17a	38,12-17		38,10	= 37,13
37,17b-28	not in LXX		38,11-17	= 37,15-23
37,29			= 38,25		38,12-20	not in MT
38,1-7		38,22-24		38,21	= 38,20
38,8			= 38,26		38,22-24	= 38,1-5
38,9-23		= 37,7-21		38,25	= 37,29
38,24-31	= 39,1-10a	38,26	= 38,8
39,1			= 39,13		38,27	= 40,30-32
39,2-31		= 36,9-40		39,1-8	= 38,24-30a
39,32			= 39,10b-12	39,9	= 38,31
39,33			= 39,14		39,10-11	= 38,30b 39,32
39,34			not in LXX		39,12	not in MT
39,35			39,15-16a		39,13	= 39,1
39,36			= 39,18		39,14-15	= 39,33 35
39,37-38	= 39,16a-17	39,16-17	= 39,38 37
39,39			not in LXX		39,18	= 39,16
39,40			= 39,20-21	39,19	= 39,41
39,41			= 39,19		39,20-21	= 39,40 34 40
39,42-43	= 39,22-23	39,22=23	= 39,42-43

	In general the notation of the hexaplaric text in the Apparatus will not be
problematic to the reader. This is also true for the longer pieces of �MDIT�O�MDNM�-text which appear
within the critical text in smaller type and are introduced by the numeration
in square brackets, so that the application of the variants to the correct insertions
will be immediately apparent.  	
	A notation problem in connection with the proper placing of the hexaplaric text in the
Apparatus appeared only in the case of the omission of larger text blocks by individual witnesses, since the notation of a textual omission normally presupposes a comparable
text order. It is precisely in this that the witnesses of the �MDIT�O�MDNM�-text differ over against 
Exod, since the LXX text abbreviates over against MT and is essentially differently
ordered. This difficulty �MDNM�especially pertains to the four mss, F�MDOL�b G-58-72�MDNM�, each of 
which have various omissions.
	As a solution did not appear for the conversion of an omission in �MDIT�O�MDNM� in the 
corresponding Exod text forthwith, the notation for the actual information
could only be given in indirect fashion, namely that an actual piece of text had
fallen out. It would indeed be unpardonable to present variants in the Apparatus
in such a fashion that the character of the variant would not be evident. After all,
omissions should be so noted on the basic presupposition that a block of text is
absent. This can only be clearly stated by designating the end of the omission
according to the MT order which is the order followed by the hexaplaric text.
Thus, e.g. in 38,9 the omission in ms 72 is given as follows: om �LA3�������-�� 38,18 
����������.�LA1� Since Exod 38,9 = MT 37,10 the notice is to be understood that the
ms omits MT 37,10-MT 38,28, thus a large block of hexaplaric text.
   On the basis of the above tables what ms 72 omits over against Exod are the
following verses: 38,10-11 [37,10-15] 38,12-17 [37,17b-28] 38,25 22-24 26 37,7-16.
In positive terms it means that ms 72 has the following verses of chh.36-39:
36,1-40 [36,8b-34] 37,3-6 16-38,9 39,2-23
	To place this kind of detailed information in the Apparatus would make this overly complicated, without giving the reader a better insight into the basic circumstance
involved. In view of this it seemed wise to give an exact account of the content of
the four mss involved, as well as to put cf praef at the end of the notation of
such omissions. Also helpful to the reader is the fact that the source list 
correctly indicates the content of the four mss. 
	F�MDOL�b�MDNM� has the following text: MT 36,3-MT 39,19 (39,9 �LA3������ 1�LA1���LA3� -16 �������LA1�[�LA3����LA1� is absentdue to leaf loss). The equivalent text in the order of Exod would be: 36,3-16 24-27
[36,8-34] 37,3-38,11 [37,10b-15] 38,12-13 [37,17b-28] 38,22-26 39,1-10a 13.
	In G only the following is extant: MT 36,35-MT 37,21  MT 38,24-MT 39,21 
MT 39,37-fin libri. The equivalent text in Exod would be: 36,8b-29  37,3-6  38,1-11 
[37,10b-15] 38,12-17 [37,17b-21] 39,1-10 13 16-17 19-fin libri.
	For ms 58 MT 39,40-MT 40,17 is absent due to leaf loss. The equivalent in 
Exod would be: Exod 39,19 20a 22-40,17.

