Next: Partial vs. Total Diglossia
Up: Diglossia and the Linguistic
Previous: Shifting domains and Diglossia.
If diglossia is an
aspect of linguistic culture, it may result from and be maintained by
the existence of a linguistic area (Emeneau 1956) in which diglossia is
an areal feature as well as a feature of a particular linguistic
culture within the area. In South Asia, and in those Southeast Asian
linguistic cultures that use Indic writing systems, diglossia seems
to be a well-nigh inherent characteristic of the linguistic
cultures, since there is a tendency to develop
diglossia even in languages that originally may have not exhibited a
great degree of it. When Hindustani was chosen as the national
language of independent India, supposedly because of its wide use as
a lingua franca in the area, steps were immediately taken to develop
an H variety, highly Sanskritized in vocabulary, since the vernaculars
of Hindi then in existence seemed to be too `Low' for many citizens of
the country. Of course diglossicization as a value may vary from
sub-culture to sub-culture in the region, but it cannot be denied
that the overall view in South Asia and peninsular Southeast Asia is
pro-diglossic.
Next: Partial vs. Total Diglossia
Up: Diglossia and the Linguistic
Previous: Shifting domains and Diglossia.
Harold Schiffman
1/25/1999