Graduate Education in Classics: A Continuing Conversation....

Report of the Task Force on the Relationship between Graduate Education and the Undergraduate Curriculum


Section 1: Discussion questions

1. Are our grad schools preparing people well for careers in undergraduate teaching?

General sense among several respondents that grad schools were not doing this well. Neatly summarized by B. Kaster: "Among the causes: grad. programs mainly train people to write and publish...; most grad. faculty are neither much rewarded for, nor much encouraged to reflect systematically on, their own teaching, still less that of their students; at a school like my own... students in the undergrad. college are taught primarily by members of the regular research faculty.... opportunities for grad. students to teach more than beginning languages and the occasional discussion section are intentionally limited by central administration." B. Cape offered one solution that was generally endorsed and reinforced by others' comments later: "My solution would be a program with two components. First would be a course on theories/methods of teaching myth, civ., and the language courses, with time spent reviewing a range of currently available text books. (This is something Sander Goldberg did with just Latin at UCLA. I think it could be broadened without losing intensity.) The course cannot answer everything or substitute for experience, but, as all courses, it would offer some information and lots of help knowing where to go later when other questions arise. Second would be a teaching assistant training program where one faculty member would a) observe the TA at least every other week (more in the beginning) through class visitation or by watching a video of the class, b) discuss with the TA the high/low/baffling points in that week's classes (and perhaps review the video with the TA to point out specifics--I am a great fan of reviewing videos to see how one teaches), and c) hold occasional group meetings of TAs to cover common ground, run a master class, give a TA a situation to 'teach' to the others, etc. Is this time-intensive? YES!!! Is it feasible and will it work? I have to think so. The faculty member would have to get a course-equivalent for this work and must be deeply committed. The student might also need to take it as a class--a practicum? I think it can be done. I would sure like the chance to do it someday! I think it would help students in two ways: 1) provide better training teaching lower-level language and civ. courses; 2) instill in the student respect for good teaching as an integral part of what it means to be a professor/scholar."