						6, Apparatus II

	The basic principles underlying the second Apparatus were discussed under B II. above. Unless it is otherwise indicated, the second Apparatus always deals with marginal readings. Readings from the later translators which derive from the Commentary texts within the Catena mss are designated with a superscript �MDOL�comm�MDNM� (e.g. 77�MDOL�comm�MDNM�). If the Commentary is specifically mentioned this is shown by adding the superscript name (e.g. 77�MDOL�comm Tht�MDNM�). Readings within the catena which are not in the Commentary are recognized by a superscript �MDOL�cat�MDNM� (e.g. 77�MDOL�cat�MDNM�).

					�PT14��MDBO�D Signs and Abbreviations

�MDNM��PT8�-		used to indicate mss with a group, for ex. 44-125-610 or �MDOL�Lat�MDNM�codd
		94-96 = �MDOL�Lat�MDNM� codd 94 95 96

�MDIT�C�MDOL�-25�MDNM�		Mss deviating from a group are shown by a raised minus  
 		sign, so �MDIT�C�MDOL�-25�MDNM� means all of �MDIT�C�MDNM� except 25. Similarly Aeth�MDOL�-P�MDNM�
		means all the Aeth texts except P.		 

�MDIT�C�MDNM��MDOL�(-25)�MDNM�    indicates that ms 25 has a larger omission than the other
		members of �MDIT�C�MDNM�. E.g. �MDIT�d�MDOL�(125)�MDNM� in Exod 7,19 (om �LA3���� e�⤜�� �ˣ� 125�LA1�)�LA3�

�MDOL��LA1�*�MDNM��LA3��MDNM��LA1�		= the original reading of a ms.�LA3�

�MDOL��LA1�c�MDNM�	�LA3�	�LA1�= later corrections�LA3�

�LA3��LA1��MDOL�(*)�MDNM��LA1��MDNM��LA3�, �LA1��MDOL�(c)�MDNM��LA1� means that within a larger omission the ms does not have the
         original or corrected variant (e.g. 77�MDOL�(c)�MDNM�


�MDOL�c pr m�MDNM� (c pr m)	= a correction of the first hand.

�MDOL�c1�MDNM� 		=  the first corrector

�MDOL�c2�MDNM�		= the second corrector

�MDOL�s�MDNM�		refers to the suppletor as for ex. Bs in Gen1,1-46,28, or 
		the restorer as Bs in Gen 50,15. The raised s cannot
		contrast with *. When s refers to a suppletor such raised
		signs as *,c,c pr m can be added. Ex. Bs*

�MDOL�txt	�MDNM�	means a textual reading in mss		

�MDOL�mg�MDNM�		= a marginal reading in mss

�MDOL�(mg)�MDNM�	means that a marginal reading does not contrast with a reading in
		text, since the txt has a larger omission, e.g. 77(mg)

txt*,txt�MDOL�c�MDNM�,mg*,mgc are used if a txt- or margin- shows a correction

�MDOL�te�MDNM�		refers to readings in the text of editions

�MDOL�ap�MDNM�		refers to readings (variants) in the apparatus of editions

�MDOL�cat�MDNM�(in App.2)   means the reading comes from the Catena of a Catena ms

�MDOL�comm�MDNM��MDNM�(in App.2)  means the reading from Catena attributed to a particular
		Church Father, for ex 77�MDOL�comm�MDNM�

vid		means the reading is uncertain, for ex 31(vid)

(?)		refers to uncertain words or symbols

�MDOL�ms(s)�MDNM�		refers to codex(-ices) of the Vulgate

�MDOL�Lat�MDNM�		introduces series of Latin Fathers

�MDOL��]��MDNM�		indicates line change

�MDOL��|3�MDNM�		indicates  a page or column change

�MDNM��MDOL��hD�MDNM�		a dot under a letter means that the letter cannot be read			with certainty                   

+, add		indicates a plus

>, om		indicates an omission

�		indicates omission due to homoioteleuton

(�LA3���LA1�)		means that the enclosed letter is omitted in various mss, 
		for ex �LA3������LA1�(�LA3���LA1�)

[...]		shows that three letters cannot be read in a ms.

[...16...] means that in ms 16 letters cannot be read

�LA3�...�LA1�]�LA0��LA3���, ���LA1�[�LA3�...	�LA1�means that only �LA3����LA1� can be read in a ms

[�LA3���LA1�]�LA0��LA3����LA1�		means that �LA3���LA1� is conjectured

<>		means a symbol added contrary to the tradition

{}			means a symbol omitted contary to the tradition

�#X,�		are asterisk and obelus

�/		means metobelus

		refers to Apparatus II

		refers to Syh in Apparatus I

MT		= the Masoretic text

MT�MDOL�L�MDNM�	= the text of BHS

Q�MDOL�l�MDNM�		= the text of Qomran 4Q paleoExod�MDOL�l�MDNM�

Q�MDOL�m�MDNM�		= the text of Qumran 4Q paleoExod�MDOL�m�MDNM�

Q�MDOL�364�MDNM� �MDOL�365�MDNM� = the texts of Qumran mss 4Q 364 and 365

absc	= abscissus
App		= apparatus
cf		= confer
cod(d)	= codex (-dices)
corr		= correctura
c var	=	cum variis (lectionibus)
del	 	= deletus
dess		= desunt	
dittogr	= dittographia
ed(d)	= editio (-tiones)
ex corr	= correctura
Exod	= textus criticus
ex par	= ex parallelis locis
fin		- finis
hab		= habe(n)t
haplogr  = haplolographia
homoiar  = homoiarcton
inc 		= incertus
init		= initium
litt		= littera(e)
mend	= mendose
metob	= metobelus
ms(s)	= manuscriptum (-ta)
mutil	= mutilatum
omn codd = omnes codices
pap		= papyrus
pl		= plures
plur		= pluraliter
pr		= praemittit (-tunt)
praec	praecedens (re text reference within a verse)
praef	= praefatio
pr m	= prima manus
ras		= rasura
relict	= relictus
rell		= reliqui
rescr	= rescriptus
s		= sine
s ind	= sine indice
s nom	= sine nomine
s ss		= sequens, sequentes (for pages)
scr		= scripsit (-serunt)
sed hab	= sed habe(n)t
sing		= singulariter
spat		= spatium
sq	 	= sequens (re text reference within a verse)
sup lin 	= supra lineam
sup ras	= supra rasuram
superscr = superscripsit
tr		= transposuit (-suerunt)
ult		= ultimus
vers(s)	= versio (-ones)
vid		= ut videtur  


�PT12�					Recensions and Ms-Groups

�MDIT�O�MDNM�	= G-58-72-376-426(to 20,1)-767
	58�LA3��LA1� = 58+72  376�LA3��LA1� = 376+426
�MDIT�oI�MDNM� = 64-381-618-708
	64�LA3��LA1� = 64+708  381�LA3��LA1� = 381+618
�MDIT�oII�MDNM� = 15-29-82-135-707
	15�LA3��LA1� = 15+82  29�LA3��LA1� = 29+707  82�LA3��LA1� = 82+707
�MDIT�O�MDNM��LA3��LA1��> = �MDIT�O�MDNM� + �MDIT�oI�MDNM� + �MDIT�oII�MDNM�  �MDIT�O�MDNM��LA3��LA1� = �MDIT�O�MDNM� + �MDIT�oI�MDNM�  �MDIT�O�MDNM��LA3� �LA1�= �MDIT�O�MDNM� + �MDIT�oII�MDNM�  �MDIT�oI�MDNM��LA3��LA1� = �MDIT�oI�MDNM� + �MDIT�oII�MDNM�

�MDIT�C�MDNM� = 14-16-77-131-500-739
	14�LA3��LA1� = 14+16  77�LA3��LA1� = 77+131  500�LA3��LA1� = 500+739
�MDIT�cI�MDNM� = 57-73-78-413-550-552
	57�LA3��LA1� = 57+413  73�LA3��LA1� = 73+78  550�LA3��LA1� = 550+552
�MDIT�cII�MDNM� = 25-52-54(to 40,13)-126(to 25,5)-313-414-422-551-615-761
	52�LA3��LA1� = 52+615  313�LA3��LA1� = 313+761  414�LA3��LA1� = 414+551
�MDIT�C�MDNM��LA3��MDNM��>�LA1� = �MDIT�C�MDNM� + �MDIT�cI�MDNM� + �MDIT�cII�MDNM�  �MDIT�C�MDNM��LA3��LA1� = �MDIT�C �MDNM�+�MDIT� cI�MDNM�  �MDIT�C�MDNM��LA3� �LA1�= �MDIT�C �MDNM�+�MDIT� cII�MDNM�  �MDIT�cI�MDNM��LA3��LA1� = �MDIT�cI�MDNM� +�MDIT� cII�MDNM�

�MDIT�b�MDNM� = 19-108-118-314-537
	19�LA3��LA1� = 19+108  118�LA3��LA1� = 118+314

�MDIT�d�MDNM� = 44-106-107-125-610
	44�LA3��LA1� = 44+106  107�LA3��LA1� = 107+610  125�LA3��LA1� = 107+125

�MDIT�f�MDNM� = 53-56-129-246-664
	53�LA3��LA1� = 53+664  56�LA3��LA1� = 56+246

�MDIT�n�MDNM� = 54(from 40,13)-75-127(from 6,27)-458-628(to 13,1)
	75�LA3��LA1� = 75+458  127�LA3��LA1� = 127+75  458�LA3��LA1� = 458+127

�MDIT�s�MDNM� = 30-85-127(to 6,26)-130(from 16,29)-321-343-344-346-730
	30�LA3��LA1� = 30+730  85�LA3��LA1� = 85+321  321�LA3��LA1� = 321+346  343�LA3��LA1� = 343+344

�MDIT�t�MDNM� = 46(to 13,9)-74-76(from 28,39b)-84-134-270
	74�LA3��LA1� = 74+134

�MDIT�x�MDNM� = 71-527*from 28,8)-619
	71�LA3��LA1� = 71+619

�MDIT�y�MDNM� = 121-318-392-527(to 28,7)
    121�LA3��LA1� = 121+318  318�LA3��LA1�=318+392

�MDIT�z�MDNM� = 68-120-122-126(from 25,6)-128-407-628(from 13,2)-630
	68�LA3��LA1� = 68+122  120�LA3��LA1� = 120+407  128�LA3��LA1� = 128+630

Codices mixti: 18 46(from 13,9) 55 59 76(to 28,39a) 130(to 16,28) 319
				 416 424 426(from 20,1) 508 509 646 799
				 M�LA3��LA1� = M+416  76�LA3��LA1� = 76+319  646�LA3��LA1� = 646+799

			Translations

Aeth     = Ethiopic version
Arab     = Arabic version (Paris, Bibl. Nat., Arab 9)
Arm      = Armenian version
Co       = Coptic version
		Ach = Achmimic version
		Aeg = Text of Brit.Mus., Or.5299(2)
		Bo  = Bohairic version
  		Fa  = Fayyumic version
		Sa  = Sahidic version
La	= Old Latin version
Pal	= Palestinian-Syriac version
Pesch	= Peshitta
Sam	= Samaritan Pentateuch
Syh	= Syro-hexaplaric version
		Syh�MDOL�L�MDNM� = Lagarde's edition
		Syh�MDOL�T�MDNM� = Tur �LA3��MDIT��MDNM��LA1��LA1�Abdin Ms
Tar	= Targums
		Tar�MDOL�O�MDNM� = Onkelos Targum
		Tar�MDOL�P�MDNM� = Neofiti Targum
Vulg = Vulgate

			Later Greek translations (Apparatus II)

�LA3���LA1�		 	= Aquila
�LA3���LA1�			= Symmachus
�LA3���LA1�			= Theodotion
�LA3��� ��LA1�	�LA3�	�LA1�=�LA3� i� ������
�LA1��LA3��� ��LA1��LA3�    �LA1�= �LA3��� ����
�� ��LA3�	�LA1�	= �LA3��� b����㡦���
i b��LA1��LA3�   �LA1�=�LA3� i ���Ǧ��LA1�
�LA3��h e��LA1��LA3�  �LA1�=�LA3� �h e����
i ��
�LA1��LA3��LA1�	=�LA3�  i ����
�LA3�
�LA1��LA3��h ̦���LA1��LA3� �LA1�= �LA3��h ̦�����
�LA1�(�LA3��h�LA1�)�LA3� 󘣮LA1��LA3�  �LA1�=�LA3� �LA1�(�LA3��h�LA1�)�LA3� 󘣘�����
��LA1��LA3�	�LA1�	=�LA3� ���������LA1�
�LA3������, �����, c�����LA1� = unknown sources

			Printed Editions

Ald		= Aldina
Compl	= Complutensis
Sixt 		= Sixtina
Gr	�LA3�	�LA1�	= Grabe
Ra			= Rahlfs
Ra.		= Conjectures of Rahlfs


				Literature and Collections

AASF	= Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae
APF		= Archiv f�uur Papyrusforschung und verwandte Gebiete
Barh		= Abu 'l-Farag - Barhebraeus' Scholia on the O.T. Ed. by M.Springling
			 and W.C.Graham. Chicago 1931
Bauer	= A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early 		
			 Christian Literature, trans. and ed. b W.F.Arndt and F.W.Gingrich
			 from W. Bauer's "Griechisch-deutsches W�ourterbuch zu den Schriften
			 des Neuen Testaments u. der �uubrigen urchristlichen Literatur".
			 Chicago 1957
BHS		= Biblia Hebraica Stuttgartensia, fasc.2 Exodus et Leviticus, praep. 
			 G.Quell. Stuttgart 1966
BK		= Berliner Klassikertexte aus den Staatlichen Museen Berlin
Bl.D.		= Grammatik des neutestamentlichen Griechisch, von Fr.Blass u. A.
			Debrunner. Bearb. von Fr.Rehkopf. 14.Aufl. G�outtingen 1976
Br.-M.	= The Old Testament in Greek according to the Text of Codex
			 Vati~ca~nus ed. by A.E.Brooke and N.M�MDOL�c�MDSD��MDNM�Lean, vol.I part II, Cambridge
			 1909
CSCO 	= Corpus Scriptorum Christianorum Orientalium
Deuteronomium = Deuteronomium, edidit J.W.Wevers, G�outtingen 1977
Du Cange	= Clossarium Mediae et Infimae Latinitatis conditum a C. du
			 Fresne Domino du Cange. Tom.I-X. Reprint of the edition of 1883-1887. 
	 		 Graz 1954
Field		= Origenis Hexaplorum quae supersunt, ed. Fr. Field, Oxonii 1875
Frede, Verzeichnis  = H.J.Frede, Kirchenschriftsteller, Verzeichnis u. Sigel
		   (Vetus Latina Teil I,1),3, neubearb. u.. erw. Aufl. von B.Fischer,
			Verzeichnis der Sigel f�uur Kirchenschriftsteller. Freiburg i.Br.
		   1981
GCS		= Die griechischen chistlichen Schriftsteller der ersten drei Jahrhunderte 
			 (Berliner Ausgabe)
Genesis 	= Genesis, edidit J.W.Wevers, G�outtingen 1974
Gignac 	= F.T.Gignac, A Grammar of the Greek Papyri of the Roman and		
			 Byzantine Periods. Vol.I. Phonology; Vol.II. Morphology, Testi e
			 Documenti per lo Studio dell' Antichita LV. Milan 1975, 1981
Gooding	= D.W.Gooding, The Account of the Tabernacle: Translation and
			 Textual Problems of the Greek Exodus, Texts and Studies, N.S.VI.
			 Cambridge 1959
Gr		   = Septuaginta Interpretum tomus I, ed. J.E.Grabe, Oxonii 1707
Helbin  	= R.Helbing, Die Kasussyntax der Verba bei den Septuaginta.
			 G�outtingen 1928
Helbing,Gram, = R.Helbing, Grammatik der Septuaginta. Laut- u. Wortlehre.
				 G�outtingen 1907
Hesselink	= Les cinq livres de loi (Le Pentateuque). Traduction en 
				N�eao-Grec publi�eae en caract�egres H�eabraiques a Constaninople en
				 1547, ed.par D.C.Hesselink. Leiden/Leipzig 1897	
Hesych 	= Hesychii Alexandrii Lexicon recensuit et emendavit Kurt Latte.
				 Hauniae 1953, 1966
H.-P.		= Vetus Testamentum Graecum cum variis lectionibus, ed. R.Holmes,
 			tom.I, Oxonii 1798
Ish	  	= Commentaire d'Isho'dad de Merv sur l'Ancien Testament. II. Exode-
			Deut�earonome, �eadit�ea par C. van den Eynde CSCO 176 (Scriptores Syri
		   Tome 80). Louvain 1958
JThSt		= Journal of Theological Studies
Kriara 	= �LA3����,�., �����h ��� �����ठ��� ��������� ���雦�� �򘣣�����.�LA1�
     	�LA3�	  ���󘢦�塞 1964�LA1�--�LA3�
�LA1�Lagarde	= Librorum VT canonicorum pars prior graece Pauli de Lagarde studio 
           et sumptibus, Gottingae 1883
Leviticus  = Leviticus, edidit J.W.Wevers, G�outtingen 1986
LS			= A Greek-English Lexicon by H.G.Liddel and R.Scott. A New Edition
			  by H.S.Jones. Oxford 1940
Mayser	= E.Mayser, Grammatik der griechischen Papyri aus der
           Ptolem�auerzeit. I (2nd Edition revised by H.Schmoll) Berlin 1970
			  I 2 & 3 (2nd ed.) 1938, 1936 II 1 1926, II 2 1933/34,
           II 3 1934 
MSU		= Mitteilungen des Septuaginta Unternehmens, Berlin 1909ff.
Numeri	= Numeri, edidit J.W.Wevers, G�outtingen 1982
PG 		= Migne, Patrologia, Series Graeca
PL		= Migne, Patrologie, Series Latina
Ra			= Septuaginta, ed. A.Rahlfs, Vol.I. Stuttgart 1935
Rahlfs,Verzeichnis = A.Rahlfs, Verzeichnis der griechischen Handschriften des
                     AT (=MSU II), Berlin 1914 
Pusey	= Cyrilli Archiepiscopi Alexandrini in XII Prophetas, ed. P.E.Pusey,
			2 tom. Oxford 1868
Sam�MDOL�Aram�MDNM�	= A.Tal, The Samaritan Targum of the Pentateuch: A Critical
				 Edition, Pt.I: Genesis, Exodus. Texts and Studies in the Hebrew
				 Language and Related Subjects. IV. Tel-Aviv 1980
SC  			= Sources Chr�eatiennes
Schleusner	= Novus Thesaurus philologico-criticus sive Lexicon in LXX..., ed.
             J.Fr.Schleusner, Lipsiae 1820/21
Schneider	= H. Schneider, Die altlateinischen biblischen Catena. Texte u.
				Arbeiten, publ. by die Erzabtei Beuron. 1.Abt. Heft 29-30. Beuron
			     1938
Schwyzer	= E.Schwyzer, Griechische Grammatik auf der Grundlage von Karl
            Brugmanns griechischer Grammatik. Handbuch der Alter~tums-
~				wissenschaft. II.1.Band I:3.Aufl. Band II:2.Aufl. Munich 1959
Swete		= The Old Testament in Greek according to the Septuagint, Vol.1.
				Cambridge 1887
 TECC	   = Textos y Estudios �"[Cardinal Cisneros�"]   
Thack 		= H.St.J.Thackeray, A Grammar of the Old Testament in Greek
				 according to the Septuagint, vol.1. Cambridge 1909
THGD  		= J.W.Wevers, Text History of the Greek Deuteronomy, MSU XIII.
				 G�outtingen 1978
THGE		= J.W.Wevers, Text History of the Greek Exodus. MSU XXI. G�outtingen
             1992
THGG		= J.W.Wevers, Text History of the Greek Genesis. MSU XI. G�outtingen
				 1974
THGL		= J.W.Wevers, Text History of the Greek Leviticus. MSU XIX.
		     G�outtingen 1986		
THGN	= J.W.Wevers, Text History of the Greek Numbers. MSU XIX.
				 G�outtingen 1982
TU		= Texte und Untersuchungen
Wackernagel = Kleine Schriften von Jacob Wackernagel. 2 B�aunde. G�outtingen 1953
Walters 	= P.Walters, The Text of the Septuagint. ed. by D.W.Gooding.
				 Cambridge 1973
Wa.		= Conjectures of Walters
We.		= Conjectures by the editor
ZDMG	= Zeitschrift der deutschen morgenl�aundischen Gesellschaft
ZPE		= Zeitschrift f�uur Papyrusforschung und Epigraphik

					Text Editions and Other Literature
�LS1.5�
Ayuso Marazuela, T., La Vetus Latina Hispana. II.El Octateucho. TECC 6,
	 Madrid 1967
Baillet, M., Discoveries in the Judaean Desert in Jordan III. Oxford 1962
Bellet, P., A Sahidic Fragment of Exodus (21,17-35/23,5-21, Walters Art
	 Gallery  W.739*), The Catholic Biblical Quarterly 40(1978), 37-40
Bilabel,Fr., Griechische Papyri (Urkunden, Briefe, Schreibtafeln, Ostraka,
	 etc.)	mit 2 Tafeln, Ver�ouffentlichungen aus den badischen Papyrus
	 Sammlungen 4, Heidelberg 1924
Billen, A.V., The Old Latin Texts of the Heptateuch. Cambridge 1927
Blanchinus,J., Vindiciae Canonicarum Scripturarum Vulgatae Latinae editionis,
	 seu vetera Sacrorum Bibliorum fragmenta juxta Graecam Vulgatam, et
	 Hexaplarem, Latinam Antiquam Italam, duplicemque S.Eusebii Hieronymi
	 translationem, nunc primum in lucem edita atque illustrata. Romae 1740
Boyd, O., The Octateuch in Ethiopic, Pt.II. Exodus and Leviticus. Bibliotheca
  	Abessinica: Studies concerning the Languages, Literature and History
	of Abyssinia, ed. by E. Littmann IV. Leiden 1911
Ceriani, A.M., Pentateuchi et Iosue quae ex prima scriptura supersunt in cod.
	Ambros. graeco seculi fere  V. Monumenta sacra et profana 3. Milan 1864
Collart,P., Les papyrus Th�eaodore Reinach 2, Cairo 1940
Cox, C., The Armenian Translation of Deuteronomy. University of Pennsylvania
	Armenian Texts and Studies, no.2. Missoula 1981
-- Hexaplaric Materials Preserved in the Armenian Version. Atlanta 1986
Crum, W.E., Catalogue of the Coptic Manuscripts in the British Museum. London 1905
-- Coptic Mss. Brought from the Fayyum by W.M.Flinders Petrie, Esq., D.C.L.
	together with a Papyrus in the Bodleian Library, ed. with Commentaries
	and Indices. London 1893
Diez Macho, A., Exodo, Neophyti: Targum Palestinense ms de la Bibioteca Vaticana. 
	Tomo II. Madrid 1970
de Ricci, S., The Zouche Sahidic Exodus Fragment, (Exodus XVI,6-XIX,11), from
	the original Manuscript. Proc. of the Soc. of Bibl. Archaeology 28(1906)
	54-67
Dold,A., Konstanzer Altlateinische Propheten- u. Evangelien-Bruchst�uucke mit Glossen. Texte und Arbeiten 7-9. Beuron 1923
Fern�aandez Marcos N., u. Saenz-Badillos,A., Theodori Cyrensis Quaestiones in
	Octateuchum, Editio Critica. TECC 17, Madrid 1979
Finn, A.H. The Tabenacle Chapters, JThSt XVI (1915), 448-482
Fleck, F.F., Anecdota maximam partem sacra in itineribus italicis et gallicis
	collecta. Lipsiae 1837
Fraenkel,D., Quast,U. u. Wevers,J.W., Studien zur Septuaginta -- Robert Hanhart zu
  Ehren. MSU XX. G�outtingen 1990
von Gall,A., Der hebr�auische Pentateuch der Samaritaner. Leipzig 1918
Gebhardt,O., ed., Graecus Venetus. Pentateuchi Proverbiorum Ruth Cantici Ecclesiastae
   Threnorum Danielis Versio Graeca. Lipsiae 1875
Gilson,J.P., The Mozarabic Psalter. London 1905
Goshen-Gottstein, M.H., The Bible in the Syropalestinian Version. Part I Pentateuch and
   Prophets. Jerusalem 1973
Grenfell, B.F. and Hunt, A.S., The Oxyrhynchus Papyri 8. London 1911
Kahle, P.E., Bala'izah: Coptic Texts frm Deir al-Bala'izah in Uppper Egypt. 
	Vol.I., Oxford 1954
Kasser, R., Papyrus Bodmer XVI. Exode I-XV,21 en sahidique. Geneva 1961
Koster,M.D., ed., Exodus. The Old Testament in Syriac According to the Peshitta 
	Version ... by the Peshitta Institute Leiden. Part I. fasc.1. Leiden 1977
Lacau,P., Textes Coptes en dialectes akhmimique et sahidique, Bull. d'Inst. francais
	 d'arch�eaologie orientale 8 (1911), 43-64
de Lagarde,P., Bibliotheca Syriaca. G�outtingen 1892
-- Semitica II, Abh.d.K.Ges.d.Wiss. zu G�outtingen 25 (1879)
Magistretti, M., Manuale Ambrosianum, Milan 1905
Masp�earo,G., �Eatudes �eagyptiennes, tome 1 (1883)
-- Fragments de la version th�eabaine de l'Ancien Testament, M�eam.
  publ. par les membres de la mission arch. fr. au Caire, fasc 1. Paris 1892
O'Connell,K.G., The Theodotionic Revision of the Book of Exodus: A Contribution to
	 the Study of the Early History of the Transmission of the Old
	 Testament in Greek. Cambridge, Mass., 1972
Peters, M.K.H., A Critical Edition of the Coptic (Bohairic) Pentateuch, vol.2. 
	Exodus. Septuagint and Cognate Studies 22. Atlanta 1986
Popper,J., Der biblische Bericht �uuber die Stifth�uutte. Leipzig 1862
Ranke,E., Par palimpsestorum Wirceburgensium Antiquissimae Veteris Testamenti
	versionis Latinae fragmenta. Vienna 1871
Rhodes,J.F., The Arabic Versions of the Pentateuch in the Church of Egypt. 
	Leipzig  1921
Robert,U., Pentateuchi versio latina antiquissima e codice Lugdunensi. Paris
	 1881
Sanderson, J.E., An Exodus Scroll from Qumran: 4Q paleoExod�MDOL�m�MDNM� and the
	 Samaritan Tradition. Harvard Semitic Studies 30. Atlanta 1986
Sanz, P.,Griechische literarische Papyri christlichen Inhalts I. Mitteilungen
	der Nationalbibliothek in Wien. N.S. IV  Wien 1946
Schleifer, J., Sahidische Bibel-Fragmente aus dem British Museum zu London
	II. Sitzungsb. Kais.A.d.W.in Wien, philos.-hist. Kl. 164,6, Vienna 1911
-- Bruchst�uucke d.sahidischen Bibel�uubersetzung, idem 170, I. Wien 1912
Schmidt, C., Der erste Clemensbrief in altkoptischer �Uubersetzung. TU 32/1, Leipzig 1908
Sperber,A., The Bible in Aramaic based on Old Manuscripts and Printed Texts. 
	Vol.I. The Pentateuch according to Targum Onkelos. Leiden 1959
Spottorno,V. and Fern�aandez,N., Nuevos Fragmentos del Exodo Griego, Emerita
	 44(1976), 385-395
Staerk, A., Les manuscrits latins du V�MDOL�e�MDNM� au XIII�MDOL�e�MDNM� si�egcle conserv�eas �ag la
	 Bibliotheque Imp�eariale de Saint-P�eatersbourg I. P�eatersbourg 1910
Stegm�uuller, O., Berliner Septuagintafragmente. BK 8. Berlin 1939
Stern,L., Zwei koptische Bibelfragmente, Ztschr. f.aegypt. Sprache 22(1884),
	 97-99
Treu, K., Neue Berliner Septuagintafragmente, APF 47, 52-53
Vaccari, A., Papiri della Societa Italiana 12,2 (1951), 97-105
Vaschalde,A., Ce qui a �eat�ea publi�ea des versions coptes de la Bible, Le
	 Mus�eaon 46 (1933), 299-312
Vercellone,C., Variae Lectiones Vulgatae Latinae Bibliorum I. Rome 1860
Vogliano, A., Papiri della Universit�ag de Milano. Milan 1937
V�ou�oubus,A., The Pentateuch in the Version of the Syro-Hexapla. A facsimile
	 edition of a Midyat MS. discovered 1964. CSCO 369. Louvain 1975
Wessely, C., Griechische und koptische Texte theol. Inhalts I. Studien zur
	Pal�auographie und Papyruskunde IX, Leipzig 1909
Wevers, J.W., A Note on Scribal Error, Canadian Journal of Linguistics 17
	 (1972), 185-190
--			The Use of Versions for Text Criticism: The Septuagint in La
	   	Septuaginta en la Investigacion Contemporanea (V.Congreso de la
		 IOSCS), edidato por N.Fern�aandez Marcos, Madrid 1985
--			An Apologia for Septuagint Studies, in Bull. of IOSCS 18 (1986)
--			Translation and Canonicity: A Study in the Narrative Portions of the
	      Greek Exodus, in Scripta signa vocis: Studies about Scripts,
		   Scriptures, Scribes and Languages in the Near East, offered to
		   J.H.Hospers by his his pupils, colleagues and friends, Groningen
		   1986
--			Notes on the Greek Text of Exodus. Septuagint and Cognate Studies
		30. Atlanta 1990
Wright,D.H., The Vespasian Psalter (British Museum Cotton Vespasian A.1). Early 
	 English Manuscripts in Facsimile, Vol.XIV. Copenhagen 1967
Ziegler,L., Bruchst�uucke einer vorhieronymianischen �Uubersetzung des Pentateuch
	 aus einem Palimpseste des K.Hof- und Staatsbibliothek zu M�uunchen.
	 Munich 1883
Zohrab,J., ed. Astuaca�swun�cw Matean Hin ew Nor Ktaktarana�cw (Holy Writings 
	of the Old and New Testaments) Venice 1805